Intertrade Two (Pty) Ltd v MEC for Roads and Public Works, Eastern Cape, and Another
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Judge | Plasket J, Revelas J and Kemp AJ |
| Judgment Date | 31 May 2007 |
| Citation | 2007 (6) SA 442 (Ck) |
| Docket Number | 1790/04 |
| Hearing Date | 29 March 2007 |
| Counsel | Adv Kemp SC for the appellant R G Buchanan SC (with S V Notshe SC) for the respondents |
| Court | Ciskei High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 practice notes
-
On equating ‘mays’ with ‘musts’: When can a discretionary power be interpreted as a mandatory one?
...ssar y to do justice bet ween the parties’. 214 Intertrade Two (Pt y) Ltd v MEC for Roads and P ublic Works Easte rn Cape & another 2007 (6) SA 442 (Ck) para 42. Plasket J observed the open- ended nature of s 8(1) and (2) of PAJA when discussi ng (although not d eciding upon) the respondent......
-
Tripartite Steering Committee and Another v Minister of Basic Education and Others
...1992 (4) SA 69 (A) ([1992] ZASCA 112): referred to Intertrade Two (Pty) Ltd v MEC for Roads and Public Works, Eastern Cape and Another 2007 (6) SA 442 (Ck) ([2008] 1 All SA 142): referred to Johannesburg Liquor Licensing Board v Kuhn 1963 (4) SA 666 (A): I dictum at 671C – D applied Kemp NO......
-
On equating ‘mays’ with ‘musts’: When can a discretionary power be interpreted as a mandatory one?
...ssar y to do justice bet ween the parties’. 214 Intertrade Two (Pt y) Ltd v MEC for Roads and P ublic Works Easte rn Cape & another 2007 (6) SA 442 (Ck) para 42. Plasket J observed the open- ended nature of s 8(1) and (2) of PAJA when discussi ng (although not d eciding upon) the respondent......
-
Minister of Defence and Military Veterans and Another v Mamasedi
...(10) BCLR 931; [2005] 3 All SA 33): referred to Intertrade Two (Pty) Ltd v MEC for Roads and Public Works, Eastern Cape, I and Another 2007 (6) SA 442 (Ck) ([2008] 1 All SA 142): dictum in para [43] applied Minister of Health and Another NO v New Clicks South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others (Tr......
Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
-
Tripartite Steering Committee and Another v Minister of Basic Education and Others
...1992 (4) SA 69 (A) ([1992] ZASCA 112): referred to Intertrade Two (Pty) Ltd v MEC for Roads and Public Works, Eastern Cape and Another 2007 (6) SA 442 (Ck) ([2008] 1 All SA 142): referred to Johannesburg Liquor Licensing Board v Kuhn 1963 (4) SA 666 (A): I dictum at 671C – D applied Kemp NO......
-
Minister of Defence and Military Veterans and Another v Mamasedi
...(10) BCLR 931; [2005] 3 All SA 33): referred to Intertrade Two (Pty) Ltd v MEC for Roads and Public Works, Eastern Cape, I and Another 2007 (6) SA 442 (Ck) ([2008] 1 All SA 142): dictum in para [43] applied Minister of Health and Another NO v New Clicks South Africa (Pty) Ltd and Others (Tr......
-
City of Johannesburg v Rand Properties (Pty) Ltd and Others
...a structure that is waterproof and secure against the elements; and with access to basic sanitation, water and refuse services. J 2007 (6) SA p442 Harms ADP 2.2 In order to implement the foregoing, the city of Johannesburg A must open within seven days a register of persons who qualify and ......
-
Kalisa v The Chairperson of the Refugee Appeal Board
...view expressed by Plasket J in Intertrade Two (Pty) Ltd v MEC for Roads and Public Works, Eastern Cape, and Another [2007] ZAECHC 149, 2007 (6) SA 442 (Ck), [2008] 1 All SA 142 (Ck) at para. 43 that ''[t]he availability of proper and adequate information and the institutional competence of ......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
On equating ‘mays’ with ‘musts’: When can a discretionary power be interpreted as a mandatory one?
...ssar y to do justice bet ween the parties’. 214 Intertrade Two (Pt y) Ltd v MEC for Roads and P ublic Works Easte rn Cape & another 2007 (6) SA 442 (Ck) para 42. Plasket J observed the open- ended nature of s 8(1) and (2) of PAJA when discussi ng (although not d eciding upon) the respondent......
-
On equating ‘mays’ with ‘musts’: When can a discretionary power be interpreted as a mandatory one?
...ssar y to do justice bet ween the parties’. 214 Intertrade Two (Pt y) Ltd v MEC for Roads and P ublic Works Easte rn Cape & another 2007 (6) SA 442 (Ck) para 42. Plasket J observed the open- ended nature of s 8(1) and (2) of PAJA when discussi ng (although not d eciding upon) the respondent......
-
Administrative Law
...SA 245 (CC).109 Paras 18 and 22.110 Trencon (note 108) para 47; Kalisa (note 105) para 22.111 Hoexter and Penfold (note 21) 794.112 2007 (6) SA 442 (Ck) para 43.113 Para 36. © Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd AdmINIstrAtIve LAW 87satisfied that the applicant qual ified for the applicable refugee ......