Hoechst Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Ltd v the Beauty Box (Pty) Ltd (In Liquidation) and Another

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Citation1987 (2) SA 600 (A)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
28 practice notes
  • Reckitt & Colman SA (Pty) Ltd v S C Johnson & Son SA (Pty) Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...in respect of such surveys laid down in Hoechst Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Ltd v The Beauty Box (Pty) Ltd (in Uquidation) and Another 1987 (2) SA 600 (A), namely that the questions asked of interviewees in the survey should be fair and should be so formulated that they precluded a weighted or co......
  • Sportshoe (Pty) Ltd v Pep Stores (SA) (Pty) Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Insurance Co 1985 (3) SA 916 (A) at 939G; Hoechst B Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Ltd v The Beauty Box (Pty) Ltd (in Liquidation) and Another 1987 (2) SA 600 (A) at 618F; Capital Estate and General Agencies (Pty) Ltd and Others v Holiday Inns Inc and Others 1977 (2) SA 916 (A) at 929C; Brian Boswel......
  • Discovery Holdings Ltd v Sanlam Ltd and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...action is proof of a relevant reputation (Hoechst Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Ltd v The Beauty Box (Pty) Ltd (in liquidation) and Another 1987 (2) SA 600 (A) at 613F – G; Brian Boswell Circus (Pty) Ltd and Another v Boswell-Wilkie Circus (Pty) Ltd 1985 (4) SA 466 (A) at 479D; Williams t/a Jenifer......
  • Philip Morris Inc and Another v Marlboro Shirt Co SA Ltd and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...during the period 1978 - 1982. The dictum in Hoechst Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Ltd v The Beauty Box (Pty) Ltd (in Liquidation) and Another 1987 (2) SA 600 (A) at 619D - 620A Held, accordingly, that Philip Morris had failed to establish that, when it had approached the Court a quo in 1987, there......
  • Get Started for Free
27 cases
  • Reckitt & Colman SA (Pty) Ltd v S C Johnson & Son SA (Pty) Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...in respect of such surveys laid down in Hoechst Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Ltd v The Beauty Box (Pty) Ltd (in Uquidation) and Another 1987 (2) SA 600 (A), namely that the questions asked of interviewees in the survey should be fair and should be so formulated that they precluded a weighted or co......
  • Sportshoe (Pty) Ltd v Pep Stores (SA) (Pty) Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Insurance Co 1985 (3) SA 916 (A) at 939G; Hoechst B Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Ltd v The Beauty Box (Pty) Ltd (in Liquidation) and Another 1987 (2) SA 600 (A) at 618F; Capital Estate and General Agencies (Pty) Ltd and Others v Holiday Inns Inc and Others 1977 (2) SA 916 (A) at 929C; Brian Boswel......
  • Discovery Holdings Ltd v Sanlam Ltd and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...action is proof of a relevant reputation (Hoechst Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Ltd v The Beauty Box (Pty) Ltd (in liquidation) and Another 1987 (2) SA 600 (A) at 613F – G; Brian Boswell Circus (Pty) Ltd and Another v Boswell-Wilkie Circus (Pty) Ltd 1985 (4) SA 466 (A) at 479D; Williams t/a Jenifer......
  • Philip Morris Inc and Another v Marlboro Shirt Co SA Ltd and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...during the period 1978 - 1982. The dictum in Hoechst Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Ltd v The Beauty Box (Pty) Ltd (in Liquidation) and Another 1987 (2) SA 600 (A) at 619D - 620A Held, accordingly, that Philip Morris had failed to establish that, when it had approached the Court a quo in 1987, there......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Principles and policy in unlawful competition: An Aquilian mask?
    • South Africa
    • Juta Acta Juridica No. , August 2019
    • 29 Mayo 2019
    ...case.' See also Meter Systems Holdings Ltd v Venter (n 9) at 427-8; Hoechst Pharmaceuticals (Pty) Ltd v The Beauty Box (Pty) Ltd 1987 (2) SA 600 (A) at 613. 18 See note 10 at 453G. 19 1998 (3) SA 938 (SCA). © Juta and Company (Pty) principles of Aquilian liability, but have become principle......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT