Gundwana v Steko Development and Others

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Citation2011 (3) SA 608 (CC)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
85 practice notes
  • Maphango and Others v Aengus Lifestyle Properties (Pty) Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...v Grootboom and Others 2001 (1) SA 46 (CC) (2000 (11) BCLR 1169; [2000] ZACC 19): referred to Gundwana v Steko Development and Others 2011 (3) SA 608 (CC) (2011 (8) BCLR 792; [2011] ZACC 14): referred Health Professions Council of SA v De Bruin [2004] 4 All SA 392 (SCA): referred to G Heris......
  • Nedbank Ltd v Fraser and Another and Four Other Cases
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...toGoldberg v Buytendag Boerdery Beleggings (Edms) Bpk 1980 (4) SA 775 (A):referred toGundwana v Steko Development CC and Others 2011 (3) SA 608 (CC):discussed and appliedHallowes v The Yacht Sweet Waters 1995 (2) SA 270 (D) (1995 (2) BCLR172): referred toHavenga v Parker 1993 (3) SA 724 (T)......
  • Nkata v FirstRand Bank Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Company (Pty) Ltd FirstRand Bank Ltd v Nkata 2015 (4) SA 417 (SCA) ([2015] ZASCA 44):reversed on appealGundwana v Steko Development CC 2011 (3) SA 608 (CC) (2011 (8) BCLR792; [2011] ZACC 14): dictum in para [53] appliedHarrismith Board of Executors v Odendaal 1923 AD 530: dictumat 539 appli......
  • The importance of process and substance
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Southern African Public Law No. 32-1&2, August 2017
    • 1 Agosto 2017
    ...Importance of the Rule of Law’ (Penguin Books 2010) 1.23 Zondi (n 18) para 61.24 ibid para 74. 25 2005 (2) SA 140 (CC) (‘Jaftha’).26 2011 (3) SA 608 (CC). 7Marcus and Du Plessis The Importance of Process and Substanceoversight over the execution process requires a magistrate or a judge to c......
  • Get Started for Free
70 cases
  • Maphango and Others v Aengus Lifestyle Properties (Pty) Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...v Grootboom and Others 2001 (1) SA 46 (CC) (2000 (11) BCLR 1169; [2000] ZACC 19): referred to Gundwana v Steko Development and Others 2011 (3) SA 608 (CC) (2011 (8) BCLR 792; [2011] ZACC 14): referred Health Professions Council of SA v De Bruin [2004] 4 All SA 392 (SCA): referred to G Heris......
  • Nedbank Ltd v Fraser and Another and Four Other Cases
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...toGoldberg v Buytendag Boerdery Beleggings (Edms) Bpk 1980 (4) SA 775 (A):referred toGundwana v Steko Development CC and Others 2011 (3) SA 608 (CC):discussed and appliedHallowes v The Yacht Sweet Waters 1995 (2) SA 270 (D) (1995 (2) BCLR172): referred toHavenga v Parker 1993 (3) SA 724 (T)......
  • Nkata v FirstRand Bank Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Company (Pty) Ltd FirstRand Bank Ltd v Nkata 2015 (4) SA 417 (SCA) ([2015] ZASCA 44):reversed on appealGundwana v Steko Development CC 2011 (3) SA 608 (CC) (2011 (8) BCLR792; [2011] ZACC 14): dictum in para [53] appliedHarrismith Board of Executors v Odendaal 1923 AD 530: dictumat 539 appli......
  • Mkhize v Umvoti Municipality and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Bank Ltd v Folscher and Another, and Similar Matters 2011 (4) SA 314 (GNP): referred to Gundwana v Steko Development and Others 2011 (3) SA 608 (CC) (2011 (8) BCLR 792): Jaftha v Schoeman and Others; Van Rooyen v Stoltz and Others 2005 (2) SA 140 (CC) (2005 (1) BCLR 78) explained and applie......
  • Get Started for Free
15 books & journal articles
  • The importance of process and substance
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Southern African Public Law No. 32-1&2, August 2017
    • 1 Agosto 2017
    ...Importance of the Rule of Law’ (Penguin Books 2010) 1.23 Zondi (n 18) para 61.24 ibid para 74. 25 2005 (2) SA 140 (CC) (‘Jaftha’).26 2011 (3) SA 608 (CC). 7Marcus and Du Plessis The Importance of Process and Substanceoversight over the execution process requires a magistrate or a judge to c......
  • The importance of process and substance
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Southern African Public Law No. 32-1-2, August 2017
    • 1 Agosto 2017
    ...Importance of the Rule of Law’ (Penguin Books 2010) 1.23 Zondi (n 18) para 61.24 ibid para 74. 25 2005 (2) SA 140 (CC) (‘Jaftha’).26 2011 (3) SA 608 (CC). 7Marcus and Du Plessis The Importance of Process and Substanceoversight over the execution process requires a magistrate or a judge to c......
  • Reinstatement of a Home Mortgage Bond by Paying the Arrears: The Need for Appropriate Legislative Reform
    • South Africa
    • Juta Stellenbosch Law Review No. , August 2019
    • 16 Agosto 2019
    ...ure under the Co nstitution: P roperty, Hous ing and the National Cred it Act LLD thesis Stellen bosch (2012) 3786 2005 2 SA 140 (CC)7 2011 3 SA 608 (CC)8 For more detailed d iscussion of the position , see Steyn Forced Sale of t he Home 67-72; Steyn (2013) IIR 162-164; R Brits & AJ van der......
  • Execution against Residential Immovable Property in terms of High Court Rule 46A
    • South Africa
    • Juta Stellenbosch Law Review No. , June 2021
    • 21 Junio 2021
    ...2019 JDR 1496 (WCC) para 18, citing J aftha v Schoeman; Van Rooy en v Stoltz 2005 2 SA 140 (CC) para 59; Gund wana v Steko Developm ent 2011 3 SA 608 (CC) pa ra 54 See f urther C hanging Tides 17 (Pty) Limited v Murir itirwa (5290/2019) 2020 ZAGPPHC 132 (7 April 2020) paras 20-21 SAFLII w1s......
  • Get Started for Free