Government Employees Pension Fund v Naidoo and Another

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeScott JA, Navsa JA, Mthiyane JA, Lewis JA and Maya AJA
Judgment Date28 November 2005
Citation2006 (6) SA 304 (SCA)
Docket Number32/2005
Hearing Date17 November 2005
CounselC van Jaarsveld for the appellant. No appearance for the respondents.
CourtSupreme Court of Appeal

Scott JA:

[1] The respondents in this appeal were formerly married. I Their marriage, which was in community of property, was dissolved in the Durban High Court on 7 May 2004. The first respondent (Mrs Naidoo) was the plaintiff in the divorce proceedings. The second respondent (Mr Naidoo) did not oppose them. The order granted in Mrs Naidoo's favour included the following: J

Scott JA

'(d)

That the plaintiff is entitled, in terms of ss 7(7)(a) and 7(8)(a)(i) of the Divorce Act 70 A of 1979 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), to a one half share of the defendant's interest in and to the defendant's Pension Fund by virtue of his employment with the KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Administration (hereinafter referred to as the said Fund), calculated at the date of divorce between the parties but payable when the benefits of the said Fund accrue to the defendant. B

(e)

That the Manager of the said Fund is directed to endorse its records, in terms of s 7(8)(a)(ii) of the said Act, to reflect the plaintiff's right as aforesaid in and to the defendant's interest in the said Fund.

(f)

That, in terms of s 7(8)(a)(i) of the said Act, the said Fund and/or the defendant shall pay to the plaintiff one half of the value of the defendant's interest in and C to the said Fund calculated at the date of divorce but payable when the benefits thereof accrue to the defendant.'

The orders in terms of these paragraphs were granted per incuriam. Subsections 7(7) and 7(8) of the Divorce Act 70 of 1979 are concerned with pension benefits which have not yet accrued to the member spouse. Insofar as is relevant, the subsections read: D

'(7)(a) In the determination of the patrimonial benefits to which the parties to any divorce action may be entitled, the pension interest of a party shall, subject to paras (b) and (c), be deemed to be part of his assets.

(b) The amount so deemed to be part of a party's assets, shall be reduced by any amount of his pension interest which, by virtue of para (a), in a previous divorce - E

(i)

was paid over or awarded to another party; or

(ii)

for the purposes of an agreement contemplated in ss (1), was accounted in favour of another party.

(c) . . . .

(8) Notwithstanding the provisions of any other law or of the rules of any pension fund - F

(a)

the court granting a decree of divorce in respect of a member of such a fund, may make an order that -

(i)

any part of the pension interest of that member which, by virtue of ss (7), is due or assigned to the other party to the divorce action concerned, shall be paid by that fund to that other party when any pension benefits accrue in respect of that member; G

(ii)

an endorsement be made in the records of that fund that that part of the pension interest concerned is so payable to that other party;

(b)

...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 practice notes
  • ST v CT
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...to Elesang v PPC Lime Ltd and Others 2007 (6) SA 328 (NC): distinguished Government Employees Pension Fund v Naidoo and Another 2006 (6) SA 304 (SCA): distinguished Kirkland v Kirkland 2006 (6) SA 144 (C): distinguished Kudu Granite Operations (Pty) Ltd v Caterna Ltd 2003 (5) SA 193 (SCA) J......
  • ST v CT
    • South Africa
    • Supreme Court of Appeal
    • 30 May 2018
    ...SA 328 (NC) para 20; Kirkland v Kirkland 2006 (6) SA 144 (C) paras 82 – 83; Government Employees Pension Fund v Naidoo and Another 2006 (6) SA 304 (SCA). [29] Published in Government Gazette No [30] Yarona Healthcare Network (Pty) Ltd v Medshield Medical Scheme 2018 (1) SA 513 (SCA) para 48......
  • Wanneer vind artikel 7(7) van die Wet op Egskeiding, 70 van 1979, toepassing? : aantekeninge
    • South Africa
    • De Jure No. 46-3, January 2013
    • 1 January 2013
    ...De Kock v Jacobson1999 4 SA 346 (W) 348J-349B, 349F-G, 350G; Sempapalele v Sempapalele311B-D; Government Employees Pension Fund v Naidoo 2006 6 SA 304(HHA) 306A-B; Elesang v PPC Lime Ltd 2007 6 SA 328 (NKA) parr 17-18,20.) Die pensioenbelang skep ook geen reg vir die lid nie, maar ten beste......
  • MS v ME
    • South Africa
    • Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg
    • 29 October 2014
    ...by the respondent from her pension fund went ex lege into the joint estate. (See: Government Employes Pension Fund v Naidoo & Another 2006 (6) SA 304 (SCA))The appellant had a half share in such moneys during the course of the marriage. There were no 'benefits' in existence at the time of t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 cases
  • ST v CT
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...to Elesang v PPC Lime Ltd and Others 2007 (6) SA 328 (NC): distinguished Government Employees Pension Fund v Naidoo and Another 2006 (6) SA 304 (SCA): distinguished Kirkland v Kirkland 2006 (6) SA 144 (C): distinguished Kudu Granite Operations (Pty) Ltd v Caterna Ltd 2003 (5) SA 193 (SCA) J......
  • ST v CT
    • South Africa
    • Supreme Court of Appeal
    • 30 May 2018
    ...SA 328 (NC) para 20; Kirkland v Kirkland 2006 (6) SA 144 (C) paras 82 – 83; Government Employees Pension Fund v Naidoo and Another 2006 (6) SA 304 (SCA). [29] Published in Government Gazette No [30] Yarona Healthcare Network (Pty) Ltd v Medshield Medical Scheme 2018 (1) SA 513 (SCA) para 48......
  • MS v ME
    • South Africa
    • Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg
    • 29 October 2014
    ...by the respondent from her pension fund went ex lege into the joint estate. (See: Government Employes Pension Fund v Naidoo & Another 2006 (6) SA 304 (SCA))The appellant had a half share in such moneys during the course of the marriage. There were no 'benefits' in existence at the time of t......
  • Eskom Pension and Provident Fund v Krugel and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...G Case law De Kock v Jacobson 1999 (4) SA 346 (W): dictum at 349F – G applied Government Employees Pension Fund v Naidoo and Another 2006 (6) SA 304 (SCA): dictum in para [1] Old Mutual Life Assurance Co (SA) Ltd and Another v Swemmer 2004 (5) SA 373 (SCA): dictum in para [18] applied. H St......
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT