Epstein v Christodoulou and Another
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Court | Witwatersrand Local Division |
| Judge | Van Reenen J |
| Judgment Date | 03 November 1981 |
| Citation | 1982 (3) SA 347 (W) |
| Hearing Date | 02 November 1981 |
Van Reenen J:
F While Mr Browde for the plaintiff was opening his case yesterday his interpretation of the pleadings was challenged by Mr Cohen and Mr Zulman, and it was requested that I should at this early stage rule as to the effect of these pleadings, so that, if necessary, appropriate steps to set the matter right could be taken at this stage.
G At the outset I wish to set out my views on the general issue of the adequacy or not of pleadings. It is trite to say that the purpose of pleadings is to set out and define clearly the issues between the parties so that each one, as well as the Court, may know what case is to be made out and what case has to be met. In the past it was customary to scrutinise each individual pleading closely and our Courts were H continually called upon to rule upon technical objections. Meticulous observance of the Rules applying to each type of pleading was sought by litigants and enforced by our Courts. But for some decades now we have been moving away from this formalism and these technicalities. The pressure on our time and resources has become too great to squander energy in this way.
Litigants were allowed greater freedom in formulating their pleadings and the tendency has been to relax the Rules whenever it seemed
Van Reenen J
expedient to do so. But this tendency has led to another undesirable consequence, namely that the real issues to be decided were no longer A clearly formulated at the outset, but were left to emerge and become clarified as the case proceeded. Although this has given litigants greater freedom, it, in its turn, has now tended to overstrain our time and our resources. We must somehow resolve this dilemma with which we are faced.
On the one hand we must, for economy's sake, have clarity of pleadings B with issues clearly defined, while on the other hand we must avoid...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Venmop 275 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Cleverlad Projects (Pty) Ltd and Another
...(A): E dictum at 1042 applied Ellis v Morgan; Ellis v Dessai 1909 TS 576: dictum at 581 applied Epstein v Christodoulou and Another 1982 (3) SA 347 (W): referred to Ex parte Minister van Justisie: In re S v Wagner 1965 (4) SA 507 (A): referred to Foize Africa (Pty) Ltd v Foize Beheer BV and......
-
Joubert and Others v Venter
...GM Co Ltd 1925 AD at 198; Kali v Incorporated General Insurances Ltd 1976 (2) SA at 181H - 182B; Epstein v Christodoulou and Another 1982 (3) SA 347. In instances of oral defamation it was specifically G held to be necessary to name the persons on whom plaintiff relies to prove publication.......
-
Bernard Gutman NO v National Data Systems (Pty) Ltd
...party is able to come to court prepared to meet the case of the other without being taken by surprise. See: Epstein v Christodoulou, 1982 (3) SA 347 (W) at 347 Trope v South African Reserve Bank, 1992 (3) SA 208 (T) at 210 H; Imprefed (Pty) Ltd v National Transport Commission, 1993 (3) SA 9......
-
Venmop 275 (Pty) Ltd and Another v Cleverlad Projects (Pty) Ltd and Another
...(A): E dictum at 1042 applied Ellis v Morgan; Ellis v Dessai 1909 TS 576: dictum at 581 applied Epstein v Christodoulou and Another 1982 (3) SA 347 (W): referred to Ex parte Minister van Justisie: In re S v Wagner 1965 (4) SA 507 (A): referred to Foize Africa (Pty) Ltd v Foize Beheer BV and......
-
Joubert and Others v Venter
...GM Co Ltd 1925 AD at 198; Kali v Incorporated General Insurances Ltd 1976 (2) SA at 181H - 182B; Epstein v Christodoulou and Another 1982 (3) SA 347. In instances of oral defamation it was specifically G held to be necessary to name the persons on whom plaintiff relies to prove publication.......
-
Bernard Gutman NO v National Data Systems (Pty) Ltd
...party is able to come to court prepared to meet the case of the other without being taken by surprise. See: Epstein v Christodoulou, 1982 (3) SA 347 (W) at 347 Trope v South African Reserve Bank, 1992 (3) SA 208 (T) at 210 H; Imprefed (Pty) Ltd v National Transport Commission, 1993 (3) SA 9......