Electronic Commerce: Challenging the Income Tax Base?

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Citation(2005) 17 SA Merc LJ 305
AuthorAnnet Wanyana Oguttu
Pages305-322
Published date16 August 2019
Date16 August 2019
Electronic Commerce: Challenging
the Income Tax Base?
ANNET WANYANA OGUTTU*
BEATRIX VAN DER MERWE**
University of South Africa
1 Introduction
Increasing population growth and political and economic instabilities often
force governments to levy high taxes to meet the costs of providing new and
improved infrastructures. This frequently results in increased tax burdens
which, in turn, lead to the exploitation of means to avoid taxes. Taxpayers
often try to avoid a country’s jurisdiction to tax by diverting income to low-tax
jurisdictions (tax havens) where it will be subject to no or minimum taxation.1
This may be achieved by exploiting the differences between tax rates, legal
concepts, standards of administration, reporting and enforcement, governments’
attitudes towards the liberty and privacy of taxpayers, and the conf‌i dentiality
of business and f‌i nancial transactions.2 This trend is normally referred to as
‘offshore tax avoidance’ and is of major concern to tax authorities since it
results in the depletion of the tax base of the country from which investments
are diverted. Several factors have encouraged offshore tax avoidance. These
include the current trend towards a global economy that has broken down
economic barriers between countries and has encouraged international trade,
riding on a wave of telecommunication development that allows businesses to
reach world markets easily and cheaply. Important to the present discussion
is the development of what has become known as electronic commerce
(‘e-commerce’).
e-Commerce is a term used to describe the wide array of commercial
activities carried out by electronic means that enable trade without the conf‌i nes
* LLB (Makerere University, Uganda) LLM (Unisa). Lecturer in the Department of Mercantile Law,
School of Law, University of South Africa.
** BA LLB (Stel) LLM (Unisa). Associate Professor in the Department of Mercantile Law, School of
Law, University of South Africa.
1 Tax avoidance refers to the use of legal methods of arranging one’s affairs to pay less tax such
as identifying loopholes and exploiting them within legal parameters. This may be contrasted with
tax evasion which is illegal and usually involves the non-disclosure of income, the rendering of false
returns, and the claiming of unwarranted deductions. See Vern Krishna Tax Avoidance: The General
Anti-Avoidance Rule (1990) at 9; The Committee on Fiscal Affairs of the Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development (‘OECD’) Issues in International Taxation No 1. International Tax
Avoidance and Evasion: Four Related Studies (1987) at 1; David Meyerowitz Meyerowitz on Income
Tax (2004-2005) in par 29.1; Alwyn de Koker Silke on South African Income Tax vol 3 (2004) in par
19.1; United Nations (‘UN’) International Cooperation in Tax Matters: Guidelines for International
Cooperation against the Evasion and Avoidance of Taxes (with Specif‌i c Reference to Taxes on Income,
Prof‌i ts, Capital and Capital Gains) (1984) at 11.
2 UN op cit note 1 at 11; Brian J Arnold & Michael McIntyre International Tax Primer 2 ed (2002)
at 9.
305
(2005) 17 SA Merc LJ 305
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
306 (2005) 17 SA Merc LJ
of geographical boundaries.3 Technology enables the transmission of voice,
data, images and video information to take place in cyberspace (sometimes
called the ‘information highway’) by making use of the Internet.4 This has
resulted in a brand-new route for the exchange of goods and services and
the accessing of offshore facilities that has not yet fully been examined or
regulated.5 e-Commerce may thus change the distribution of taxable activities
and may consequently alter the balance of taxing authority.6 It is feared that
e-commerce will lead to the erosion of the tax base due to the ease with which
the jurisdictional requirements may be manipulated.
The objective of this paper is to determine whether e-commerce provides
opportunities for offshore tax avoidance by challenging South Africa’s
jurisdiction to tax income and also, in conclusion, to consider the enforcement
challenges presented by trade conducted over the Internet.
2 The Jurisdiction to Tax
Before any country can levy a tax on income, a connection or tax nexus must
be established between itself and that income. The two main connecting factors
underlying the taxation of income are the source and the residence principles of
taxation. Under the source principle, persons are taxed on income that originates
within the territorial jurisdiction or geographical conf‌i nes of the country, despite
the taxpayer’s country of residence.7 Under the residence principle of taxation,
residents are taxed on their world-wide income regardless of the source of such
income.8 Most jurisdictions, including our own, have adopted a combination
(hybrid system) of these two principles.9 It has been suggested that e-commerce
challenges these jurisdictional principles, governed, as they are, by national
sovereignty and having been developed in the days of ‘brick and mortar’ where
physical presence in a jurisdiction was necessary to enforce tax laws and where
cross-border transactions involved mostly tangible products.10
We will now examine whether this assertion is true in respect of South
Africa’s jurisdiction to tax income.
3 Richard L Doernberg, Luc Hinnekens, Walter Hellerstein & Jinyan Li Electronic Commerce and
Multijurisdictional Taxation (2001) at 2; South African Revenue Service (‘SARS’) Discussion Document
Electronic Commerce and South African Taxation (Mar 2000) at 5; Department of Communications
Green Paper on e-Commerce. Making it Your Business (Nov 2000) at 9; Richard A Westin International
Taxation of Electronic Commerce (2000) at 2.
4 The Internet is described by Lilian Edwards & Charlotte Waelde Law and the Internet: Regulating
Cyberspace (1997) at 12 as ‘a network of computers that allows people to communicate with other people
from all over the world’. It is also described as the world-wide network of networks that employ the
‘transmission control protocol’ or ‘internet protocol’ and share a common address space: see Reinhardt
Buys & Francis Cronjé Cyber Law: The Law of the Internet in South Africa 2 ed (2004) at 232.
5 Clive Sher ‘Taxation of E-commerce’ (2000) 39 Income Tax Reporter 172.
6 Doernberg et al op cit note 3 at 3.
7 Meyerowitz op cit note 1 in par 7.1.
8 Ibid.
9 Julian Ware & Paul Roper Offshore Insight (2001) at 107; Edwards & Waelde op cit note 4 at 171;
Hammond Suddards E-commerce: A Guide to the Law of Electronic Business (1999) at 259; Lynette
Olivier ‘Residence Based Taxation’ 2000 Tydskrif vir die Suid Afrikaanse Reg 20; Milton Grundy The
World of International Tax Planning (1984) at 3.
10 Suddards op cit note 9 at 255; Westin op cit note 3 at 2; see also the Green Paper on e-Commerce
op cit note 3 at 22.
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT