Dorbyl Vehicle Trading & Finance Co (Pty) Ltd v Klopper

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Citation1996 (2) SA 237 (N)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 practice notes
  • Constitutionalisation and Transformation of Credit Law Practices such as Set-Off: An Analysis of National Credit Regulator v Standard Bank Ltd of South Africa Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , September 2020
    • September 20, 2020
    ...5 ed (Juta 2012) 97.69Mupangavanhu, (University of Cape Town 2016) 195.70See Dorbyl Vehicle Trading & Finance Co (Pty) Ltd v Klopper 1996 (2) SA 237 (N) 241,referred to in De Ville, Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation (Interdoc 2000) 167.71The court added that an interpretation that......
  • The meaning of ‘binding offer’ in the Kariba case: Did creditors need to be protected from an alien cramdown?
    • South Africa
    • Juta Journal of Corporate Commercial Law & Practice No. , August 2019
    • August 16, 2019
    ...Vehicle Trading & Finance Co (Pty) Ltd v Klopper © Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd 85THE MEANING OF ‘BINDING OFFER’ IN THE KARIBA CASE1996 (2) SA 237 (N) 241). Since it is also ‘a wholesale rule of our law which requires a strict construction to be placed upon statutory provisions which interfer......
  • K O Motors CC v Gilindoda and Three Similar Cases
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...that vehicles with seating for more than 15 people did fall under para 9, and Dorbyl Vehicle Trading & Finance Co (Pty) Ltd v Klopper 1996 (2) SA 237 (N), in which it was held that they did not. C Held, that the intention of the Legislature was clearly to exclude road passenger vehicles wit......
  • Anix Trading TCC v Joga
    • South Africa
    • Witwatersrand Local Division
    • May 16, 2003
    ...raised in this court. The remarks of the learned judge were obiter. Hurt J in Dorbyl Vehicle Trading and Finance Co (Pty) Ltd v Klopper 1996 (2) SA 237 followed the unreported judgment of Pickering AJ in the Bam decision supra. (Hurt J gave his judgment 1 on 23 June 1993. The Bam appeal jud......
2 cases
  • K O Motors CC v Gilindoda and Three Similar Cases
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...that vehicles with seating for more than 15 people did fall under para 9, and Dorbyl Vehicle Trading & Finance Co (Pty) Ltd v Klopper 1996 (2) SA 237 (N), in which it was held that they did not. C Held, that the intention of the Legislature was clearly to exclude road passenger vehicles wit......
  • Anix Trading TCC v Joga
    • South Africa
    • Witwatersrand Local Division
    • May 16, 2003
    ...raised in this court. The remarks of the learned judge were obiter. Hurt J in Dorbyl Vehicle Trading and Finance Co (Pty) Ltd v Klopper 1996 (2) SA 237 followed the unreported judgment of Pickering AJ in the Bam decision supra. (Hurt J gave his judgment 1 on 23 June 1993. The Bam appeal jud......
2 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT