A Discussion of Certain Deeming Provisions in the Patent Regulations and of the Registrar of Patent’s Discretion to Grant Extensions of Time
Date | 24 May 2019 |
Pages | 75-86 |
Published date | 24 May 2019 |
Author | Alison Dyer |
A DISCUSSION OF CERTAIN
DEEMING PROVISIONS IN THE
PATENT REGULATIONS AND OF
THE REGISTRAR OF PATENT’S
DISCRETION TO GRANT
EXTENSIONS OF TIME
Consultant, Sp oor and Fisher
The recent judgment of the Cour t of the Commissioner of Patents in Vodacom
(Pty) Limited v The Registra r of Patents and Trustco Group Internat ional
(Pty) Limited1
the effect of a deeming provision in the Patent Regulations 1978 (the current
regulations) made in terms of the Patents Act 57 of 1978 (the current Act)
which is not in accordance with a requirement of the current Act, and
secondly what the powers of the registrar of patents are in relation to the
granting of extensions of ti me, both in terms of the curre nt Act and the current
regulations, and for substa ntive and procedural matters, before or after the
expiry of a time lim it, in terms of s 16(2) of the current Act. The manner
in which these two questions a re answered has impor tant and far reaching
consequences for patent applicants a nd patentees, as well as for third parties
with an interest in particular patent mat ters. This ar ticle deals critically with
both these questions.
Vodacom
The brief facts of the Vodacom case are as follows. The patentee (Trustco)
applied to restore its patent following the lapsing t hereof due to non-payment
of a renewal fee. Vodacom
a notice of opposition. The regulations govern ing restoration applications
days after the due date, the patentee applied to the regist rar for an extension
1 Vodacom (Pty) Ltd v T he Registrar of Patents a nd Trustco Group Inter national (Pty) Ltd [2 014]
ZAGPPHC 935.
75
(2015) IPLJ 75
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
To continue reading
Request your trial