A Cost-benefit Assessment of Refugee and Asylum-Seeking Women Reporting Sexual and Gender-based Violence in Uganda: Assessing Women’s Resilience as a Means to Protect their Ethno-religious Group

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Date01 June 2023
Pages1-29
Published date01 June 2023
DOI10.25159/2522-6800/13424
Article
Southern African Public Law
https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-68 00/13424
https://unisapressjournals.co.za/index.php/SAPL
ISSN 2522-6800 (Online ), ISSN 2219-6412 (Print)
Volume 38 | Number 1 | 2023 | #13424 | 29 pages
© Unisa Press 2023
A Cost-benefit Assessment of Refugee and Asylum-
Seeking Women Reporting Sexual and Gender-
based Violence in Uganda: Assessing Women’s
Resilience as a Means to Protect their Ethno-
religious Group
Jeremy Julian Sarkin
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9424-6874
Distinguished Research Professor and
member of CEDIS, NOVA University
of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal;
Research Fellow, Department of
Criminology, University of the Free
State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
JSarkin@post.harvard.edu
Tatiana Morais
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6636-6572
Researcher at CEDIS at NOVA
University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
tatiana.morais.cedis@novalaw.unl.pt
Abstract
Drawing from fieldwork carried out in Uganda, this empirical study is an
enquiry into women’s resilience in the face of sexual and gender-based violence
(SGBV) in the country. It asks why, and when, refugee and asylum-seeking
women decide to report (or not report) SGBV. It also enquires into the issues
that determine when they do so. The article shows that many participants did
not report cases of SGBV because of their concerns about protecting their ethno-
religious group and avoiding further discrimination and villainisation of their
communities. Survivors are also confronted with the ineffectiveness of
retributive justice, which is slow to punish perpetrators. This has led to the
establishment of a plea-bargaining system in the country, although this also falls
short of securing justice for SGBV survivors. Therefore, survivors often turn to
their communities to deal with instances of SGBV. However, most of these
community-based mechanisms reinforce patriarchal discrimination and
violence and often disregard women’s well-being, interests, and fundamental
rights. Women also have to deal with patriarchal pressure that places the
responsibility for community cohesion on the woman, as part of her traditional
role. This inhibits the ability to make a free and personal choice that could
benefit women as a social group.
Sarkin and Morais
2
Keywords: Uganda; women; sexual and gender-based violence; resilience; refugees;
asylum-seekers; ethnoreligious group
Introduction
Historically, the number of refugees and asylum seekers in Uganda has been high.1 Like
Uganda, many countries face significant social, economic and security hardships,2 yet
the country hosts one of the largest number of refugees and asylum seekers in the
world.3 Despite the ongoing mass influx of people from multiple African countries, the
country continues to choose to host refugees and asylum seekers.4 The open-door
policy, solidarity and responsibility of sharing, hosting and supporting refugees and
asylum seekers has led to Uganda being given the popular title of one of the best places
to be a refugee.5 However, there are those who argue that the situation is not as positive
as it professes to be.6
Uganda’s record of hosting refugees suggests that unity is a common cultural feature
among African states.7 There is a strong feeling of solidarity and community-based
social structures to address conflicts and social tensions.8 However, the problems that
refugees and asylum-seekers face are significant, especially that of sexual and gender-
based violence, the rate of which is high.9 In 2020 Uganda’s rates for SGBV by the
Afrobarometer were found to be fifty-six per cent for married women between the ages
of fifteen and forty-nine. It was also found that more than a third of all women had
endured sexual violence, with twenty-eight per cent occuring in the previous year.10
1 Jafali Kasozi, ‘The Refugee Crisis and the Situation in Sub-Saharan Africa.’ (2017) ÖGFE Policy
Brief 16.
2 Mwangu Alex Ronald, ‘An Assessment of Economic and Environmental Impacts of Refugees in
Nakivale, Uganda’ (2022) 11(3) Migration and Development 433449.
3 Ruth Nnadi Ebere and David Mwesigwa, ‘The Effectiveness of Social Inclusion of Refugees in
Kiryandongo Refugee Settlement Community of Midwestern Uganda’ (2021) 2(2) Asian Journal of
Sustainable Business 7694.
4 Nastassja White and others, ‘Open the Doors: Towards Complete Freedom of Movement for Human
Rights Defenders in Exile in Uganda’ (2020) Journal of Human Rights Practice 11041128.
5 ‘Uganda: “One of the Best Places to be a Refugee”.’ BBC News (13 May 2016)
accessed 20 M arch 2023).
6 Joe Oloka-Onyango, ‘Exploring the Multiple Paradoxes and Challenges of Uganda's Refugee Law,
Policies and Practice.’ (2022) 9 Transnation al Human Rights Review 1.
7 See generally Mathew J Gibney, ‘Forced Migration, Engineer ed Regionalism and Justice Between
States’ in Susan Kneebone and Felicity Rawlings-San aei (ed), New Regionalism and Asylum Seekers:
Challenges Ahead (New York, Berghahn Books 2007) 57–7.
8 Alex Taylor, Daniella Rosner and Mikael Wiberg, ‘Global Mobilities’ (2011) 28(2) Interaction 67.
9 See also Diane F Morof and others, ‘A Cross-sectional Survey on Gender-based Violence and Mental
Health Among Female Urban Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Kampala, Uganda’ (2014) 127(2)
International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 138143.
10 Majority of Ugandans See Domestic Violence as a Private – Not Criminal – Matter’ (23 January
2023) Afrobarometer AD593 <https://www.afrobarometer.org/wp-ontent/uploads/2023/01/AD593-

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT