Constitutionalism and constitutional amendment in Lesotho : a case for substantive limitations

Published date01 January 2014
AuthorK.K. Mohau
Pages1-32
Date01 January 2014
DOI10.10520/EJC177126
CONSTITUTIONALISM AND
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT IN
LESOTHO: A CASE FOR SUBSTANTIVE
LIMITATIONS
Mohau, K.K.*
Abstract
The idea of a limited government encapsulated in the concept
of constitutionalism is, like all ideals, capable of realization
to differing degrees from country to country, and even at
different times in one country’s constitutional development.
Constitutional amendment is indispensable to constitutional
development but, like a double edged sword, the process is
capable of either helping or hurting a country’s project to
build a constitutional state. This paper evaluates the
amendment process provided for in the Constitution of
Lesotho. It makes a case for adopting substantive limitations
to the Constitution’s amendment as a means of ensuring the
continued respect for constitutionalism.
Introduction
The quest for a limited government bears a long history and cuts
across civilizations. More than two thousand years ago Aristotle
wrote that “the rule of law… is preferable to that of any man.”
1
*BA (Law), LL B (NUL); LL M (Warwick). Lecturer, Faculty of Law, NUL.
1
Aristotle, (384-322 BC) Politics, (Book Three) (Benjamin Jowett Translation) 53.
Before Aristotle, another Greek philosopher, Plato (428-347 BC) had in his work,
Laws ,IV 715d said,
“[w]here the law is subject to some other authority and has none of its
own, the collapse of the state, in my view, is not far off; but if law is the
master of the government and the government is its slave, the situation is
full of promise and men enjoy the blessings that the gods shower on the
state.”
2 LLJ. NO. 21 Special Edition
Thomas Paine described government as a necessary evil.
2
It is
necessary for the protection of individual and collective rights; for
the settlement of disputes; the maintenance of peace and for
repelling external threats.
3
On the negative side is its penchant for
the abuse of the immense powers of legislation, adjudication and
execution that it commands. Consequently, the question as to how
best to rein in these powers has occupied the minds of many people
for generations and different scholars have provided different ways
of doing so.
The Basotho of old dealt with the problem of errant rulers through
the practice of ho reteletsa monyako (to switch allegiances) in terms of
which dissatisfied subjects would leave one chief for another
perceived to be a better ruler endowed with botho (humanity).
4
The concept of constitutionalism is one of the various ideas
proffered about keeping the government in check.
5
Constitutionalism requires that government should operate under,
and observe, limitations established by a supreme constitution.
6
This means that tampering with a country’s constitution may,
depending on the nature of the changes made, either augment or
diminish the observance of constitutionalism.
7
This paper briefly examines the nature of the concept of
constitutionalism and its applicability to Lesotho. It looks at the
2
Thomas Pain e, Common Sen se, (Philadelphia: R. Bell, 1776)69; See also B.O.
Nwabueze, Constitutionalism in Emergent States, (London: C. Hurst, 1973)1.
3
See, for example, the United States Declaration of Independence of 4 July 1776 a nd
paragraph 2 of the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen (1789).
4
Hugh Ashton, The Basuto, (London: Oxford University Press,1957) 217;
NtsuMokhehle (ed), Moshoeshoe 1 Profile Se Moshoeshoe, (1976) 17-19.
5
Others include the rule of law, independence of the judiciary, separation of
powers and checks and balances.
6
Iain Currie and John de Waal, The New Constitutional and Administrative Law,
(Lansdowne: Juta Law, 2001) 9; B.O. Nwabueze, Constitutionalism in the Emergent
States, (London: C. Hurst & Co., 1973)9.
7
S. Butler, “The Constitutional Court Certification Judgments: The 1996
Constitutional Bills, Their Amending Provisions, and the Constitutional Principles”
114(1997) SALJ 703 at 714.
Constitutionalism and Constitutional Amendment in Lesotho 3
process of constitutional amendment and examines the relationship
between constitutionalism and constitutional amendment. The
paper also discusses the nature of constitutional amendment under
the Constitution of Lesotho and recommends substantive
limitations to all future amendments of the 1993 Constitution.
The Nature of Constitutionalism
The concept of constitutionalism is defined in descriptive as well as
prescriptive terms. In its earlier descriptive sense, the term had been
confined to a description of the rules governing the establishment
and functioning of government institutions.
8
On the other hand, the modern prescriptive sense of
constitutionalism lays down minimum standards to be met for
constitutionalism to obtain in a country. It prescribes
constitutionally determined structural, procedural and substantive
limitations on government.
9
In this sense, constitutionalism is
distinguishable from constitutionality which merely means
governing according to the precepts of the constitution. It is,
accordingly, possible to have constitutionality without
constitutionalism. This is what many African countries experienced
following the abrogation of independence constitutions and their
replacement with constitutions that were touted as designed to fast
track development and be more in touch with the unique African
realities. In practice, these constitutions proved useless in
restraining African rulers from abusing power as aptly observed by
Okoth Ogendo.
10
Apartheid South Africa ensured the legalization of
the universally abhorred system of apartheid through the
constitution that excluded the African majority from participating
in the country’s mainstream political life.
8
See Iain Currie and Johan de Waal, The New Constitutional & Administrative Law
Volume One, p12.
9
For a discussion of the evolution of constitutionalism over the yearssee, Charles
Howard McIlwain, Constitutionalism, Ancient and Modern, (1947).
10
H.G.W. Okoth-Ogendo, Constitutions without Constitutionalism: An African
political paradox” in Douglas Greenberg, S.N. Kartz, B. Oliviero and S.C. Wheatly
(Eds), Constitutionalism and Democracy (New York: OUP) Chapter 4.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT