Company Unique Finance (Pty) Ltd and Another v Johannesburg Northern Metropolitan Local Council and Another
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 practice notes
-
Northern Metropolitan Local Council v Company Unique Finance (Pty) Ltd and Others
...law D Southern Africa Company Unique Finance (Pty) Ltd and Another v Johannesburg Northern Metropolitan Local Council and Another 2011 (1) SA 440 (GSJ): reversed on Glofinco v Absa Bank Ltd t/a United Bank 2002 (6) SA 470 (SCA): dicta in paras [13] and [20] applied E In re SS Winton 1938 CP......
-
Optic Powerlines (Pty) Ltd v Hattingh
...it should be reduced. (See Company Unique Finance (Pty) Ltd & Another v Johannesburg Northern Metropolitan Local Council & Another 2011 (1) SA 440 (GSJ) at 467G – 468J.) In casu and having found that the Court order does not contain a penalty provision, I deem it unnecessary to deal any fur......
-
Northern Metropolitan Local Council v Company Unique Finance (Pty) Ltd and Others
...[*] Reported as Company Unique Finance (Pty) Ltd and Another v Johannesburg Northern Metropolitan Local Council and Another 2011 (1) SA 440 (GSJ) — [5] During his testimony Mosiane confirmed that he and Van Wyk attended a security conference over the period 26 to 30 October 1998. [6] Hely-H......
3 cases
-
Northern Metropolitan Local Council v Company Unique Finance (Pty) Ltd and Others
...law D Southern Africa Company Unique Finance (Pty) Ltd and Another v Johannesburg Northern Metropolitan Local Council and Another 2011 (1) SA 440 (GSJ): reversed on Glofinco v Absa Bank Ltd t/a United Bank 2002 (6) SA 470 (SCA): dicta in paras [13] and [20] applied E In re SS Winton 1938 CP......
-
Optic Powerlines (Pty) Ltd v Hattingh
...it should be reduced. (See Company Unique Finance (Pty) Ltd & Another v Johannesburg Northern Metropolitan Local Council & Another 2011 (1) SA 440 (GSJ) at 467G – 468J.) In casu and having found that the Court order does not contain a penalty provision, I deem it unnecessary to deal any fur......
-
Northern Metropolitan Local Council v Company Unique Finance (Pty) Ltd and Others
...[*] Reported as Company Unique Finance (Pty) Ltd and Another v Johannesburg Northern Metropolitan Local Council and Another 2011 (1) SA 440 (GSJ) — [5] During his testimony Mosiane confirmed that he and Van Wyk attended a security conference over the period 26 to 30 October 1998. [6] Hely-H......
3 provisions
-
Northern Metropolitan Local Council v Company Unique Finance (Pty) Ltd and Others
...law D Southern Africa Company Unique Finance (Pty) Ltd and Another v Johannesburg Northern Metropolitan Local Council and Another 2011 (1) SA 440 (GSJ): reversed on Glofinco v Absa Bank Ltd t/a United Bank 2002 (6) SA 470 (SCA): dicta in paras [13] and [20] applied E In re SS Winton 1938 CP......
-
Optic Powerlines (Pty) Ltd v Hattingh
...it should be reduced. (See Company Unique Finance (Pty) Ltd & Another v Johannesburg Northern Metropolitan Local Council & Another 2011 (1) SA 440 (GSJ) at 467G – 468J.) In casu and having found that the Court order does not contain a penalty provision, I deem it unnecessary to deal any fur......
-
Northern Metropolitan Local Council v Company Unique Finance (Pty) Ltd and Others
...[*] Reported as Company Unique Finance (Pty) Ltd and Another v Johannesburg Northern Metropolitan Local Council and Another 2011 (1) SA 440 (GSJ) — [5] During his testimony Mosiane confirmed that he and Van Wyk attended a security conference over the period 26 to 30 October 1998. [6] Hely-H......