Comment: The volitional component of dolus eventualis

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Citation(2003) 16 SACJ 207
AuthorStephen de la Harpe
Pages207-211
Published date03 September 2019
Date03 September 2019
Comments
207
The volitional component
of
dolus eventualis
STEPHEN DE LA HARPE AND THARIEN VAN DER WALT
Potchefstroomse Universiteit vir Christelike Hoer Onderwys
Introduction
In the unreported judgment of
S v Dhlamini
(case no CC 27
6
/
9
9/AL)
delivered in the circuit court of the Witwatersrand Local Division, Schabort J
found four gang members who participated in an armed robbery guilty of,
inter alia, murder. The police killed one of the deceased, a gang member,
during the robbery. The remaining four gang members were found guilty of,
inter alia, the murder of their partner in crime.
Facts of the case
A gang of five men planned to rob a cash loan business in Potchefstroom. An
informant who knew about the planned robbery informed the police and the
police set a trap for the prospective robbers.
When the gang members arrived, the police confronted them and shots
were exchanged. One police member and one of the gang members were
killed. The surviving four gang members were inter alia charged on two
counts of murder: the murder of the police officer, who was presumably
killed by a gang member, one Ramngcani, and the murder of the said
Ramngcani who was killed by the police's shots.
Mens Rea
The court dealt in particular with the question of mens rea. The court decided
that it was trite law that when an offence like this one is committed by a
group of persons, they have a common intention. It does not really matter
who drives the car, who shoots or who does what in obtaining the common
goal. All the members in the group have the same culpability.
The killing of the police officer by Ramngcani was murder. The killing of
Ramngcani by the police, however, was lawful. The question was whether
the accused could be found guilty of murdering their fellow gang member
Ramngcani. In order to answer this question the issue of
mens rea
becomes
pertinent.
(2003) 16 SACJ 207
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT