Civil Procedure
Citation | 2021/2022 YSAL 138 |
Published date | 14 April 2023 |
Pages | 138-175 |
Author | van Loggerenberg, D. |
Date | 14 April 2023 |
138
1. INTRODUCTION
During the past year various amendments to the Rules of the Supreme
Court of Appeal, the Uniform Rules of Court, and the magistrates’ courts
rules came into operation.
In addition, the Minister of Justice and Correctional Supervision
published various notices creating magisterial districts and establishing
district courts in various provinces, all of which are with effect from
1 April 2022, and numerous practice direct ives dealing with various aspects
of court procedure were published by the Judges President of most of the
divisions of the High Court.
The superior courts delivered judgments about various aspects of civil
procedure. In some judgments, well-established principles were reiterated;
in others, new principles in respe ct of, among others, the application of rules
of court were laid down.
A number of articles dealing with different aspects of civil procedure
were publ ished.
2. LEGISLATION
2.1 CRIMINAL AND RELATED MATTERS AMENDMENT ACT 12 OF
2021
On 28 January 2022, the Criminal and Related Matters Amendment Act1
was published.2 This statute amends the Magistrates’ Courts Act3 and the
∗SC; B Iuris LLB (PU for CHE) LLD (UPE); Member of the Pretoria Bar; formerly
Professor of Law, University of Port Elizabeth; Extraordinary Professor of Law, University
of Pretoria; Marcel Storme Chair Professor of Law, University of Ghent, Belgium (2016–17).
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1086-9642.
112 of 2021.
2GG 45822 of 28 January 2022.
332 of 1944.
Civil ProcedureCivil Procedure
Danie van Loggerenberg*
2021/2022 YSAL 138
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
CIvIL proCedure139
Superior Courts Act4 to provide for the appointment of intermediaries and
the giving of evidence through intermediaries in proceedings other than
criminal proceedings and matters connected therewith. It will come into
operation on a date to be proclaimed.
2.2 MAGISTERIAL DISTRICTS, DISTRICT COURTS AND PLACES
FOR THE HOLDING OF MAGISTRATES’ COURTS
On 30 March 2022 the Minister of Justice and Correctional Supervision
published the following notices, all of which are with effect from 1 April
2022:5
(a) GN 928 converting certain places for the holdi ng of magistrates’ courts;
(b) GN 929 creating magisterial districts and establishing district courts
in the Free State Province;
(c) GN 930 creating magisterial districts and establishing district courts
in the KwaZulu-Natal Province;
(d) GN 931 creating magisterial districts and establishing district courts
in the Eastern Cape Province;
(e) GN 932 creating magisterial districts and establishing district courts
in the Western Cape Province.
2.3 LOWER COURTS BILL
On 29 April 2022, the Minister of Justice a nd Correctional Services published
a draft Lower Courts Bill [Bxx-2022] for public consultation. The aim of
the draft Bill is to make provision for the establishment of lower courts,
comprising regional courts, district courts and municipal courts, and to
repeal the Magistrates’ Cour ts Act.
2.4 AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF
APPEAL
On 1 February 2022 rules 8 (Record) and 10 (Heads of argume nt) of the Rules
of the Supreme Court of Appeal were amended.6
On 8 July 2022 rules 15 (Legal assistance to indigent persons) and 18
(Attorneys’ fees) of the Supreme Court of Appeal were amended.7
410 of 2013.
5GG 46132 of 30 March 2022.
6GN R1602, GG 45645 of 17 December 2021.
7GN R2135, GG 46475 of 3 June 2022.
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
YeArbooK oF south AFrICAN LAW
140
2.5 AMENDMENTS TO THE UNIFORM RULES OF COURT
On 1 February 2022, rules 17 (Summons) and 37 (Pre-trial Conference) of
the Uniform Rules of Court were amended, rule 38(9) (Procuring evidence
for trial) was added, and rule 57 (De Lunatico Inquirendo, appointment of
curators in respect of person s under disability and release f rom curatorship)
and forms 9 (Summons) and 10 (Combined summons) of the First Schedule
were substituted.8
An evaluation of the amendments to rules 37 and 38 demonstrates the
following:
(a)Under rule 37(6)(i) the minutes of the pre-trial conference must now
also include any agreement between the parties regarding whether
evidence is required to be taken on commission or by way of
audiovisual link in t erms of rule 38 of the Uniform Rules of Court.
(b)Rul e 38(9)(a) provides that a cour t may, on application on notice by a ny
party and where it appears convenient or in the interests of justice,
make an order for evidence to be taken th rough audiovisual link.
(c)Under rule 38(9) an order for evidence to be taken through audiovisual
link will be made where it appears to the court to be convenient or in
the interests of justice to mak e such an order.
The word ‘convenient’ denotes not only facility or expedience or ease, but
also appropriateness in the sense that the procedure would be convenient
if, in all the circ umstances of the case, it appears to be fitting and fa ir to the
parties concerned. It is submitted that the order should be made if taking
evidence through audiovisual li nk is convenient to the parties, the witness es
and the court.
The interests of justice is a broad concept a nd the question whether it will
be in the interests of justice for evidence to be taken through audiovisual
link wil l have to be decided in the light of the facts of eac h case.
In Uramin (Incorporated in British Columbia) t/a Areva Resources Southern
Africa v Perie,9 it was held to be convenient and in the interests of justice to
vary the general trial procedure under rule 39(9), and receive the evidence
of two witnesses, with their consent, from abroad via video link under
circumsta nces where their evidence was vital to the defendant’s defence but
both of them were no longer in its employ and not willing to travel from
abroad to the seat of the trial cour t in Johannesburg in order to testify.
In Rand Gold & Exploration Co Ltd v Gold Fields Operations Ltd,10 the
applicants applied to the High Court for the court to issue letters to certain
foreign judicial authorities requesting them to subpoena witnesses in
8GN R1603, GG 45645 of 17 December 2021.
92017 (1) SA 236 (GJ).
102020 (3) SA 251 (GJ).
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
