Challenges with implementing political leadership and decision-making participatory rights for women in Ethiopia

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Citation(2018) 5(2) Journal of Comparative Law in Africa 45
Published date16 August 2019
AuthorAbegaz, S.T.
Pages45-72
Date16 August 2019
45
CHALLENGES WITH IMPLEMENTING
POLITICAL LEADERSHIP AND DECISION-
MAKING PARTICIPATORY RIGHTS FOR
WOMEN IN ETHIOPIA
Solomon Tekle Abegaz* and Workantif Desalegne Asfaw**
Abstract
Globally, several interventions have been made to enablewomen to participate in
political leadership and decision-making positions. However, women remain under-
represented in these positions. The aim of this article is to assess the challenges
with implementing political leadership and decision-making participatory rights
for women using Bahirdar city administration as a case study.The findings of the
study show that women face low considerations in political leadership and decision-
making, and that they hold lower non-decision making and leadership positions
in the city administration. More importantly, the findings show that a wide range
of socio-cultural attitudes, conflict of balance between domestic and public life,lack
of confidence and unwillingness by women themselves, and others prevent a more
equal representation of women in the city administration executive power structure.
Therefore, effor ts, such asthe creation of an enabling environment to enhance women’s
participation in politics, the provision of women-related civic projects, the creation of
awareness among young girls in schools through civic and ethical education about the
importance of women’s political representation are recommended to enhance women’s
political participation in the city in order to contribute to ensuring gender parity in
the country in accordance to AU 2063 Agenda.
Keywords: Bahirdar, decision making, political leadership, women, women’s
political participatory rights.
Résumé
Globalement, plusieurs interventions ont été faites pour permettre aux femmes
de participer aux postes de direction et de prise de décision politique. Cependant,
les femmes restent sous-représentées dans ces postes. Le but de cet article est
d’évaluer les défis dans la mise en œuvre du leadership et de la prise de décision
politique en ce qui concerne les droits de participation pour les femmes, en utilisant
l’administration de la ville de Bahirdar comme une étude de cas. Les constats de
l’étude démontrent que les femmes sont confrontées à une faible prise en compte
dans la direction et la prise de décision politique, et qu’elles occupent des postes
inferieurs non-décisionnaires et de direction dans l’administration des villes. Plus
* LLD (Pretor ia), LLM (Addis Ababa), LLB (Addis Ababa) and Assistant Professor of Law, School
of Law, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. Email: solomomte@gmail.com. Our thanks go to
Judy Price for reviewing and commenting on the first draft of the article.
** LLM (Gondar), LLB (Addis Ababa) and Judge at City Appellate Court, Amhara National
Regional State, Wollo, Ethiopia. Email: workantif.desalegne@yahoo.com.
(2018) 5(2) Journal of Comparative Law in Africa 45
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
46JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE LAW IN AFRICA VOL 5, NO 2, 2018
important encore, les constats montrent qu’un large éventail d’attitudes socio-
culturels, un déséquilibre entre la vie familiale et la vie publique, un manque de
confiance et un manque de volonté de la part des femmes elles-mêmes et les autres
empêchent une représentation plus égale des femmes dans la structure du pouvoir
exécutif de l’administration de la ville. Ainsi, les efforts, tels que la conscientisation
des jeunes filles dans des écoles, par le biais de l’enseignement civique et éthique
relative à l’importance de la représentation des femmes dans le domaine politique
sont recommandées pour améliorer la participation politique des femmes dans la
ville afin de contribuer à la réalisation de l’égalité des sexes au pays, conformément
à l’Agenda 2063 de l’UA.
Mots clés: Bahirdar, prise de décision, direction politique, femmes, droits de
participation politique des femmes
Introduction
Over the years, the issue of women’s political rights and their equal
participation in political leadership and in decision making has become
increasingly prominent in world politics. This topic has received varied
treatment by the United Nations (UN) and its specialised agencies.1
Sustainable developmentin a society cannot be brought about without
the full and unreserved participation of both women and men. Such a
balanced development should also call for the elimination of all forms
of discrimination against women. After the establishment of the UN
in 1946, there was increasing recognition among the international
community of women’s historic exclusion from structures of power.
The principle of the equality of men and women was recognised in the
1945 UN Charter, and again later in the 1948 Universal Declaration
of Human Rights (UDHR). The International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights (ICCPR) went further to oblige the state parties to
ensure the ef fectiveness of women’s political par ticipation in public af fairs
without discrimination on the ground of sex.2 The UN also adopted a
Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against
Women (CEDAW). It concerns women’s access to decision making in
political and public life. The Beijing Declaration and Platfor m of Action
(BDPA) also deal extensively with the issue of women in power and
decision mak ing. It requires government s to attain a 30% benchm ark for
women’s representation in al l public decision-maki ng positions. Further,
1 For instance, the UN has dedicated Goal 5 in its Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
to achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls. See UN, ‘Goal 5: Achieve gender
equality and empower all women and girls’, viewed 31 October, 2018, from https://www.un.org/
sustainabledevelopment/gender-equality/; UN Women, ‘Women and the Sustainable Development
Goals (SDGs)’, viewed 31 October, 2018, from http://www.unwomen.org/en/news/in-focus/
women-and-the-sdgs.
2 Inter national Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 999 UNTS 171 (1966), articles 3 and 25.
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex