Case Comments: The Interpretation and Application of Section 191(12) of the Labour Relations Act: Bracks NO v Rand Water

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Citation(2011) 23 SA Merc LJ 504
Pages504-512
Published date25 May 2019
AuthorMoseki Maleka
Date25 May 2019
Case Comments
The Interpretation and Application of Section
191(12) of the Labour Relations Act:
Bracks NO v Rand Water
MOSEKI MALEKA
University of South Africa
RAMOKGADI NKHUMISE
North-West University, Mafikeng
1 Introduction
In Bracks NO and Another v Rand Water and Another (2010) 31 ILJ 897
(LAC) the Labour Appeal Court (‘LAC’) had an opportunity to provide
guidance and clarity for the proper interpretation of section 191(12) of the
Labour Relations Act 66 of 1995 (‘LRA’). The question to be answered was
whether the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration
(‘CCMA’) has jurisdiction to hear a dispute concerning retrenchment of a
single employee for want of compliance with procedural requirements of
section 189 of the LRA.
On dismissal, employees must follow the procedures and remedies set out
in the LRA to challenge their dismissals. Section 185 of the LRA provides
that every employee has the right not to be unfairly dismissed and/or
subjected to unfair labour practices. Where an employee claims that he or she
has been unfairly dismissed on the ground of misconduct or incapacity, the
dismissal dispute is referred to the CCMA for conciliation and if the matter
remains unresolved, it must be referred for compulsory arbitration either to
the CCMA, or a Bargaining Council in terms of section 195(5)(a) of the LRA.
However, in the case of a dismissal based on the employer’s operational
reasons (retrenchments) an employee who alleges that he or she was unfairly
dismissed must refer the matter for conciliation, and if the matter remains
unresolved it must be referred for adjudication to the Labour Court in terms of
section 191(5)(b)(ii) of the LRA or for an arbitration to the CCMA or
Bargaining Council.
Section 191(12) of the LRA in contrast to section 191(5)(b)(ii), provides
guidance to an employee who is dismissed based on the employer’s
operational reasons following a consultation procedure in terms of section 189
of the LRA to elect to refer the dispute either to the Labour Court for
504
(2011) 23 SA Merc LJ 504
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT