Case Comments: Sex Workers and the Right to Fair Labour Practices: Kylie v Commissioner for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration

JurisdictionSouth Africa
AuthorLinda Muswaka
Published date25 May 2019
Pages533-541
Date25 May 2019
Sex Workers and the Right to Fair Labour
Practices: Kylie v Commissioner for Conciliation
Mediation and Arbitration
LINDA MUSWAKA
North West University
1 Introduction
In South Africa, sex work is criminalised by section 20(1A)(a)ofthe
Sexual Offences Act 23 of 1957, as amended by the Criminal Law (Sexual
Offences and Related Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007. This provision
states that ‘[a]ny person 18 years or older who . . . has unlawful carnal
intercourse, or commits an act of indecency, with any other person for reward
. . . shall be guilty of an offence’. Archaically, section 1 of the Sexual Offences
Act still def‌ines ‘unlawful carnal intercourse’ as ‘carnal intercourse other than
between husband and wife’. The Sexual Offences Act has been amended to
explicitly include penalties for people (the clients) who use the services of sex
workers. The creation of this offence follows the suggestion to this effect in
the minority judgment of S v Jordan (2002 (6) SA 642 (CC) para [43]).
Section 11 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and Related Matters)
Amendment Act states:
‘A person (‘‘A’’)who unlawfully and intentionally engages the services of a person 18 years or
older (‘‘B’’), for f‌inancial or other reward, favour or compensation to (‘‘B’’) or to a third
person (‘‘C’’)—
(a) for the purpose of engaging in a sexual act with ‘‘B’’,irrespective of whether the sexual
act is committed or not; or
(b) by committing a sexual act with ‘‘B’’, is guilty of engaging the sexual services of a
person 18 years or older.’
The Sexual Offences Act and the Criminal Law (Sexual Offences and
Related Matters) Amendment Act accordingly work in tandem to prohibit sex
work.
A fairly recent case that involved important issues pertaining to sex
workers and their right to fair labour practices was Kylie v Commissioner for
Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others 2010 (4) SA 383 (LAC).
The case brings together a number of issues, ranging from the constitutional
protection of human rights, the protection of labour rights, and HIV/AIDS to
the role of the law in enforcing moral or religious values. In this note, I shall
conf‌ine my discussion to the labour-law issues. In particular, I shall examine
the interpretation of the term ‘employee’ and the criminalisation of sex work.
This judgment is considered against this background to determine its potential
impact and inf‌luence on other illegal employees, and, generally, on law
reform pertaining to adult sex work.
533
(2011) 23 SA Merc LJ 533
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT