Book Review: The Selfless Constitution: Experimentalism and flourishing as foundations of South Africa's basic law
Jurisdiction | South Africa |
Published date | 16 August 2019 |
Author | Henk Botha |
Pages | 225-229 |
Date | 16 August 2019 |
225
BOOK REVIEWS / BOEKRESENSIES
The Seless Constitution: Experimentalism and Flourishing as
Foundations of South Africa’s Basic Law by S Woolman. Juta & Co
Cape Town 2013. xv & 632 pp. ISBN 9781485100072. Price R395.00
(soft cover)
Stu Woolman’s new book is an ambitious work, which expounds a theory
of constitutionalism which brea ks with traditional understa ndings of the self,
the social and constitut ional law, and seeks to rec onceive them in a number of
ways. This it does by drawing on a wide variety of scientic elds, theoretical
endeavours, analogies and meta phors. To mention but a few examples: global
neuronal workspace theor y and experi mental philosophy are enli sted to
problematise and point beyond metaphysical conception s of selfhood and
individual free dom; the notions of feedback mechanisms, choice architecture
and social capital are employed to rethi nk the social and the possibil ity of
social change; and concepts such as shar ed constitutional i nterpretat ion and
participator y bubbles are developed as a way out of the stale oppositions that
tend to character ise constitutional thought. Th roughout, the author takes great
pains to relate these diverse c oncepts and theories to each other, and to weave
the different stra nds into a coherent and defensible theor y of constitutional
adjudication.
The rst part of the a rgument centres on a critique of the assumption
that the individual self is u nitary a nd coherent and shapes her own des tiny
in a conscious, rational ma nner. According to the author, this conce ption of
the self is r mly entrenched in folk psychology and has roots in outmoded
metaphysical understand ings of volition and freedom. To this he juxtaposes
the more constraine d and fragmente d understand ing of the self that emerges
from contemporar y studies in di sciplines ranging f rom neurological studies
to social theory. These stud ies suggest that the indiv idual possesses far less
freedom than is com monly supposed, and t hat traditional not ions of the self
radically underest imate the extent to which the self is conditioned by cultur al
givens and social practices. However, these outmoded u nderstandi ngs are
far from dead, and t he author argues that t heir tenacious hold is visible in
a number of judgments. For example, S v Jordan 2002 6 SA 642 (CC) is
critiqued for its commitment to metaphysical notions of autonomy which
preclude an understa nding of the extent to which sex workers’ alternatives are
dramatically rest ricted by a social context of poverty and exploitation. Prince
v President, Cape Law S ociety 2002 2 SA 794 (CC) is similarly criticise d for
its overemphasis on the choice made by Rastafa rians, and its disregard for the
“arational, constit utive attachments t hat form the better pa rt of our identity”
(118) .
Following from this crit ique, the author p roposes a conce ption of human
ourishing which, he argues, is central to the Constitution of the Republic
of South Africa, 1996 (“the Constit ution”). Unlike metaphysical notions
of freedom, this vision of ourishing attaches great impor tance to the
(2014) 25 Stell LR 225
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
To continue reading
Request your trial