Black v Joffe

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Judgment Date26 October 2006
Citation2007 (3) SA 171 (C)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • Esorfranki (Pty) Ltd v Mopani District Municipality
    • South Africa
    • 24 June 2021
    ...– [142]). Cases cited Southern Africa Administrateur, Natal v Trust Bank van Afrika Bpk 1979 (3) SA 824 (A): referred to Black v Joffe 2007 (3) SA 171 (C) ([2007] 2 All SA 161): referred to Dickson and Co v Levy (1894) 11 SC 33: referred to 2022 (2) SA p357 Esorfranki Pipelines (Pty) Ltd an......
  • Esorfranki (Pty) Ltd v Mopani District Municipality
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...– [142]). Cases cited Southern Africa Administrateur, Natal v Trust Bank van Afrika Bpk 1979 (3) SA 824 (A): referred to Black v Joffe 2007 (3) SA 171 (C) ([2007] 2 All SA 161): referred to Dickson and Co v Levy (1894) 11 SC 33: referred to 2022 (2) SA p357 Esorfranki Pipelines (Pty) Ltd an......
  • How to make sense of the civil prohibition of hate speech in terms of the Promotion of Equality and Prevention of Unfair Discrimination Act 4 of 2000
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Southern African Public Law No. 34-1, December 2019
    • 3 December 2019
    ...Minister of Police v Mbilini 1983 (3) SA 705 (A) para 715F-716E; Delange v Costa 1989 (2) SA 857 (A) para 860I-861A. 129 Black v Joffe 2007 (3) SA 171 (C) para 39. 130 The attainment of a particular consequence which the appellant intends to bring about—Black v Joffe (n 129) para 39. 131 A ......
  • Shabalala v Metrorail
    • South Africa
    • 9 June 2006
    ...be vulnerable to lawsuits should such attacks occur on their premises or property, no matter how remote the ensuing damages might be. J 2007 (3) SA p171 Horn There may be a duty on the defendant to ensure, wherever possible, that adequate security is available. However, that is only A one o......
3 cases
  • Esorfranki (Pty) Ltd v Mopani District Municipality
    • South Africa
    • 24 June 2021
    ...– [142]). Cases cited Southern Africa Administrateur, Natal v Trust Bank van Afrika Bpk 1979 (3) SA 824 (A): referred to Black v Joffe 2007 (3) SA 171 (C) ([2007] 2 All SA 161): referred to Dickson and Co v Levy (1894) 11 SC 33: referred to 2022 (2) SA p357 Esorfranki Pipelines (Pty) Ltd an......
  • Esorfranki (Pty) Ltd v Mopani District Municipality
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...– [142]). Cases cited Southern Africa Administrateur, Natal v Trust Bank van Afrika Bpk 1979 (3) SA 824 (A): referred to Black v Joffe 2007 (3) SA 171 (C) ([2007] 2 All SA 161): referred to Dickson and Co v Levy (1894) 11 SC 33: referred to 2022 (2) SA p357 Esorfranki Pipelines (Pty) Ltd an......
  • Shabalala v Metrorail
    • South Africa
    • 9 June 2006
    ...be vulnerable to lawsuits should such attacks occur on their premises or property, no matter how remote the ensuing damages might be. J 2007 (3) SA p171 Horn There may be a duty on the defendant to ensure, wherever possible, that adequate security is available. However, that is only A one o......
1 books & journal articles