Beyond Law Making: Law Enforcement as a Critical Tool In Tackling Fulani Herdsmen Crisis In Nigeria

AuthorO.B. Ekundayo
DOI10.10520/ejc-lesotho_v27_n1_a4
Published date01 January 2022
Date01 January 2022
Pages81-159
BEYOND LAW MAKING: LAW ENFORCEMENT AS A
CRITICAL TOOL IN TACKLING FULANI HERDSMEN CRISIS
IN NIGERIA
Ekundayo O.B.*
Abstract
The communities in the middle-belt region of Nigeria have been
exposed to violent attacks by Fulani herdsmen for about two
decades. The attacks to which thousands of people have lost their
lives and several other displaced have gradually degenerated to
a state of chaos threatening national security. The on-going
security turmoil in the middle belt mirrors the failure of law
enforcement and implementation in the country. Whereas these
attacks amount to criminal acts including murder,
manslaughter and arson there has been no commendable effort
towards arrest, trial and sentencing of culprits. The link
between crime and punishment is severed hence difficulty of
ending the attacks. The inadequacy of criminal enforcement and
punishment which accounts for the high rate of crime and
insecurity in the country amount to breach of the constitutional
obligation of government to preserve security of lives and
properties and fundamental human rights of the people. This
study examines Fulani herdsmen attacks from the perspective of
criminal law enforcement as tool for preserving social order and
security. Although the government of the various concerned
middle belt/North Central states have enacted anti-gracing
laws, law enactment alone will not suffice to curb crime hence
the incessant nature of the attacks. The aim of this study is to
proffer proactive solutions to the farmer-herder killings in the
middle belt region of Nigeria. This is with the objective of
ascertaining factors responsible for the failure of existing
criminal legal system in tackling societal crimes incidental to
the herdsmen crisis and to deter further attacks. The study
82 LLJ Vol. 27 NO. 1
examines various narratives to the Fulani-herdsmen crisis and
theoretical perspectives on crime and punishment. The study
found the inadequacy of law enactment in the country, the
current federal policing structure, erosion of communal dispute
settlement system and general lack of political will as
responsible for the problem. The study recommends review of
the criminal justice system to update relevant laws and proper
implement of applicable law laws as the crimes committed in the
course of the attacks are all recognised under existing laws.
Keywords: Collective Agreement, Collective Bargaining, Employee,
Labour, Nigeria,
INTRODUCTION
In, seeks to as of employment.
1
Criminal justice system exists in every political society to maintain
social order. It sets the limits of behaviour that is acceptable, specify
penalty for exceeding those limits and prevent individuals from
resorting to jungle justice or revenge. Behaviours outside the
acceptable limits often constitute crime or misdemeanour. Crime is
a breach of societal norm which attracts punishment. Modern
society exists as a political order where the people submit their
personal liberty to government and accept the restrained liberty
specified by political authorities. Hence every member of the
society enjoys equal legal rights and liberty. Therefore when a crime
is committed it affects the personal liberty of the victim which was
usurped by the suspect for selfish interest as well as the societal
*Ph.D, Department of Private and Commercial Law, Faculty of Law, Bo wen
University, Iwo, Nigeria.
83
liberty disrupted by the behaviour which exceeds acceptable
specified limits.
2
Punishment is the process whereby a person who commits moral
wrong is sanctioned in accordance with the provisions of the law
recognising the wrong doing and specifying the penalty it attracts.
3
Because crime affects both the victim and the society, punishment
seeks to protect the victim‘s interest as well as the social well-being.
The objectives of punishment include Deterrence, Retribution,
Restoration, Rehabilitation, Reformation and Incapacitation. The
importance of deterrence in crime prevention cannot be over
emphasized. Scholars have contemplated the possibility of
deterrence being considered as the foremost objective of criminal
justice system as opposed to retribution.
4
Whether the ‗special
deterrence‘ which prevents the offender from committing other
crimes in future or ‗general deterrence‘ which punish the offender
as a scapegoat to discourage other members of the society from
partaking in crime.
5
Although it is impossible to completely prevent
commission of crime in any society because crime is a natural
societal occurrence as such not every member of the society is
capable of being deterred. However, punishment reminds the
people that there are consequences for committing crime as such the
vast majority of the people can be deterred from partaking in crime.
However, the various objectives of criminal justice can only be
2
Thomas Hobbes, On The Citizen, Richard Tuck & Michael Silverthome
(eds.) (Cambridge University Press 1998) (1642) 26-31
3
Garland. D, Punishment and Modern Society (Oxford, England: Oxford
University Press 1990)17
4
Gerald V. Bradley, Retribution: “The Central Aim of Punishment‖ (2 003) 1
(27) Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy 19-21
5
Andenaes J, ‗General Prevention Revisited‘ (1975) 66 Journal of Criminal
Law and Criminology 338

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT