Back to the future in South African security: from intentions to effective mechanisms

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Date15 August 2019
Citation2007 Acta Juridica 156
AuthorClifford Shearing
Published date15 August 2019
Pages156-170
Back to the future in South African
security: from intentions to effective
mechanisms
CLIFFORD SHEARING AND DON FOSTER*
University of Cape Town
I INTRODUCTION
Recently the South African Minister of Safety and Security, Charles
Nqakula, argued that local and municipal police should be thought of as
‘co-owned’ by communities.
1
To enable the realisation of this vision
Nqakula was reported to be considering ‘changes to the Police Services
Act and the laws governing municipal policing’.
2
In this report the
Minister is quoted as saying that ‘no police force, no matter how big it is,
can ever effectively deal with crime’ alone.
3
In the Sunday Times, also of 6
May 2007, the Minister is reported as arguing for the importance of
forging a closer relationship between the police and the private security
industry. The article states:
‘The government is considering a ground-breaking plan to rope in the
country’s 300,000-strong army of private security guards to help police f‌ight
crime.’
4
This theme of utilising and integrating varying sets of resources in
policing has become a familiar theme of the Minister. It has also become a
familiar, indeed a dominant, theme internationally where the key
challenge to policing is identif‌ied as the integration of multiple sets of
resources that include but are not limited to police resources.
5
In the newspaper reports just cited
6
the strategic approach the Minister
has proposed was characterised as ‘a radical plan to over-haul policing
* Clifford Shearing Ph D (Toronto), Professor of Criminology,University of Cape Town;
Don Foster Ph D (Cantab), Professor of Psychology, University of Cape Town. The assistance
of Nadia Ebrahim is gratefully acknowledged. This work is based upon research supported by
the South African Research Chair’s Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology
(DST) and National Research Foundation (NRF). Any opinions, f‌indings and conclusions or
recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and therefore the NRF
and DST do not accept any liability with regard thereto.
1
The Sunday Tribune 6 May 2007 at 1.
2
Ibid.
3
Ibid.
4
Sunday Times 6 May 2007 at 1.
5
Law Commission of Canada In Search of Security: The Future of Policing in Canada (2006).
6
Sunday Tribune (n 1); Sunday Times(n 4).
156
2007 Acta Juridica 156
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT