Analyses: Remedies for Misrepresentation Inducing a Long-Term Insurance Contract: The Didcott Principle
Jurisdiction | South Africa |
Pages | 387-395 |
Author | MFB Reinecke |
Date | 25 May 2019 |
Published date | 25 May 2019 |
Analyses
Remedies for Misrepresentation Inducing a
Long-Term Insurance Contract:
The Didcott Principle*
MFB REINECKE
Emeritus Professor of Private Law, University of Johannesburg
Assistant Ombudsman for Long-Term Insurance, Cape Town
1 Introduction
In 1991 Didcott J (as he then was) recommended that the existing insurance
legislation should be amended to provide that an insurer could cancel a policy
on the grounds of misrepresentation or breach of warranty only if it would not
have entered into the contract had it not been misled by the insured (see Pillay
v South African Life Assurance Co Ltd 1991 (1) SA 363 (D)). He suggested
that if the insurer would have contracted on different terms if it had not been
misled, alternative remedies should be made available to the insurer. This is
what is meant by the Didcott principle.
This recommendation involves one of the most important issues facing the
law of insurance today. It applies to both long-term and short-term insurance
but will only be considered in the context of long-term insurance here.
2 Misrepresentation: Wrongful Conduct
We find ourselves in the area of misrepresentation and the remedies for it.
Misrepresentation is a wrongful act or delict. Misrepresentation may be by
way of an omission or positive conduct, but it would appear that insurers and
underwriters by and large are of the view that non-disclosure covers the whole
field of misrepresentation! Non-disclosure entails a failure to speak where
there is a duty to speak, while a misrepresentation by positive conduct occurs
if a person creates by his conduct a wrong impression relating to a past or
present fact, for instance, a wrong answer to a question in the proposal for
insurance. It may be appropriate if not customary to refer to a positive
misrepresentation as a mis-disclosure.
For present purposes, it is important to keep in mind that a misrepresenta-
* This is the revised version of a talk delivered to the Society of Insurance Medical Underwriters
(SASIMU) in Johannesburg on 10 September 2008.
387
(2009) 21 SA Merc LJ 387
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
To continue reading
Request your trial