Analyses: Ensuring advantage to everyone in a modern South African insolvency law

JurisdictionSouth Africa
AuthorAnneli Loubser
Date25 May 2019
Citation(1997) 9 SA Merc LJ 325
Published date25 May 2019
Pages325-333
Analyses/Analises
Ensuring Advantage to Everyone in a
Modern South African Insolvency Law
ANNELI LOUBSER
University of South Africa
1 Introduction
There can be no doubt that insolvency law has come a long way since
Roman times when unpaid creditors were sometimes allowed to 'attach'
the person of the debtor who was unable to repay his debts and literally
divide the pieces of his body among themselves. By selling these pieces to
the family of the (now) deceased debtor for proper burial, funds were
generated with which to repay at least part of their claims (see
Mars' The
Law of Insolvency in South Africa
8 ed (1988) by Elmarie de la Rey at 1).
An interesting indication of how far the pendulum has already swung in
the opposite direction, was contained in a newspaper article which
reported that a supporting organisation had been founded by
sequestrated debtors to put an end to what they perceived to be unfair
discrimination ('Gesekwestreerdes snoer hul kragte saam' 17 June 1996
Beeld
at 7). A long list of grievances included the complaints that assets
obtained after sequestration formed part of the insolvent estate and that
after sequestration of their estates, these debtors were not allowed to
open savings accounts or cheque accounts, although, according to their
spokesperson, the average income of the fourteen founding members of
the organisation was
R14
500 per month!
2 International Developments
We have to accept the fact that modern insolvency law is moving
further and further away from the principle of burdening the debtor who
is unable to pay his debts with severe or permanent disabilities, let alone
with punishment. Insolvent debtors are no longer regarded or treated as
criminals who 'craftily obtaining into their hands great substance of other
men's goods, do suddenly flee to parts unknown, or keep their houses,
not minding to pay or restore to . . . their creditors their duties, but [using
the money] for their own pleasure and delicate living', as they were
described in the preamble to the first English bankruptcy statute passed in
1542. This was a criminal statute directed at fraudulent debtors, and
eventually led to a provision in an Act of 1705 that such debtors could be
sentenced to death (Andrew J Duncan 'From Dismemberment to
325
(1997) 9 SA Merc LJ 325
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT