An Evaluation of the Limitation of the Right to Strike in Terms of the Law of General Application in South Africa
Jurisdiction | South Africa |
Author | Mlungisi Tenza |
Pages | 471-492 |
Date | 27 May 2019 |
Published date | 27 May 2019 |
Citation | (2018) 29 Stell LR 471 |
471
AN EVALUATION OF THE LIMITATION OF THE
RIGHT TO STRIKE IN TERMS OF THE LAW OF
GENERAL APPLICATION IN SOUTH AFRICA
Mlungisi Tenza
LLB LLM LLD
Lecturer, University of KwaZulu-Natal
1 Introduction
The Constitution of the Republic of South Af rica, 1996 (“Constitution”)
includes a Bill of Rights providing for fu ndamental rights.1 The Bill of Rights
contains both individual and group rights. T hese rights are, however, not
absolute, and may be limited in terms of section 36 of the Constitut ion. The
reasons advanced for the li mitation of different rights in the Constit ution may
differ depending on t he circumstances and context in which the right(s) is/
are exercised. Among the rig hts entrenched in the Constitution, is the r ight of
workers to s trike.2 However, exercising the right to strike a nd other associated
rights must not infringe the rights of others. It has, however, become a norm
in South Africa that when workers exercise their right to strike or engage in
conduct in contemplation or in fu rtherance of a strike, a mea sure of disruption
or damage to property often takes place.3 The con sequence is that the right
of people to live in an environment that is free from violence is affected in
one way or another.4 The question that arises is how the right to strike can
be limited if exercising it affect s other people or their rights negatively. The
Labour Relations Act 66 of 1996 (“LRA”) makes provision for the limitation
of the right to strike in section 65(1). However, these limitations seem to be
inadequate as the exercise of the right to strike often becomes violent. The
article therefore proposes f urther lim itations in terms of section 36 of the
Constitution.
The article investigates how the limitation clause in the Const itution can
be used to limit the r ight to strike if par ticipants cause dam age to property
or harm other people. It is argued that the right to str ike is not absolute, and
like most rights in the Bill of Rights, can be limited if t he limitation passes
constitutional muste r in terms of section 36.5
1 Ch 2 of the Constit ution of South Afr ica, 1996.
2 S 23(2) (c).
3 Food and Allied Worker s Union obo Kapesi v Premier Food s Limited t/a Blue Ribbon Salt Riv er 2012
33 ILJ 1779 (LAC); Natio nal Union of Mineworker s v Goldfields Secu rity Ltd 1999 ILJ 1553 (LC); and
Mondi Ltd (Mond i Kraft Divisio n v Chemical Energ y Paper Print ing Wood & Allied Workers Unio n) 2005
26 ILJ 1458 (LC).
4 S 12(1)(c) of the Constitution.
5 S 36.
(2018) 29 Stell LR 471
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
2 The constitutional right to strike
The right to strike is entrenched in section 23 of the Constitution.6 This
right, together with other r ights guara nteed in the Bill of Rights, need s to be
properly understood as par t of the Constitution as a whole and as a signicant
element of the Constitution’s aim to transform the South A frican society.7
The Constitution proclai ms itself as the supreme law of the Republic and any
law or conduct contrary t o its provisions or ambitions of creating a stable and
democratic society based on human dignity, equalit y and freedom, should be
declare d invalid.8 It fur ther proclaims, in the Preamble, that it ai ms to heal the
divisions of the past and to create a so ciety based on democratic values, social
justice, and fund amental human rights.9
The Constitution ma kes the right to stri ke available to a “worker” in the
sing ul ar.10 It fur ther provides that national legislation may be enacted to give
effect to the rights in the Bill of Rights.11 As a result, the LRA was enacted.
The LRA denes a st rike as:
“[T]he partial or complete concerted refusal to work, or the retardation of work, by persons who are
or have been employed by the same employer or by different employers, for the purpose of remedying
a grievance or resolving a dispute in respect of any matter of mutual interest between employer
and employee, and every reference to ‘work’ in this denition includes overtime work, whether it is
voluntary or compulsory.”12
According to the denition in the LRA, a strike is constitut ed by a group of
people with a common goal of resolving a labour d ispute between them and
an employer or employer’s organisation.13 This means that the right to strike
cannot be exercised by a single employee acting alone and such strike must
have a particular goal or pur pose. It is also not a requirement in terms of the
LRA that participants in a strike must be af liated to a tra de union or that a
trade union mus t call the strike. It seems sufcient that the re must be a group
of employees having a dispute with their employer that concer ns common
grievances or demand s.
2 1 Protected and unprotected strikes
The LRA fu rther provides protection to a str ike or conduct in contemplation
or in furt herance of a strike if t here is compliance with sections 6 4(1) and
65(1). These two sections, resp ectively, make provision for the procedure that
must be followed prior to convening a strike a nd the statutory prohibitions on
striki ng under certai n circumstances. Section 64(1) provides that the matter
giving rise to a dispute must be referred to the relevant bargai ning council
or Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (“CCMA”) for
6 S 23(2) (c).
7 I Currie & J de Waa l The Bill of Rights Handbo ok 6 ed (2013) 1.
8 S 1 of the Constit ution.
9 See Preamble to t he Constitution .
10 S 23(2 )(c).
11 S 23(6 ).
12 S 213 of the LRA.
13 Ceramic Indu stries Ltd t/a Bet ta Sanitary ware v National Co nstructio n Building & Allied Worker s Union
1996 17 ILJ 1094 (LC).
472 STELL LR 2018 6
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
To continue reading
Request your trial