AB Ventures Ltd v Siemens Ltd
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Judgment Date | 31 March 2011 |
| Citation | 2011 (4) SA 614 (SCA) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
18 practice notes
-
Country Cloud Trading CC v MEC, Department of Infrastructure Development
...on the issue of impingement on existing contractualrelations.)AnnotationsCase lawSouthern AfricaAB Ventures Ltd v Siemens Ltd 2011 (4) SA 614 (SCA) ([2011] ZASCA 58):comparedAdministrateur, Natal v Trust Bank van Afrika Bpk 1979 (3) SA 824 (A):dictum at 833A–B appliedAetiology Today CC t/a ......
-
Delict
...31) 59 footnote 152 for a discussion on Nugent JA’s reformulation of his dictum in Van Duivenboven in AB Ventures Ltd v Siemens Ltd 2011 (4) SA 614 (SCA) para 10, by replacing the words ‘arbitrary factors’ with ‘a mere intuitive reaction to the facts’ and, generally, the courts’ interchange......
-
Itzikowitz v Absa Bank Ltd
...v ABSA BANK2016 (4) SA 432 SCACDEFGHIJ© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd AnnotationsCase lawSouthern AfricaAB Ventures Ltd v Siemens Ltd 2011 (4) SA 614 (SCA) ([2011] ZASCA 58):dictum in para [5] appliedAmerican Natural Soda Corporation and Another v Competition Commissionand Others 2003 (5) SA 6......
-
Hlumisa Investment Holdings Rf Ltd and Another v Kirkinis and Others
...by Deloitte to shareholders was untenable (see [73]). 2020 (5) SA p421 Cases cited Southern Africa AB Ventures Ltd v Siemens Ltd 2011 (4) SA 614 (SCA) ([2011] ZASCA 58): dictum in para [5] Attorney-General, Transvaal v Botha 1994 (1) SA 306 (A): dictum at 330I – J applied Axiam Holdings Ltd......
Get Started for Free
17 cases
-
Country Cloud Trading CC v MEC, Department of Infrastructure Development
...on the issue of impingement on existing contractualrelations.)AnnotationsCase lawSouthern AfricaAB Ventures Ltd v Siemens Ltd 2011 (4) SA 614 (SCA) ([2011] ZASCA 58):comparedAdministrateur, Natal v Trust Bank van Afrika Bpk 1979 (3) SA 824 (A):dictum at 833A–B appliedAetiology Today CC t/a ......
-
Itzikowitz v Absa Bank Ltd
...v ABSA BANK2016 (4) SA 432 SCACDEFGHIJ© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd AnnotationsCase lawSouthern AfricaAB Ventures Ltd v Siemens Ltd 2011 (4) SA 614 (SCA) ([2011] ZASCA 58):dictum in para [5] appliedAmerican Natural Soda Corporation and Another v Competition Commissionand Others 2003 (5) SA 6......
-
Hlumisa Investment Holdings Rf Ltd and Another v Kirkinis and Others
...by Deloitte to shareholders was untenable (see [73]). 2020 (5) SA p421 Cases cited Southern Africa AB Ventures Ltd v Siemens Ltd 2011 (4) SA 614 (SCA) ([2011] ZASCA 58): dictum in para [5] Attorney-General, Transvaal v Botha 1994 (1) SA 306 (A): dictum at 330I – J applied Axiam Holdings Ltd......
-
Hlumisa Investment Holdings (RF) Ltd v Kirkinis
...matrix, which by contrast is essential for deciding negligence and causation'. In AB Ventures Ltd v Siemens Ltd [2011] ZASCA 58; 2011 (4) SA 614 (SCA) para 5, Nugent JA noted that in a case such as this, the issue of wrongfulness is 'quintessentially a matter that is capable of being decide......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Delict
...31) 59 footnote 152 for a discussion on Nugent JA’s reformulation of his dictum in Van Duivenboven in AB Ventures Ltd v Siemens Ltd 2011 (4) SA 614 (SCA) para 10, by replacing the words ‘arbitrary factors’ with ‘a mere intuitive reaction to the facts’ and, generally, the courts’ interchange......