Van der Merwe NO and Others v Hydraberg Hydraulics CC and Others; Van der Merwe NO and Others v Bosman and Others
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Citation | 2010 (5) SA 555 (WCC) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
11 practice notes
-
Curbing the abuse of the trust form: The inclusion of penalty and prohibition provisions as well as compulsory audits in the Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1988
...Some Comparative Perspectives” (2012) Rabel J 1095. See also ch 7 in Du Toit et al Trust Law; ch 6 in Cameron et al Law of Trusts.9 2010 5 SA 555 (WCC) 568E-571H. See Ex Parte Gore 2013 3 SA 382 (WCC) for the court’s explanation of the term “unconscionable abuse” in s 20(9) of the Companies......
-
A Comparative Perspective on the “Joint Action Rule” in the context of Business Trusts
...on a chapter in I d u Plessis’s LLD dissertation1 For reported c ases, see for exa mple Van der Merwe NO v Hyd raberg Hydrau lics CC 2010 5 SA 555 (WCC); Steyn v Bloc kpave (Pty) Ltd 2011 3 SA 528 (FB); Pasco al v Wurdeman 2012 3 SA 422 (GSJ); O’Shea NO v Van Zyl 2012 1 SA 9 0 (SCA) para 23......
-
In Joint Matrimony We Share: Controlling the Powers to Use the Trust to Limit Matrimonial Property Rights in South African Law
...(2014) Juta’s Quarterly Review of South African Law (3)(b) 2.1.6 Jordaan v Jordaan 2001 (3) SA 288 (C); Van der Merwe v Van der Merwe 2010 (5) SA 555 (SCA) and WT v KT 2015 (3) SA 574 (SCA).7 Badenhorst v Badenhorst 2006 (2) All SA 363 (SCA). © Juta and Company (Pty) https://doi.org/10.4734......
-
In Joint Matrimony We Share: Controlling the Powers to Use the Trust to Limit Matrimonial Property Rights in South African Law
...(2014) Juta’s Quarterly Review of South African Law (3)(b) 2.1.6 Jordaan v Jordaan 2001 (3) SA 288 (C); Van der Merwe v Van der Merwe 2010 (5) SA 555 (SCA) and WT v KT 2015 (3) SA 574 (SCA).7 Badenhorst v Badenhorst 2006 (2) All SA 363 (SCA). © Juta and Company (Pty) https://doi.org/10.4734......
Request a trial to view additional results
5 cases
-
Van Zyl and Another NNO v Kaye NO and Others
...(A): referred to A Van der Merwe NO and Others v Hydraberg Hydraulics CC and Others; Van der Merwe NO and Others v Bosman and Others 2010 (5) SA 555 (WCC): referred Von Wielligh Bester NO and Others v Merchant Commercial Finance and Others B [2014] ZAWCHC 16: followed Warricker and Another ......
-
Shepstone & Wylie Attorneys v De Witt NO
...'As held in Van der Merwe NO and Others v Hydraberg Hydraulics CC and others; Van der Merwe NO and others v Bosman and others 2010 (5) SA 555 (WCC) at para 16 that in order to qualify as a meeting all trustees in the office would have to receive notice thereof so as to be able to participat......
-
Le Grange v Le Grange
...para 11, 15, 16, 17. [3] Parker para 15. [4] Parker para 16. [5] Van der Merwe NO and others v Hydraberg Hydraulic CC and others 2010 (5) SA 555 (WCC); Hoosen and others NNO v Deedat and others 1999 (4) SA 425 (SCA) at para 23, 24, 26; Steyn NO and others v Blockpave (Pty) Ltd [2010] ZAFSHC......
-
Shepstone & Wylie Attorneys v De Witt NO
...'As held in Van der Merwe NO and Others v Hydraberg Hydraulics CC and others; Van der Merwe NO and others v Bosman and others 2010 (5) SA 555 (WCC) at para 16 that in order to qualify as a meeting all trustees in the office would have to receive notice thereof so as to be able to participat......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
-
Curbing the abuse of the trust form: The inclusion of penalty and prohibition provisions as well as compulsory audits in the Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1988
...Some Comparative Perspectives” (2012) Rabel J 1095. See also ch 7 in Du Toit et al Trust Law; ch 6 in Cameron et al Law of Trusts.9 2010 5 SA 555 (WCC) 568E-571H. See Ex Parte Gore 2013 3 SA 382 (WCC) for the court’s explanation of the term “unconscionable abuse” in s 20(9) of the Companies......
-
A Comparative Perspective on the “Joint Action Rule” in the context of Business Trusts
...on a chapter in I d u Plessis’s LLD dissertation1 For reported c ases, see for exa mple Van der Merwe NO v Hyd raberg Hydrau lics CC 2010 5 SA 555 (WCC); Steyn v Bloc kpave (Pty) Ltd 2011 3 SA 528 (FB); Pasco al v Wurdeman 2012 3 SA 422 (GSJ); O’Shea NO v Van Zyl 2012 1 SA 9 0 (SCA) para 23......
-
In Joint Matrimony We Share: Controlling the Powers to Use the Trust to Limit Matrimonial Property Rights in South African Law
...(2014) Juta’s Quarterly Review of South African Law (3)(b) 2.1.6 Jordaan v Jordaan 2001 (3) SA 288 (C); Van der Merwe v Van der Merwe 2010 (5) SA 555 (SCA) and WT v KT 2015 (3) SA 574 (SCA).7 Badenhorst v Badenhorst 2006 (2) All SA 363 (SCA). © Juta and Company (Pty) https://doi.org/10.4734......
-
In Joint Matrimony We Share: Controlling the Powers to Use the Trust to Limit Matrimonial Property Rights in South African Law
...(2014) Juta’s Quarterly Review of South African Law (3)(b) 2.1.6 Jordaan v Jordaan 2001 (3) SA 288 (C); Van der Merwe v Van der Merwe 2010 (5) SA 555 (SCA) and WT v KT 2015 (3) SA 574 (SCA).7 Badenhorst v Badenhorst 2006 (2) All SA 363 (SCA). © Juta and Company (Pty) https://doi.org/10.4734......
Request a trial to view additional results