Stride v Castelein
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Citation | 2000 (3) SA 662 (W) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
2 practice notes
-
Retief v Arnu Du Preez h/a Ardu Transport
...the respondent's employees and SARS constituted a gross infraction of the audi alteram partem rule. Marais J in Stride v Castelein 2000 (3) SA 662 (W) at 667I-668A "The granting of a provisional sequestration order has the most drastic consequences. It involves a change in status; it divest......
-
Lak Investment Company NO 26 (Pty) Ltd v Pressure Advance Technology CC
...its employees and the trade union are informed of the winding-up proceedings. 2014 JDR 0315 p9 Pretorius J [25] In Stride v Castelein 2000 (3) SA 662 (W) Marais J found at 667 "The granting of a provisional sequestration order has the most drastic consequences. It involves a change in statu......
2 cases
-
Retief v Arnu Du Preez h/a Ardu Transport
...the respondent's employees and SARS constituted a gross infraction of the audi alteram partem rule. Marais J in Stride v Castelein 2000 (3) SA 662 (W) at 667I-668A "The granting of a provisional sequestration order has the most drastic consequences. It involves a change in status; it divest......
-
Lak Investment Company NO 26 (Pty) Ltd v Pressure Advance Technology CC
...its employees and the trade union are informed of the winding-up proceedings. 2014 JDR 0315 p9 Pretorius J [25] In Stride v Castelein 2000 (3) SA 662 (W) Marais J found at 667 "The granting of a provisional sequestration order has the most drastic consequences. It involves a change in statu......