S v Sibiya

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Judgment Date13 February 2004
Citation2004 (2) SACR 82 (W)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
9 practice notes
  • 2007 index
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...420S v Shaik 2007 (1) SACR 318 (SCA) ..................................................... 419-420S v Sibiya 2004 (2) SACR 82 (W) .......................................................... 408-409S v Sikhipha 2006 (2) SACR 439 (SCA)........................................ 13-114; 119S v Sin......
  • 2005 index
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...291–292S v Sibeko 1995 (1) SACR 186 (W) .......................................................... 386–387S v Sibiya 2004 (2) SACR 82 (W) ................................................ 213–218; 224–227S v Simanga 1998 (1) SACR (Ck) ...............................................................
  • S v Ndlovu; S v Sibisi
    • South Africa
    • 18 February 2005
    ...(2) SACR 217 (T): referred to S v Rudman and Another; S v Mthwana 1992 (1) SACR 70 (A) (1992 (1) SA 343): referred to B S v Sibiya 2004 (2) SACR 82 (W): not S v Tshidiso 2002 (1) SACR 207 (W): compared S v Visser 2001 (1) SACR 401 (C): referred to. Unreported Cases S v Magagula (WLD case No......
  • Case Review: Criminal Procedure
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 19 August 2019
    ...that they face the possibility of a minimum sentence being imposed. (See, for example, S v Ndlovu 2004 (2) SACR 70 (W) and S v Sibiya 2004 (2) SACR 82 (W)).However, what is at issue in this regard is the question of precisely when the accused should be informed. Thus in Ndlovu’s case the ac......
  • Get Started for Free
6 cases
  • S v Ndlovu; S v Sibisi
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Criminal Law Reports
    • 18 February 2005
    ...(2) SACR 217 (T): referred to S v Rudman and Another; S v Mthwana 1992 (1) SACR 70 (A) (1992 (1) SA 343): referred to B S v Sibiya 2004 (2) SACR 82 (W): not S v Tshidiso 2002 (1) SACR 207 (W): compared S v Visser 2001 (1) SACR 401 (C): referred to. Unreported Cases S v Magagula (WLD case No......
  • S v Ndlovu; S v Sibisi
    • South Africa
    • Witwatersrand Local Division
    • 18 February 2005
    ...case (supra) has been followed in S v Magagula (WLD case No A162/02, unreported), S v Ndlovu 2004 (2) SACR 70 (W) and S v Sibiya 2004 (2) SACR 82 (W). E In evaluating the overall position, the series of rape cases starting with Mbambo (supra) require careful consideration. These decisions a......
  • S v Komane
    • South Africa
    • Transvaal Provincial Division
    • 7 November 2005
    ...in that regard (S v Manale [2000] 4 All SA 463 (NC); S v Nkonde 2001 (1) SACR 538 (W). S v Matladi 2002 (2) SACR 447 (T); S v Sibiya 2004 (2) SACR 82 (W); that did not happen in this case. Consequently, there is no indication as to precisely how Mr Komane was advised of his right to legal. ......
  • S v Mabuza and Others
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Criminal Law Reports
    • 20 September 2007
    ...Nkomo 2007 (2) SACR 198 (SCA): dictum in para [3] applied S v Radebe; S v Mbonani 1988 (1) SA 191 (T): approved and applied S v Sibiya 2004 (2) SACR 82 (W): not approved B S v Sikhipha 2006 (2) SACR 439 (SCA): dictum in para [10] S v Williams and Others 1995 (2) SACR 251 (CC) (1995 (3) SA 6......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • 2007 index
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...420S v Shaik 2007 (1) SACR 318 (SCA) ..................................................... 419-420S v Sibiya 2004 (2) SACR 82 (W) .......................................................... 408-409S v Sikhipha 2006 (2) SACR 439 (SCA)........................................ 13-114; 119S v Sin......
  • 2005 index
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...291–292S v Sibeko 1995 (1) SACR 186 (W) .......................................................... 386–387S v Sibiya 2004 (2) SACR 82 (W) ................................................ 213–218; 224–227S v Simanga 1998 (1) SACR (Ck) ...............................................................
  • Case Review: Criminal Procedure
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 19 August 2019
    ...that they face the possibility of a minimum sentence being imposed. (See, for example, S v Ndlovu 2004 (2) SACR 70 (W) and S v Sibiya 2004 (2) SACR 82 (W)).However, what is at issue in this regard is the question of precisely when the accused should be informed. Thus in Ndlovu’s case the ac......