S v Radebe

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeCorbett JA, Van Heerden JA, Smalberger JA, Boshoff AJA and Steyn AJA
Judgment Date01 December 1987
Citation1988 (1) SA 772 (A)
Hearing Date24 November 1987
CourtAppellate Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 practice notes
  • Dilokong Chrome Mines (Edms) Bpk v Direkteur-Generaal, Departement van Handel en Nywerheid
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...prof Beukes oor die bedoeling van die Vaste Komitee by die bewoording van die uitvoeraansporingskema toelaatbaar was, sien S v Radebe 1988 (1) SA 772 (A) op 778C-F; Westinghouse Brake & Equipment (Pty) Ltd v Bilger Engineering (Pty) Ltd 1986 (2) SA 555 (A) op 562. Ten aansien van 'n betoog ......
  • Minister of Law and Order and Others v Pavlicevic
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Front v Theron NO 1984 (1) SA 315 (C) at 317G - H, 323G - H, 326D - F; S v Ramgobin and Others 1986 (1) SA 68 (N) at 96F; S v Radebe 1988 (1) SA 772 (A) at 775G, 776H - I, 777I - J; S v ffrench-Beytagh 1972 (3) SA 430 (A) at 457E - H; Ackermann Die Reg insake Openbare Orde en Staatsveilighe......
  • S v Nel
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Openbare Orde en Staatsveiligheid at 34, 43; Mathews Freedom, State Security and the Rule C of Law at 42, 43, 221 - 2, 224; S v Radebe 1988 (1) SA 772 (A); Mathews 'The Newspeak Version of Sabotage' (1988) 1 SAS 175; Joubert (ed) Law of South Africa vol 6 para 428 at 458 - 60; S v Sinkankan......
  • Nkayi and Another v Head of the Security Branch of the SA Police, Pretoria, and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...to the two suggested meanings and may justifiably be regarded as ambiguous. But in any event, as was pointed out in S v Radebe 1988 (1) SA 772 (A) I at 778F-G: '(W)ords which prima facie are clear and unambiguous may require to be read in the light of their context, ie in the light of the s......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
  • Dilokong Chrome Mines (Edms) Bpk v Direkteur-Generaal, Departement van Handel en Nywerheid
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...prof Beukes oor die bedoeling van die Vaste Komitee by die bewoording van die uitvoeraansporingskema toelaatbaar was, sien S v Radebe 1988 (1) SA 772 (A) op 778C-F; Westinghouse Brake & Equipment (Pty) Ltd v Bilger Engineering (Pty) Ltd 1986 (2) SA 555 (A) op 562. Ten aansien van 'n betoog ......
  • Minister of Law and Order and Others v Pavlicevic
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Front v Theron NO 1984 (1) SA 315 (C) at 317G - H, 323G - H, 326D - F; S v Ramgobin and Others 1986 (1) SA 68 (N) at 96F; S v Radebe 1988 (1) SA 772 (A) at 775G, 776H - I, 777I - J; S v ffrench-Beytagh 1972 (3) SA 430 (A) at 457E - H; Ackermann Die Reg insake Openbare Orde en Staatsveilighe......
  • S v Nel
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Openbare Orde en Staatsveiligheid at 34, 43; Mathews Freedom, State Security and the Rule C of Law at 42, 43, 221 - 2, 224; S v Radebe 1988 (1) SA 772 (A); Mathews 'The Newspeak Version of Sabotage' (1988) 1 SAS 175; Joubert (ed) Law of South Africa vol 6 para 428 at 458 - 60; S v Sinkankan......
  • Nkayi and Another v Head of the Security Branch of the SA Police, Pretoria, and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...to the two suggested meanings and may justifiably be regarded as ambiguous. But in any event, as was pointed out in S v Radebe 1988 (1) SA 772 (A) I at 778F-G: '(W)ords which prima facie are clear and unambiguous may require to be read in the light of their context, ie in the light of the s......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT