S v Olivier

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Citation2010 (2) SACR 178 (SCA)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
15 practice notes
  • 2011 index
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , September 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...67-68S v Nzo 1990 (3) SA 1 (A) ..................................................................... 203-209S v Olivier 2010 (2) SACR 178 (SCA) .................................................... 348-351S v Orrie 2005 (1) SACR 63 (C) ..............................................................
  • 2010 index
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...2007 (2) SACR 596 (C) ............................................................... 163 © Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd S v Olivier 2010 (2) SACR 178 (SCA) .............................................. 429-30, 435S v Pastoors 1986 (4) SA 222 (W) ...................................................
  • S v RO and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...to S v Ndlovu 2003 (1) SACR 331 (SCA) ([2003] 1 All SA 66): referred to I S v O 2003 (2) SACR 147 (C): referred to S v Olivier 2010 (2) SACR 178 (SCA): referred to S v R 1993 (1) SACR 209 (A) (1993 (1) SA 476): referred to S v S 1977 (3) SA 830 (A): referred to S v Salzwedel and Others 1999......
  • S v Piater
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...1222; [2001] 3 All SA 220): dicta in para [12] applied S v Matyityi 2011 (1) SACR 40 (SCA): dicta in para [13] applied S v Olivier 2010 (2) SACR 178 (SCA): considered S v Petkar 1988 (3) SA 571 (A): referred to E S v Pillay 1977 (4) SA 531 (A): dicta at 535E – F applied S v Pillay 2011 (2) ......
  • Get Started for Free
10 cases
  • S v RO and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...to S v Ndlovu 2003 (1) SACR 331 (SCA) ([2003] 1 All SA 66): referred to I S v O 2003 (2) SACR 147 (C): referred to S v Olivier 2010 (2) SACR 178 (SCA): referred to S v R 1993 (1) SACR 209 (A) (1993 (1) SA 476): referred to S v S 1977 (3) SA 830 (A): referred to S v Salzwedel and Others 1999......
  • S v Piater
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...1222; [2001] 3 All SA 220): dicta in para [12] applied S v Matyityi 2011 (1) SACR 40 (SCA): dicta in para [13] applied S v Olivier 2010 (2) SACR 178 (SCA): considered S v Petkar 1988 (3) SA 571 (A): referred to E S v Pillay 1977 (4) SA 531 (A): dicta at 535E – F applied S v Pillay 2011 (2) ......
  • S v RO and Another
    • South Africa
    • Supreme Court of Appeal
    • 31 May 2010
    ...to S v Ndlovu 2003 (1) SACR 331 (SCA) ([2003] 1 All SA 66): referred to I S v O 2003 (2) SACR 147 (C): referred to S v Olivier 2010 (2) SACR 178 (SCA): referred to S v R 1993 (1) SACR 209 (A) (1993 (1) SA 476): referred to S v S 1977 (3) SA 830 (A): referred to S v Salzwedel and Others 1999......
  • S v Smith
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...referred to S v Nawaseb 1980 (1) SA 339 (SWA): discussed S v Niemand 2001 (2) SACR 654 (CC) (2002 (1) SA 21): applied B S v Olivier 2010 (2) SACR 178 (SCA): referred S v Pillay 2011 (2) SACR 409 (SCA): referred to S v Samuels 2011 (1) SACR 9 (SCA): referred to S v Shabalala en 'n Ander 1984......
  • Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
  • 2011 index
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , September 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...67-68S v Nzo 1990 (3) SA 1 (A) ..................................................................... 203-209S v Olivier 2010 (2) SACR 178 (SCA) .................................................... 348-351S v Orrie 2005 (1) SACR 63 (C) ..............................................................
  • 2010 index
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...2007 (2) SACR 596 (C) ............................................................... 163 © Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd S v Olivier 2010 (2) SACR 178 (SCA) .............................................. 429-30, 435S v Pastoors 1986 (4) SA 222 (W) ...................................................
  • Recent Case: Sentencing
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , October 2022
    • 3 October 2022
    ...court to ‘receive such evidence as it thinks t, in order to inform itsel f as to the proper sentence to be passed’. In S v Olivier 2010 (2) SACR 178 (SCA) (at para [8]), Majiedt AJA highlighted that the underlying ai m of this section is to empower the court wit h ‘as much information as p......
  • S v Matyityi 2011 1 SACR 40 (SCA) : compliance with mandatory sentencing, and placing the victim at the centre of the criminal justice system : recent case law
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet De Jure No. 45-3, January 2012
    • 1 January 2012
    ...legal representative for theaccused, the prosecutor and the presiding officer) (see S v Siebert 19981 SACR 554 (SCA); S v Olivier 2010 2 SACR 178 (SCA); S v Samuels 20111 SACR 9 (SCA); S v Pillay 2011 2 SACR 409 (SCA)), and it is time that theperfunctory approach to sentencing, which is too......
  • Get Started for Free