S v Nkondo

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeJordaan AJ
Judgment Date18 February 2000
Citation2000 (1) SACR 358 (W)
Hearing Date18 February 2000
CounselK Ferreira for the State N Mateane for the accused
CourtWitwatersrand Local Division

Jordaan AJ:

The accused in this matter appeared before the regional court sitting at Orlando. He was convicted of rape and robbery. The matter falls within the ambit of the Criminal Law Amendment Act 105 of 1997. It was therefore sent E to this Court for sentence.

The matter originally came before Masipa J of this Division and she directed the following query to the magistrate:

'1.

It is not clear from the charge sheet or record whether the accused was informed of his rights to legal representation. F

2.

If this was not done, please supply reasons why, bearing in mind that the possible sentence in this matter is life imprisonment.

3.

If the accused was informed of the said rights please explain why this fact does not appear anywhere on the record.'

The presiding regional court magistrate responded in the following terms: G

'1.

Die notule wat aan die agbare Regter voorgelê is, is onvolledig omdat die agterblad van die J15 nie gefotostateer is nie. Beskuldigdes word almal by hul eerste verskyning ingelig van hulle reg tot regsverteenwoordiging en hierdie feit sal op die agterkant van die oorspronklike J15 aangeteken wees. H

2.

Ek moet egter daarop wys dat hierdie beskuldigde se eerste verskyning reeds in Augustus 1998 was. Regter Goldstein se uitspraak in S v P V Mbambo het eers op 25 Augustus 1999 tot...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
20 practice notes
  • S v Makhandela
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Criminal Law Reports
    • Invalid date
    ...(1) SACR 372 (C): referred to S v Mthwana 1989 (4) SA 361 (N): referred to S v Naidoo 1962 (4) SA 348 (A): referred to S v Nkondo 2000 (1) SACR 358 (W): referred to J 2007 (2) SACR p623 S v Radebe; S v Mbonani 1988 (1) SA 191 (T): referred to A S v Ramalope 1995 (1) SACR 616 (A): referred t......
  • The Right to Legal Representation and Equality before the Law in Criminal Proceedings in Botswana
    • South Africa
    • Juta Stellenbosch Law Review No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...to exercise h is right to legal r epresentat ion It was held that these omiss ions constitut ed irregularitie s See al so S v Nkondo 2000 1 SACR 358 (W); S v Manale 20 00 2 SACR 666 (NC)53 J Sarkin “Re structuring the L egal Profession and Access to Just ice: The Duty of Law Graduate s and ......
  • S v Sibiya
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Criminal Law Reports
    • Invalid date
    ...SACR 372 (C): appliedS v Ndlovu 2001 (1) SACR 204 (W): dictum at 207f–happliedS v Ndlovu 2003 (1) SACR 331 (SCA): appliedS v Nkondo 2000 (1) SACR 358 (W): appliedS v Radebe; S v Mbonani 1988 (1) SA 191 (T): appliedS v Rapoo en Andere 1999 (2) SACR 217 (T): appliedS v Shabangu 1976 (3) SA 55......
  • 2005 index
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...117S v Njikelana 2003 (2) SACR 166 (C) ....................................................... 84–85S v Nkonde 2000 (1) SACR 358 (W) ........................................................ 226S v Nkosi 2002 (1) SACR 135 (W) ........................................................... 112S v......
  • Get Started for Free
16 cases
  • S v Makhandela
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...(1) SACR 372 (C): referred to S v Mthwana 1989 (4) SA 361 (N): referred to S v Naidoo 1962 (4) SA 348 (A): referred to S v Nkondo 2000 (1) SACR 358 (W): referred to J 2007 (2) SACR p623 S v Radebe; S v Mbonani 1988 (1) SA 191 (T): referred to A S v Ramalope 1995 (1) SACR 616 (A): referred t......
  • S v Sibiya
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SACR 372 (C): appliedS v Ndlovu 2001 (1) SACR 204 (W): dictum at 207f–happliedS v Ndlovu 2003 (1) SACR 331 (SCA): appliedS v Nkondo 2000 (1) SACR 358 (W): appliedS v Radebe; S v Mbonani 1988 (1) SA 191 (T): appliedS v Rapoo en Andere 1999 (2) SACR 217 (T): appliedS v Shabangu 1976 (3) SA 55......
  • S v Tilo
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...(W): referred to S v Mmatli 1988 (2) SA 533 (T): referred to S v Ndlovu 1987 (3) SA 827 (N): dictum at 828E - I applied S v Nkondo 2000 (1) SACR 358 (W): referred S v Rousseau 1979 (3) SA 895 (T): referred to S v Sejake 1981 (1) SA 1215 (O): referred to Shabalala and Others v Attorney-Gener......
  • S v Makhandela
    • South Africa
    • Witwatersrand Local Division
    • 30 July 2004
    ...requirement of a fair trial. See, for instance, Mgcina's case (supra) at 735c-e; S v Moos 1998 (1) SACR 372 (C) at 383a-f; S v Nkondo 2000 (1) SACR 358 (W) at 360d-g (where a retrial was ordered); S v Mkhondo 2001 (1) SACR 49 (W) at 56e-i and In the light of all these considerations it must......
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • The Right to Legal Representation and Equality before the Law in Criminal Proceedings in Botswana
    • South Africa
    • Juta Stellenbosch Law Review No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...to exercise h is right to legal r epresentat ion It was held that these omiss ions constitut ed irregularitie s See al so S v Nkondo 2000 1 SACR 358 (W); S v Manale 20 00 2 SACR 666 (NC)53 J Sarkin “Re structuring the L egal Profession and Access to Just ice: The Duty of Law Graduate s and ......
  • 2005 index
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...117S v Njikelana 2003 (2) SACR 166 (C) ....................................................... 84–85S v Nkonde 2000 (1) SACR 358 (W) ........................................................ 226S v Nkosi 2002 (1) SACR 135 (W) ........................................................... 112S v......
  • Case Review: Criminal Procedure
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , August 2019
    • 19 August 2019
    ...are entitled to legal representation at state expense © Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd 226SACJ • (2005) 2is insuff‌i cient. In S v Nkonde 2000 (1) SACR 358 (W) the court went further: ‘when courts explain the right to legal representation to accused persons and an accused person facing a seriou......
  • Recent Case: Criminal Procedure
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 24 May 2019
    ...(2001) 14 • SAS they must also be encouraged to seek legal representation. Furthermore, in accordance with the decision in S v Nkondo 2000 (1) SACR 358 (W), should an accused nonetheless elect to appear in person (even after the gravity of the case has been explained) then the court must as......