S v Nkomo and Another

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Judgevan Blerk JA, Ogilvie Thompson JA and van Winsen AJA
Judgment Date08 December 1964
Citation1966 (1) SA 831 (A)
Hearing Date20 November 1964
CourtAppellate Division

H van Blerk, J.A.:

The two appellants Alfred Nkomo and Alfred Mkize, both Bantu males referred to as accused No. 1 and accused No. 2 respectively, were convicted in the Durban and Coast Local Division of the murder of Mrs. Skordis, a European woman, on Thursday, 9th January, 1964, in the dwelling house situate at 279 High Ridge Road, Ellis Park, Durban, in which she, her husband and her son, a university student, lived. Both appellants were sentenced to death, with leave to appeal granted by the trial Court.

van Blerk JA

[The learned Judge then set out the evidence and proceeded.]

Accused No. 1 did not give evidence in his defence, but the contents of A the statement before the magistrate, which in the circumstances could not be used against accused No. 2, were not disputed.

Accused No. 2 on being arraigned pleaded not guilty. He gave evidence which is a complete denial of all the relevant evidence proffered against him. He was, however, disbelieved. His denial of possession of the stolen articles and of any knowledge thereof was rejected as false. He was also disbelieved as to the source from which he said he obtained B the R10 notes.

The State case against him depends entirely upon circumstantial evidence. The problem with which the trial Court was faced is whether his complicity in the murder could be inferred from the following proved C facts: On Thursday night, 9th January, the events in (a), (b) and (c) took place.

(a)

The deceased's dwelling house in Durban was broken into while she was alone in the house; she was in her bedroom.

(b)

She was murdered by strangulation which was both manual and by ligature - was effected in such a manner as to evidence an D intention to kill on the part of the person or persons who effected it.

(c)

The transistor radio, exh. 1, and the clothing, exhs. 4, 5 and 9, were stolen out of the bedroom at the time of the murder as well as R800 notes...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 practice notes
  • S v Ramba
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...(1) SA 307 (A); S v Malinga 1963 (1) SA 692 (A); S v Babada 1964 (1) SA 26 (A); S v Harris 1965 (2) SA 340 (A); S v Nkomo and Another 1966 (1) SA 831 (A); S v Manyathi 1967 (1) SA 435 (A); S v Artman and Another 1968 (3) SA 339 (A); S v Petrus 1969 (4) SA 85 (A); S I v Ndlovu 1970 (1) SA 43......
  • Venter v Bophuthatswana Transport Holdings (Edms) Bpk
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...strengthens the inference contended for by the respondent. Compare S v Holshausen 1984 (4) SA 852 (A) at 861F–H; S v Nkomo and Another 1966 (1) SA 831 (A) at 833D–E; Slagment (Pty) Ltd v Building Construction and Allied Workers' Union and Others 1995 (1) SA 742 (A) at 753E–G. The appellant ......
  • S v Holshausen
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SA 457; R v Roets and Another 1954 (3) SA 512; S v Sauls and Others 1981 (3) SA 172; S v Gouws 1967 (4) SA 527; S v Nkomo and Another 1966 (1) SA 831; S v Rabie 1975 (4) SA 588; S v Ramanaka 1949 (1) SA 417; S v I 1984 (4) SA p853 Anderson 1964 (3) SA 494; S v Bengesa 1979 (4) SA 448; S v A......
  • S v Mazibuko and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Distillers Korporasie (SA) Bpk v Kotze 1956 (1) SA 357 (A); S v Cele I 1965 (1) SA 82 (A) ; R v Mlambo 1957 (4) SA 727 (A); S v Nkomo 1966 (1) SA 831 (A); S v Rama 1966 (2) SA 395 (A); S v Mbatha en Andere 1987 (2) SA 272 (A). Semenyane in reply. Potgieter in reply. Robinson in reply. Cur a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
15 cases
  • S v Ramba
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...(1) SA 307 (A); S v Malinga 1963 (1) SA 692 (A); S v Babada 1964 (1) SA 26 (A); S v Harris 1965 (2) SA 340 (A); S v Nkomo and Another 1966 (1) SA 831 (A); S v Manyathi 1967 (1) SA 435 (A); S v Artman and Another 1968 (3) SA 339 (A); S v Petrus 1969 (4) SA 85 (A); S I v Ndlovu 1970 (1) SA 43......
  • Venter v Bophuthatswana Transport Holdings (Edms) Bpk
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...strengthens the inference contended for by the respondent. Compare S v Holshausen 1984 (4) SA 852 (A) at 861F–H; S v Nkomo and Another 1966 (1) SA 831 (A) at 833D–E; Slagment (Pty) Ltd v Building Construction and Allied Workers' Union and Others 1995 (1) SA 742 (A) at 753E–G. The appellant ......
  • S v Holshausen
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SA 457; R v Roets and Another 1954 (3) SA 512; S v Sauls and Others 1981 (3) SA 172; S v Gouws 1967 (4) SA 527; S v Nkomo and Another 1966 (1) SA 831; S v Rabie 1975 (4) SA 588; S v Ramanaka 1949 (1) SA 417; S v I 1984 (4) SA p853 Anderson 1964 (3) SA 494; S v Bengesa 1979 (4) SA 448; S v A......
  • S v Mazibuko and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Distillers Korporasie (SA) Bpk v Kotze 1956 (1) SA 357 (A); S v Cele I 1965 (1) SA 82 (A) ; R v Mlambo 1957 (4) SA 727 (A); S v Nkomo 1966 (1) SA 831 (A); S v Rama 1966 (2) SA 395 (A); S v Mbatha en Andere 1987 (2) SA 272 (A). Semenyane in reply. Potgieter in reply. Robinson in reply. Cur a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT