S v Masita

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Judgment Date15 December 2000
Citation2005 (1) SACR 272 (C)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
4 practice notes
  • S v Kok
    • South Africa
    • Western Cape Division, Cape Town
    • 2 July 2014
    ...of assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm, an offence referred to in the previous sections (s 266). Similarly in G S v Masita 2005 (1) SACR 272 (C) the accused was charged with contravening s 17(1) of the Domestic Violence Act 116 of 1998 and the court found that assault with the in......
  • S v Kok
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Criminal Law Reports
    • 2 July 2014
    ...Act 51 of 1977. Cases cited S v Grobler 1992 (1) SACR 184 (C): applied G S v Malapane [2011] JOL 27840 (GSJ): referred to S v Masita 2005 (1) SACR 272 (C): compared H S v Mavundla 1980 (4) SA 187 (T): S v Mei 1982 (1) SA 299 (O): dicta at 299 discussed S v Mpofu 1985 (4) SA 322 (ZH): referr......
  • S v Ntshonyane and Another
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Criminal Law Reports
    • 21 August 2014
    ...v Mahlangu 2000 (2) SACR 210 (T): referred to S v Makofane and Another (GNP case No A 1099/09, 10 December 2010): compared S v Masita 2005 (1) SACR 272 (C): referred to G S v Mavundla 1980 (4) SA 187 (T): S v Mbatha 1982 (2) SA 145 (N): dicta at 147D – E applied S v Mei 1982 (1) SA 299 (O):......
  • S v Mahlasela
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Criminal Law Reports
    • 1 July 2002
    ...the Act. It was therefore irregular for the magistrate to ask the accused whether he had been found in possession of the article in J 2005 (1) SACR p272 Magid question and it was certainly improper for him to ask the accused whether he had reason to believe that the stereo was A stolen. I h......
4 cases
  • S v Kok
    • South Africa
    • Western Cape Division, Cape Town
    • 2 July 2014
    ...of assault with intent to do grievous bodily harm, an offence referred to in the previous sections (s 266). Similarly in G S v Masita 2005 (1) SACR 272 (C) the accused was charged with contravening s 17(1) of the Domestic Violence Act 116 of 1998 and the court found that assault with the in......
  • S v Kok
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Act 51 of 1977. Cases cited S v Grobler 1992 (1) SACR 184 (C): applied G S v Malapane [2011] JOL 27840 (GSJ): referred to S v Masita 2005 (1) SACR 272 (C): compared H S v Mavundla 1980 (4) SA 187 (T): S v Mei 1982 (1) SA 299 (O): dicta at 299 discussed S v Mpofu 1985 (4) SA 322 (ZH): referr......
  • S v Ntshonyane and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...v Mahlangu 2000 (2) SACR 210 (T): referred to S v Makofane and Another (GNP case No A 1099/09, 10 December 2010): compared S v Masita 2005 (1) SACR 272 (C): referred to G S v Mavundla 1980 (4) SA 187 (T): S v Mbatha 1982 (2) SA 145 (N): dicta at 147D – E applied S v Mei 1982 (1) SA 299 (O):......
  • S v Mahlasela
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...the Act. It was therefore irregular for the magistrate to ask the accused whether he had been found in possession of the article in J 2005 (1) SACR p272 Magid question and it was certainly improper for him to ask the accused whether he had reason to believe that the stereo was A stolen. I h......