S v Maseko

JurisdictionSouth Africa
CourtTransvaal Provincial Division
JudgeHiemstra R en Myburgh R
Judgment Date01 September 1971
Citation1971 (4) SA 475 (T)
Hearing Date01 September 1971

Hiemstra, R.:

Dit is 'n hersieningsuitspraak. Hierdie geval is voorheen opgestuur vir hersiening en is deur een van my H Ampsbroeders bekragtig. Daarna het dit egter geblyk dat die vonnis wat die landdros opgelê het, en wat op hersiening bekragtig is, 'n ongeoorloofde vonnis was.

Hiemstra R

'n Sertifikaat van bekragtiging kan teruggtrek word selfs ook deur 'n ander Regter as die een wat die bekragtiging gedoen het. Daarvoor bestaan gesag in R. v Beitswe, 1960 (3) SA 714 (GW); S. v Makebe, 1967 (1) SA 464 (N); S. v Renhold, 1971 (1) SA 317 (SWA).

A In al hierdie gevalle was die betrokke Regter nie meer in...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
9 practice notes
  • S v Zwane
    • South Africa
    • 8 June 2004
    ...v Coetzee 1950 (1) SA 101 (C): applied A R v Pirison 1959 (1) SA 102 (N): applied S v Madonda 1979 (3) SA 795 (Tk): applied S v Maseko 1971 (4) SA 475 (T): S v Mbayi 1976 (4) SA 638 (Tk): not B followed S v Mboyany en 'n Ander 1978 (2) SA 927 (T): considered S v Mokoena 1975 (4) SA 295 (O):......
  • S v Shange
    • South Africa
    • 26 May 1983
    ...because it ought not to have been granted in the first place. See eg R v Klue 1907 EDC 22; R v Pirison 1959 (1) SA 102 (N); S v Maseko 1971 (4) SA 475 (T); S v Moyo 1978 (4) SA 538 (R). It G has never been suggested that a Judge who has signed such a certificate is functus officio and canno......
  • S v Zwane
    • South Africa
    • Natal Provincial Division
    • 8 June 2004
    ...resulted in the withholding of the confirmation. (See R v Coetzee 1950 (1) SA 101 (C); R v Pirison 1959 (1) SA 102 (N); S v Maseko 1971 (4) SA 475 (T); S v Nkosi (1); S v Nkosi (2); S v Mchunu 1984 (4) SA 94 None of these eventualities can be associated with my decision G confirming the pro......
  • S v Nkosi (1); S v Nkosi (2); S v McHunu
    • South Africa
    • Transvaal Provincial Division
    • 10 May 1984
    ...het nie, herroep en vervang. (R v Beitswe 1960 (3) SA 714 (GW).) In hierdie Hof het HIEMSTRA R soos hy destyds was, in S v Maseko 1971 (4) SA 475 (T), ná verwysing na ondere die sake Makebe en Beitswe (supra), G ' n sertifikaat van 'n ander Regter herroep omdat laasgenoemde op rondgang was ......
  • Get Started for Free
9 cases
  • S v Zwane
    • South Africa
    • 8 June 2004
    ...v Coetzee 1950 (1) SA 101 (C): applied A R v Pirison 1959 (1) SA 102 (N): applied S v Madonda 1979 (3) SA 795 (Tk): applied S v Maseko 1971 (4) SA 475 (T): S v Mbayi 1976 (4) SA 638 (Tk): not B followed S v Mboyany en 'n Ander 1978 (2) SA 927 (T): considered S v Mokoena 1975 (4) SA 295 (O):......
  • S v Shange
    • South Africa
    • 26 May 1983
    ...because it ought not to have been granted in the first place. See eg R v Klue 1907 EDC 22; R v Pirison 1959 (1) SA 102 (N); S v Maseko 1971 (4) SA 475 (T); S v Moyo 1978 (4) SA 538 (R). It G has never been suggested that a Judge who has signed such a certificate is functus officio and canno......
  • S v Zwane
    • South Africa
    • Natal Provincial Division
    • 8 June 2004
    ...resulted in the withholding of the confirmation. (See R v Coetzee 1950 (1) SA 101 (C); R v Pirison 1959 (1) SA 102 (N); S v Maseko 1971 (4) SA 475 (T); S v Nkosi (1); S v Nkosi (2); S v Mchunu 1984 (4) SA 94 None of these eventualities can be associated with my decision G confirming the pro......
  • S v Nkosi (1); S v Nkosi (2); S v McHunu
    • South Africa
    • Transvaal Provincial Division
    • 10 May 1984
    ...het nie, herroep en vervang. (R v Beitswe 1960 (3) SA 714 (GW).) In hierdie Hof het HIEMSTRA R soos hy destyds was, in S v Maseko 1971 (4) SA 475 (T), ná verwysing na ondere die sake Makebe en Beitswe (supra), G ' n sertifikaat van 'n ander Regter herroep omdat laasgenoemde op rondgang was ......
  • Get Started for Free