S v Marais

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Citation2010 (2) SACR 606 (CC)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • S v Liesching and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...(CC) (2005 (4) BCLR 301; [2004] ZACC 20): J referred to 2017 (2) SACR p195 S v De Jager 1965 (2) SA 612 (A): referred to A S v Marais 2010 (2) SACR 606 (CC) (2011 (1) SA 502; 2010 (12) BCLR 1223; [2010] ZACC 16): referred to S v N 1988 (3) SA 450 (A): referred to S v Notshokovu [2016] ZASCA......
  • De Koker v Minister of Safety and Security
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...the court finds that the conduct of the police officers, who acted in the course and scope of their employment with the I 2010 (2) SACR p606 D Pillay A SAPS in pursuing, arresting, charging and detaining the plaintiff, was unlawful. [57] The plaintiff has consequently suffered damages to hi......
  • S v Seedat
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...S v Jaipal 2005 (1) SACR 215 (CC) (2005 (4) SA 581; 2005 (5) BCLR 423; [2005] ZACC 1): dictum in para [29] applied S v Marais 2010 (2) SACR 606 (CC) ([2010] ZACC 16): referred S v Maseola 2010 (2) SACR 311 (SCA) ([2010] ZASCA 37): referred to S v Mhlakaza and Another 1997 (1) SACR 515 (SCA)......
3 cases
  • S v Liesching and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...(CC) (2005 (4) BCLR 301; [2004] ZACC 20): J referred to 2017 (2) SACR p195 S v De Jager 1965 (2) SA 612 (A): referred to A S v Marais 2010 (2) SACR 606 (CC) (2011 (1) SA 502; 2010 (12) BCLR 1223; [2010] ZACC 16): referred to S v N 1988 (3) SA 450 (A): referred to S v Notshokovu [2016] ZASCA......
  • De Koker v Minister of Safety and Security
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...the court finds that the conduct of the police officers, who acted in the course and scope of their employment with the I 2010 (2) SACR p606 D Pillay A SAPS in pursuing, arresting, charging and detaining the plaintiff, was unlawful. [57] The plaintiff has consequently suffered damages to hi......
  • S v Seedat
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...S v Jaipal 2005 (1) SACR 215 (CC) (2005 (4) SA 581; 2005 (5) BCLR 423; [2005] ZACC 1): dictum in para [29] applied S v Marais 2010 (2) SACR 606 (CC) ([2010] ZACC 16): referred S v Maseola 2010 (2) SACR 311 (SCA) ([2010] ZASCA 37): referred to S v Mhlakaza and Another 1997 (1) SACR 515 (SCA)......