S v Bokbaard
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Court | Cape Provincial Division |
| Judge | Conradie R |
| Judgment Date | 23 March 1991 |
| Citation | 1991 (2) SACR 622 (C) |
| Hearing Date | 23 March 1991 |
Conradie R:
Die beskuldigde is tereg daaraan skuldig bevind dat hy met 22 daggaplante handel gedryf het. Hy het die daggaplante in 'n skottel en in 'n emmer gekweek. Hy het dan van die droë dagga pille gedraai en dit vir drank gaan verruil. Die beskuldigde het ruiterlik erken dat hy die daggaplantjies gekweek het met die doel om hulle produk as ruilware B te gebruik. Die skuldigbevinding is dus in orde.
Die beskuldigde is gevonnis tot 'n boete van R600 of 12 maande gevangenisstraf, plus 12 maande gevangenisstraf wat vir vyf jaar opgeskort is op voorwaarde dat die beskuldigde nie skuldig bevind word aan 'n oortreding van art 2(a) of (b) van Wet 41 van 1971 gepleeg C gedurende die tydperk van opskorting nie.
Ek het by die landdros navraag gedoen of daar redelikerwys van die beskuldigde verwag kon word om die boete te betaal, en of daar nie 'n wanverhouding tussen die boete en die alternatiewe gevangenisstraf was nie. Die landdros het op my navraag geantwoord deur te sê dat daar...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
S v Mqikela
...(Paragraph [8] at 401c - e.) Annotations: Cases cited Reported Cases S v Baliso 1991 (2) SACR 366 (T): followed I S v Bokbaard 1991 (2) SACR 622 (C): followed J 2005 (2) SACR p398 S v Fedani 2000 (1) SACR 345 (E): overruled S v Mahlangu 2004 (1) SACR 280 (T): criticised and not followed A S......
-
S v Gqobozo
...with the alternative of a fine was substituted by a suspended sentence. Annotations: Cases cited Reported cases S v Bokbaard 1991 (2) SACR 622 (C): explained and applied G S v Isaacs 2002 (1) SACR 176 (C): referred S v Jantjies and Another 1990 (2) SACR 440 (C): referred to S v Luthuli 2000......
-
S v Mazibuko
...sentence, which, if implemented, would be excessive and otherwise startlingly inappropriate, is to beg the question (S v Bokbaard 1991 (2) SACR 622 (C)). That is the position in this case. If the accused ever falls foul of the terms of suspension of sentence and it is brought into effect th......
-
S v Mqikela
...(Paragraph [8] at 401c - e.) Annotations: Cases cited Reported Cases S v Baliso 1991 (2) SACR 366 (T): followed I S v Bokbaard 1991 (2) SACR 622 (C): followed J 2005 (2) SACR p398 S v Fedani 2000 (1) SACR 345 (E): overruled S v Mahlangu 2004 (1) SACR 280 (T): criticised and not followed A S......
-
S v Gqobozo
...with the alternative of a fine was substituted by a suspended sentence. Annotations: Cases cited Reported cases S v Bokbaard 1991 (2) SACR 622 (C): explained and applied G S v Isaacs 2002 (1) SACR 176 (C): referred S v Jantjies and Another 1990 (2) SACR 440 (C): referred to S v Luthuli 2000......
-
S v Mazibuko
...sentence, which, if implemented, would be excessive and otherwise startlingly inappropriate, is to beg the question (S v Bokbaard 1991 (2) SACR 622 (C)). That is the position in this case. If the accused ever falls foul of the terms of suspension of sentence and it is brought into effect th......