Rex v Tshabala

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeInnes CJ, Solomon JA and Juta JA
Judgment Date29 November 1920
Citation1921 AD 13
Hearing Date23 November 1920
CourtAppellate Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 practice notes
  • Rex v Kuzwayo
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...to kill his wife; unfortunately children took the poison and died. TINDALL, J.A., after distinguishing that case from Rex v Tshabala (1921 AD 13), 'I have dealt with this case on the basis of the finding of the trial Court that the calabash into which the accused put the poison was that res......
  • Director of Public Prosecutions, Transvaal v Viljoen
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...67 (A) Mgcina v Regional Magistrate, Lenasia 1997 (2) SACR 711 (W) R v Hepworth 1928 AD 265 C R v Kuzwayo 1949 (3) SA 761 (A) R v Tshabala 1921 AD 13 Rammoko v Director of Public Prosecutions 2003 (1) SACR 200 (SCA) S v Agnew and Another 1996 (2) SACR 535 (C) S v Basson 2004 (1) SACR 285 (C......
  • S v Nkwenja en 'n Ander
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...as deel van die voorbehoue vraag vermeld. Hierdie vereiste is al meermale in beslissings van hierdie Hof benadruk. In R v Tshabala 1921 AD 13 op 15 het INNES HR "Where a question of law is reserved which depends upon facts not common cause, but in dispute on the evidence, then either the ju......
  • Rex v Longone
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...As to the first question reserved the principal - Chikokonya - was properly convicted of the murder of Makachi. See Rex v Tshabalala (1921 AD 13 at 18); van Hasselt's Misdaden (2.1.20); Halsbury's Laws of England (Hailsham ed., vol. 9, sec. 738); Gore's case (77 E.R. Accused was an accessor......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
  • Rex v Kuzwayo
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...to kill his wife; unfortunately children took the poison and died. TINDALL, J.A., after distinguishing that case from Rex v Tshabala (1921 AD 13), 'I have dealt with this case on the basis of the finding of the trial Court that the calabash into which the accused put the poison was that res......
  • Director of Public Prosecutions, Transvaal v Viljoen
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...67 (A) Mgcina v Regional Magistrate, Lenasia 1997 (2) SACR 711 (W) R v Hepworth 1928 AD 265 C R v Kuzwayo 1949 (3) SA 761 (A) R v Tshabala 1921 AD 13 Rammoko v Director of Public Prosecutions 2003 (1) SACR 200 (SCA) S v Agnew and Another 1996 (2) SACR 535 (C) S v Basson 2004 (1) SACR 285 (C......
  • S v Nkwenja en 'n Ander
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...as deel van die voorbehoue vraag vermeld. Hierdie vereiste is al meermale in beslissings van hierdie Hof benadruk. In R v Tshabala 1921 AD 13 op 15 het INNES HR "Where a question of law is reserved which depends upon facts not common cause, but in dispute on the evidence, then either the ju......
  • Rex v Longone
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...As to the first question reserved the principal - Chikokonya - was properly convicted of the murder of Makachi. See Rex v Tshabalala (1921 AD 13 at 18); van Hasselt's Misdaden (2.1.20); Halsbury's Laws of England (Hailsham ed., vol. 9, sec. 738); Gore's case (77 E.R. Accused was an accessor......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT