Rex v Parker & Allen
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Judge | Innes CJ, Solomon JA and CG Maasdorp JA |
| Judgment Date | 15 October 1917 |
| Citation | 1917 AD 552 |
| Hearing Date | 15 October 1917 |
| Court | Appellate Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
7 practice notes
-
S v Ndlovu
...S v Oosthuizen 1982 (3) SA 571; S v Singh 1975 (1) SA 227; S v F Dladla 1980 (1) SA 526; R v Freestone 1913 TPD 758; R v Parker and Allen 1917 AD 552; R v Stewart 1922 EDL 117; R v Mtetwa 1930 NPD 285; R v Claassen 1936 CPD 28; R v Levin and Another 1938 TPD 178; R v L 1946 AD 190; R v Kuma......
-
S v Ndlovu
...S v Oosthuizen 1982 (3) SA 571; S v Singh 1975 (1) SA 227; S v F Dladla 1980 (1) SA 526; R v Freestone 1913 TPD 758; R v Parker and Allen 1917 AD 552; R v Stewart 1922 EDL 117; R v Mtetwa 1930 NPD 285; R v Claassen 1936 CPD 28; R v Levin and Another 1938 TPD 178; R v L 1946 AD 190; R v Kuma......
-
Rex v Fourie and Another Appellants
...Sharpe (1903 T.S. 868 at p. 876 in which Reg. v Ring was approved); Rex v Smith (supra); Rex v Freestone (supra); Rex v Parker and Allen (1917 AD 552); Rex v de Vos (1919 NPD 398); Rex v Nlhovo (supra); Rex v Stewart (1922, E.D.L. 117); Rex v Seane (supra). In Rex v Claassen (supra) the que......
-
R v Davies and Another
...have upon occasion considered the matter, but so far as this Court is concerned there is only the obiter dictum in Rex v Parker and Allen, 1917 AD 552 at p. 555, which, according to the interpretation given to it in Rex v Seane A and Another, 1924 T.P.D. 668 at p. 679, supports the decision......
Get Started for Free
7 cases
-
S v Ndlovu
...S v Oosthuizen 1982 (3) SA 571; S v Singh 1975 (1) SA 227; S v F Dladla 1980 (1) SA 526; R v Freestone 1913 TPD 758; R v Parker and Allen 1917 AD 552; R v Stewart 1922 EDL 117; R v Mtetwa 1930 NPD 285; R v Claassen 1936 CPD 28; R v Levin and Another 1938 TPD 178; R v L 1946 AD 190; R v Kuma......
-
S v Ndlovu
...S v Oosthuizen 1982 (3) SA 571; S v Singh 1975 (1) SA 227; S v F Dladla 1980 (1) SA 526; R v Freestone 1913 TPD 758; R v Parker and Allen 1917 AD 552; R v Stewart 1922 EDL 117; R v Mtetwa 1930 NPD 285; R v Claassen 1936 CPD 28; R v Levin and Another 1938 TPD 178; R v L 1946 AD 190; R v Kuma......
-
Rex v Fourie and Another Appellants
...Sharpe (1903 T.S. 868 at p. 876 in which Reg. v Ring was approved); Rex v Smith (supra); Rex v Freestone (supra); Rex v Parker and Allen (1917 AD 552); Rex v de Vos (1919 NPD 398); Rex v Nlhovo (supra); Rex v Stewart (1922, E.D.L. 117); Rex v Seane (supra). In Rex v Claassen (supra) the que......
-
R v Davies and Another
...have upon occasion considered the matter, but so far as this Court is concerned there is only the obiter dictum in Rex v Parker and Allen, 1917 AD 552 at p. 555, which, according to the interpretation given to it in Rex v Seane A and Another, 1924 T.P.D. 668 at p. 679, supports the decision......
Get Started for Free