Ravene Plantations Ltd v Estate Abrey and Others
Jurisdiction | South Africa |
Judge | Solomon CJ, Wessels JA, Curlewis JA and Stratford JA |
Judgment Date | 18 October 1927 |
Citation | 1928 AD 143 |
Hearing Date | 30 September 1927 |
Court | Appellate Division |
Wessels, J.A.:
About the year 1910 a number of persons called the Ravene Estates Syndicate acquired a property near Inhambane in Portuguese East Africa. It was at that time managed by a Goanese called Pereira. He continued as the manager of the syndicate. About 1918 the syndicate became the Ravene Estates Ltd. The original syndicate held the bulk of the shares, but single shares were distributed to a few individuals so as to comply with the Natal laws regarding the registration of companies. Neither the members of the syndicate, nor of the company, interested themselves personally in the matter. Not one of them had been on the property since 1912. All their information came from Pereira who from time to time sent reports as regards his activities on the property. By 1914 the estate had cost the syndicate something in the neighbourhood of £14,000, but after that no money had been put into it either by the syndicate or the company. Pereira was left there to look after the property. He was paid no salary, but was entitled to make out of it what he could. The company derived no revenue from the estate. All that the directors of the company knew about the situation at Ravene was derived from such reports as Pereira chose to send them. It is therefore clear that the company held the Ravene estates not, for the purpose of deriving an annual income from it, but merely for the purpose of selling it if possible at a profit. There is no evidence that it was ever advertised for sale or that it was privately hawked about.
Wessels, J.A.
In 1924 an attorney named Leisegang who was then not in active practice and who was a friend of the son-in-law of the late H. Abrey, a director of the Ravene Estates, approached the latter as a prospective purchaser. He informed Abrey that he thought he might float a company to acquire the Ravene property, and asked for particulars. Abrey made it quite clear to Leisegang that neither he nor any of the directors had seen the property since 1912, and that all their information about it was derived from Pereira. He showed Leisegang reports from Pereira which purported to give an account of the cocoa-nut palms planted on the property. Before handing over these documents Abrey said to Leisegang: Leisegang, there has been nobody on the property since 1912 and there is no occasion for you to work in the dark. You go up and see for yourself." Abrey did not press Leisegang to buy, and told him that he could not bind his co-directors and could only speak for himself about granting an option. Leisegang then approached Harris of Messrs. Strickland & Harris to assist him in the promotion of a company it he exercised the option to buy the Ravene Estates, and suggested to them that they could become the secretaries of the new company. The price for the property suggested by Leisegang was £25,000, but Mr. Butcher, another director, refused to make it less than £30,000, and consequently an option to purchase was given for £30,000. Leisegang and Harris then proposed to inspect the Ravene Estate, but they wanted a letter of introduction so that there should be no difficulties when they arrived there. Liesegang saw Connal, the secretary of the Ravene Estates, and asked him for a letter of introduction. Connal wrote such a letter addressed to Pereira. This did not satisfy Leisegang: he refused to have Pereira's name on it. According to Mr. Connal, who was called for the plaintiffs, Leisegang did not want Pereira to know that he was going on the property. Connal then asked Leisegang to type a letter of introduction such as he wanted; and the following is the letter as typed by Leisegang:
"To whom it may concern:
This will serve to introduce Mr. C. G. Leisegang and friends who with our permission is making an inspection of the Ravene Estates, and we shall esteem it a favour if they are afforded any
Wessels, J.A.
and all information which they may require. They have also our permission to take any such samples as they may require, including samples of the soil on the estate.
For the Ravene Estates Ltd.
J. J. Beningfield.
Chairman of Directors."
Armed with this introduction Leisegang and Harris proceeded to the Ravene Estates. They met Pereira there, who took them to see whatever they desired. They remained a few days. They asked Pereira about the number of palms on the estate, and he informed them that according to his books he had planted 119,000 and that the failures could be put down at 10 per cent. According to Leisegang and Harris they made no real inspection, but relied entirely upon what Pereira told them. After their return...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Vicarious liability: not simply a matter of legal policy
...law on which the rules rest and the reasons or social justification for those rules. 4 See already Ravene Plantations Ltd v Estate Abrey 1928 AD 143 153: "It is a well-known principle of our law that a master is liable for the act of his servant so long as the servant does the act in the co......
-
Venter and Others v Credit Guarantee Insurance Corporation of Africa Ltd and Another
...1946 AD 946 at 951-2 Putter v Provincial Insurance Co Ltd and Another 1963 (3) SA 145 (W) Ravene Plantations Ltd v Estate Abrey and Others 1928 AD 143 Rex v Dhlumayo and Another 1948 (2) SA 677 (A) at 705-6 E Smith v Mann 1984 (1) SA 719 (W) Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd v Wilkinson 199......
-
Sampson v Union and Rhodesia Wholesale Ltd (In Liquidation)
...of the agent's powers and the burden of proof is on the person seeking to bind the principal. See Ravene Plantations v Estate Abray (1928 AD 143) and Kerr on Fraud and Mistake (5th ed., p. 97). The mistake was one of law and affords no relief. See Pollock on Contracts (9th ed., p. 507); Lea......
-
Goodman Brothers (Pty) Ltd v Rennies Group Ltd
...applied Randbank Bpk v Santam Versekeringsmaatskappy Bpk 1965 (4) SA 363 (A): compared Ravene Plantations Ltd v Estate Abrey and Others 1928 AD 143: dictum at 153 applied I Rosen v Wasserman and Another 1984 (1) SA 808 (W): compared Stocks & Stocks (Pty) Ltd v T J Daly & Sons (Pty) Ltd 1979......
-
Venter and Others v Credit Guarantee Insurance Corporation of Africa Ltd and Another
...1946 AD 946 at 951-2 Putter v Provincial Insurance Co Ltd and Another 1963 (3) SA 145 (W) Ravene Plantations Ltd v Estate Abrey and Others 1928 AD 143 Rex v Dhlumayo and Another 1948 (2) SA 677 (A) at 705-6 E Smith v Mann 1984 (1) SA 719 (W) Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd v Wilkinson 199......
-
Sampson v Union and Rhodesia Wholesale Ltd (In Liquidation)
...of the agent's powers and the burden of proof is on the person seeking to bind the principal. See Ravene Plantations v Estate Abray (1928 AD 143) and Kerr on Fraud and Mistake (5th ed., p. 97). The mistake was one of law and affords no relief. See Pollock on Contracts (9th ed., p. 507); Lea......
-
Goodman Brothers (Pty) Ltd v Rennies Group Ltd
...applied Randbank Bpk v Santam Versekeringsmaatskappy Bpk 1965 (4) SA 363 (A): compared Ravene Plantations Ltd v Estate Abrey and Others 1928 AD 143: dictum at 153 applied I Rosen v Wasserman and Another 1984 (1) SA 808 (W): compared Stocks & Stocks (Pty) Ltd v T J Daly & Sons (Pty) Ltd 1979......
-
King v Cohen Benjamin and CO
...the defendants by Pabst: see Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd v Macdonald, 1931 AD 412; Ravene Plantations D Ltd v Estate Abrey, 1928 AD 143 at pp. 153 - 4. Pabst had no actual authority to do what he did, nor can the defendants now rely upon ostensible authority, since Benjamin d......
-
Vicarious liability: not simply a matter of legal policy
...law on which the rules rest and the reasons or social justification for those rules. 4 See already Ravene Plantations Ltd v Estate Abrey 1928 AD 143 153: "It is a well-known principle of our law that a master is liable for the act of his servant so long as the servant does the act in the co......