R v Pirison
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Court | Natal Provincial Division |
| Judge | Holmes J and Jansen J |
| Judgment Date | 10 November 1958 |
| Citation | 1959 (1) SA 102 (N) |
| Hearing Date | 10 November 1958 |
Holmes, J.:
On 12th June, 1958, the accused was sentenced to 4 months' imprisonment with compulsory labour and 4 strokes in respect of a conviction for housebreaking with intent to steal and theft. The proceedings were confirmed on 21st June, 1958.
E On 23rd June, 1958, the accused was sentenced to 5 months' imprisonment with compulsory labour and 5 strokes in respect of a further conviction for housebreaking with intent to steal and theft. The proceedings were confirmed on 24th July, 1958.
The whippings have not yet been carried out, for reasons which it is not F necessary to set out. If they are now carried out, it will mean that
the accused will receive 9 strokes. Furthermore he received 7 strokes on 29th May, 1958, in respect of several counts of housebreaking; the magistrate did not know this when sentencing the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
12 practice notes
-
S v Zwane
...(At 295e - g.) J 2004 (2) SACR p292 Annotations: Cases cited Reported Cases R v Coetzee 1950 (1) SA 101 (C): applied A R v Pirison 1959 (1) SA 102 (N): S v Madonda 1979 (3) SA 795 (Tk): applied S v Maseko 1971 (4) SA 475 (T): applied S v Mbayi 1976 (4) SA 638 (Tk): not B followed S v Mboyan......
-
S v Shange
...information, and in some cases because it ought not to have been granted in the first place. See eg R v Klue 1907 EDC 22; R v Pirison 1959 (1) SA 102 (N); S v Maseko 1971 (4) SA 475 (T); S v Moyo 1978 (4) SA 538 (R). It G has never been suggested that a Judge who has signed such a certifica......
-
S v Mothae (2)
...before confirmation, would have resulted in the withholding of the confirmation (R v Madalena, 1936 E.D.L. 140).' Kyk ook R v Pirison, 1959 (1) SA 102 (N) en R v Beitswe, 1960 (3) SA 714 G Die wyse waarop. die feite onder die aandag van die Regter behoort gebring te word voordat hy die land......
-
S v Zwane
...before confirmation, would have resulted in the withholding of the confirmation. (See R v Coetzee 1950 (1) SA 101 (C); R v Pirison 1959 (1) SA 102 (N); S v Maseko 1971 (4) SA 475 (T); S v Nkosi (1); S v Nkosi (2); S v Mchunu 1984 (4) SA 94 None of these eventualities can be associated with ......
Get Started for Free
12 cases
-
S v Zwane
...(At 295e - g.) J 2004 (2) SACR p292 Annotations: Cases cited Reported Cases R v Coetzee 1950 (1) SA 101 (C): applied A R v Pirison 1959 (1) SA 102 (N): S v Madonda 1979 (3) SA 795 (Tk): applied S v Maseko 1971 (4) SA 475 (T): applied S v Mbayi 1976 (4) SA 638 (Tk): not B followed S v Mboyan......
-
S v Shange
...information, and in some cases because it ought not to have been granted in the first place. See eg R v Klue 1907 EDC 22; R v Pirison 1959 (1) SA 102 (N); S v Maseko 1971 (4) SA 475 (T); S v Moyo 1978 (4) SA 538 (R). It G has never been suggested that a Judge who has signed such a certifica......
-
S v Mothae (2)
...before confirmation, would have resulted in the withholding of the confirmation (R v Madalena, 1936 E.D.L. 140).' Kyk ook R v Pirison, 1959 (1) SA 102 (N) en R v Beitswe, 1960 (3) SA 714 G Die wyse waarop. die feite onder die aandag van die Regter behoort gebring te word voordat hy die land......
-
S v Zwane
...before confirmation, would have resulted in the withholding of the confirmation. (See R v Coetzee 1950 (1) SA 101 (C); R v Pirison 1959 (1) SA 102 (N); S v Maseko 1971 (4) SA 475 (T); S v Nkosi (1); S v Nkosi (2); S v Mchunu 1984 (4) SA 94 None of these eventualities can be associated with ......
Get Started for Free
