R v McMillan and Another
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Court | Eastern Cape Division |
| Judge | De Villiers JP |
| Judgment Date | 17 June 1958 |
| Citation | 1958 (3) SA 800 (E) |
| Hearing Date | 17 June 1958 |
B De Villiers, J.P.:
The two accused before me are charged with the murder of a native woman. They were in the first instance committed for trial together with a third person, but the charge against him has been withdrawn temporarily, and the preparatory examination was reopened and he was called as a witness for the Crown. There are in the record before C me three statements made by the three people who were originally charged together, and these statements are pro tanto confessions in various degrees, but each of these statements puts the major blame on somebody else. One may say that these statements can be divided into two parts. The present accused No. 1 and the person who was accused No. 2 at D the preparatory examination on the one side and accused No. 3 (now accused No. 2) on the other side. Accused Nos. 1 and 2 put the blame for the actual killing on No. 3 accused, and No. 3 accused puts the blame of the actual violence on accused No. 2 with the assistance of accused No. 1.
...Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
S v Bapela and Another
...learned Judge only taken the trouble to consult decisions such as R v Nzuza and Another 1952 (4) SA 376 (A), R v McMillan and Another 1958 (3) SA 800 (E) and R v B Mfuduka and Another 1960 (4) SA 770 (C), or if he had only afforded counsel for the State, who was obviously caught by surprise......
-
S v Witbooi and Others
...being subjected to prejudice merely because evidence is led against him which he does not welcome'. See also R v McMillan and Another 1958 (3) SA 800 (E) at 802B. On the other hand, where one (or more) accused pleads guilty while another J (or more) pleads not guilty, the approach has been ......
-
S v Levy
...accused persons at a joint trial is not necessarily a ground 1967 (1) SA p348 Hiemstra J for separation (R v McMillan and Others, 1958 (3) SA 800 (E), and R v Mfuduka and Another, 1960 (4) SA 770 (C)). It might even be in the interests of justice to refuse a separation in that the various d......
-
S v Bapela and Another
...learned Judge only taken the trouble to consult decisions such as R v Nzuza and Another 1952 (4) SA 376 (A), R v McMillan and Another 1958 (3) SA 800 (E) and R v B Mfuduka and Another 1960 (4) SA 770 (C), or if he had only afforded counsel for the State, who was obviously caught by surprise......
-
S v Bapela and Another
...learned Judge only taken the trouble to consult decisions such as R v Nzuza and Another 1952 (4) SA 376 (A), R v McMillan and Another 1958 (3) SA 800 (E) and R v B Mfuduka and Another 1960 (4) SA 770 (C), or if he had only afforded counsel for the State, who was obviously caught by surprise......
-
S v Witbooi and Others
...being subjected to prejudice merely because evidence is led against him which he does not welcome'. See also R v McMillan and Another 1958 (3) SA 800 (E) at 802B. On the other hand, where one (or more) accused pleads guilty while another J (or more) pleads not guilty, the approach has been ......
-
S v Levy
...accused persons at a joint trial is not necessarily a ground 1967 (1) SA p348 Hiemstra J for separation (R v McMillan and Others, 1958 (3) SA 800 (E), and R v Mfuduka and Another, 1960 (4) SA 770 (C)). It might even be in the interests of justice to refuse a separation in that the various d......
-
S v Bapela and Another
...learned Judge only taken the trouble to consult decisions such as R v Nzuza and Another 1952 (4) SA 376 (A), R v McMillan and Another 1958 (3) SA 800 (E) and R v B Mfuduka and Another 1960 (4) SA 770 (C), or if he had only afforded counsel for the State, who was obviously caught by surprise......