R v Maharaj

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeSchreiner ACJ, Steyn JA, Beyers JA, Van Blerk JA and Smit AJA
Judgment Date08 September 1958
Citation1958 (4) SA 246 (A)
Hearing Date03 September 1958
CourtAppellate Division

F Schreiner, A.C.J.:

On the 4th December, 1957, the applicant was convicted by JAMES, J., and assessors in the Durban and Coast Local Division of the murder of one Sayed Osman Habib and was sentenced to death. A fellow accused, one Essack, was found guilty of being an G accessory after the fact to the murder and was sentenced to two years' imprisonment, eighteen months of which was suspended. The deceased was strangled in a motor-car the other occupants of which were the applicant and Essack, and it was beyond question that the murder was actually carried out by one or other or both of them.

H JAMES, J., granted an application made by the applicant for a special entry, for leave to appeal and for the reservation of a question of law. The appeal in all its forms was heard by this Court on the 21st March, 1958, and was dismissed on the 27th of the same month. The Governor-General-in-Council did not exercise the prerogative of mercy in the applicant's favour and his execution was fixed for 11 a.m. on the

Schreiner ACJ

22nd May, 1958. On the same morning the applicant obtained from a Judge of the Transvaal Provincial Division an order staying the execution pending the determination of an application to be made to the Natal Provincial Division for a special entry.

A The basis of the application for a stay of execution and for the subsequent proceedings was an affidavit by one Govendar who gave evidence at the preparatory examination but not at the trial. At the preparatory examination he stated that a few days before the murder Essack had placed a belt round the witness's neck and pulled the witness B towards him but that this was done in play. In his subsequent affidavit Govendar said that the incident was different and that Essack told him that he was experimenting on how to strangle and...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
14 practice notes
  • Sefatsa and Others v Attorney-General, Transvaal, and Another
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Law Reports
    • 23 Noviembre 1988
    ...457 (W) at 463A; S v Matshoba and Another 1977 (2) SA 671 (A) at 677H; R v Milne and Erleigh (6) 1951 (1) SA 1 (A) at 7B; R v Maharaj 1958 (4) SA 246 (A); R v D 1953 (4) SA 384 (A); R v Nzimande 1957 (3) SA 772 (A); S v Alexander and Others (1) 1965 (2) SA 796 (A) at 805B - E, 809; S v Mush......
  • S v Khumalo
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Criminal Law Reports
    • 16 Mayo 2008
    ...Transvaal Provincial Division I 2002 (1) SACR 507 (T): approved R v D and Another 1953 (4) SA 384 (A): considered R v Maharaj 1958 (4) SA 246 (A): applied R v Mokwena 1953 (4) SA 133 (T): considered R v Sibande 1958 (3) SA 1 (A): applied S v Ebrahim 1972 (2) SA 61 (C): referred to J 2009 (1......
  • S v Khumalo
    • South Africa
    • Transvaal Provincial Division
    • 16 Mayo 2008
    ...499 at 502. That principle has since been confirmed on several occasions. See R v Sibande J Preller J A 1958 (3) SA 1 (A); R v Maharaj 1958 (4) SA 246 (A); S v Vontsteen 1972 (4) SA 1 (T). A full court of the Cape Provincial Division in S v Gentle and Another 2003 (1) SACR 395 (C) considere......
  • Mokoena v Minister of Justice and Another
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Law Reports
    • 1 Octubre 1968
    ...T.P.D. 17; R v D., 1953 (4) SA 384; Makings v Makings, 1958 (1) SA 338; Sibande v Minister of Justice, 1958 (2) SA 114; R v Maharaj, 1958 (4) SA 246; S v E., 1965 (4) SA 526; S v Kaplan, 1967 (1) SA 634; Sita v Olivier, 1967 (2) SA 442; Voet, 48.23.1; Gane, vol. 7, p. Zwarenstein, in reply,......
  • Get Started for Free
13 cases
  • Sefatsa and Others v Attorney-General, Transvaal, and Another
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Law Reports
    • 23 Noviembre 1988
    ...457 (W) at 463A; S v Matshoba and Another 1977 (2) SA 671 (A) at 677H; R v Milne and Erleigh (6) 1951 (1) SA 1 (A) at 7B; R v Maharaj 1958 (4) SA 246 (A); R v D 1953 (4) SA 384 (A); R v Nzimande 1957 (3) SA 772 (A); S v Alexander and Others (1) 1965 (2) SA 796 (A) at 805B - E, 809; S v Mush......
  • S v Khumalo
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Criminal Law Reports
    • 16 Mayo 2008
    ...Transvaal Provincial Division I 2002 (1) SACR 507 (T): approved R v D and Another 1953 (4) SA 384 (A): considered R v Maharaj 1958 (4) SA 246 (A): applied R v Mokwena 1953 (4) SA 133 (T): considered R v Sibande 1958 (3) SA 1 (A): applied S v Ebrahim 1972 (2) SA 61 (C): referred to J 2009 (1......
  • S v Khumalo
    • South Africa
    • Transvaal Provincial Division
    • 16 Mayo 2008
    ...499 at 502. That principle has since been confirmed on several occasions. See R v Sibande J Preller J A 1958 (3) SA 1 (A); R v Maharaj 1958 (4) SA 246 (A); S v Vontsteen 1972 (4) SA 1 (T). A full court of the Cape Provincial Division in S v Gentle and Another 2003 (1) SACR 395 (C) considere......
  • Mokoena v Minister of Justice and Another
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Law Reports
    • 1 Octubre 1968
    ...T.P.D. 17; R v D., 1953 (4) SA 384; Makings v Makings, 1958 (1) SA 338; Sibande v Minister of Justice, 1958 (2) SA 114; R v Maharaj, 1958 (4) SA 246; S v E., 1965 (4) SA 526; S v Kaplan, 1967 (1) SA 634; Sita v Olivier, 1967 (2) SA 442; Voet, 48.23.1; Gane, vol. 7, p. Zwarenstein, in reply,......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles