R v Khan

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Citation1954 (4) SA 517 (A)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 practice notes
  • R v Mahlobo and Another
    • South Africa
    • Natal Provincial Division
    • 14 Diciembre 1955
    ...with compulsory labour without the option of a fine. See Act 29 of 1954 sec. 17 (2), (3); Gardiner & Lansdown, Vol. 1, p. 549; R v Khan, 1954 (4) SA 517; R v Crancko & Another, 1955 (2) SA G. Lynn, for the Crown. Cur adv vult. Postea (December 14th). F Judgment Holmes, J.: The appellant, Ma......
  • R v Mahlobo and Another
    • South Africa
    ...with compulsory labour without the option of a fine. See Act 29 of 1954 sec. 17 (2), (3); Gardiner & Lansdown, Vol. 1, p. 549; R v Khan, 1954 (4) SA 517; R v Crancko & Another, 1955 (2) SA G. Lynn, for the Crown. Cur adv vult. Postea (December 14th). F Judgment Holmes, J.: The appellant, Ma......
  • S v Jacobs
    • South Africa
    ...prima facie at all events, be taken to mean "or" and not "and".' The final word, to my mind, was spoken by Hoexter JA in R v Khan 1954 (4) SA 517 (A) at 519H, when, in dealing with s 5 of Ord 1 of 1838, which provides that an accused may be sentenced to 'a fine . . . or to G imprisonment . ......
3 cases
  • R v Mahlobo and Another
    • South Africa
    • Natal Provincial Division
    • 14 Diciembre 1955
    ...with compulsory labour without the option of a fine. See Act 29 of 1954 sec. 17 (2), (3); Gardiner & Lansdown, Vol. 1, p. 549; R v Khan, 1954 (4) SA 517; R v Crancko & Another, 1955 (2) SA G. Lynn, for the Crown. Cur adv vult. Postea (December 14th). F Judgment Holmes, J.: The appellant, Ma......
  • R v Mahlobo and Another
    • South Africa
    ...with compulsory labour without the option of a fine. See Act 29 of 1954 sec. 17 (2), (3); Gardiner & Lansdown, Vol. 1, p. 549; R v Khan, 1954 (4) SA 517; R v Crancko & Another, 1955 (2) SA G. Lynn, for the Crown. Cur adv vult. Postea (December 14th). F Judgment Holmes, J.: The appellant, Ma......
  • S v Jacobs
    • South Africa
    ...prima facie at all events, be taken to mean "or" and not "and".' The final word, to my mind, was spoken by Hoexter JA in R v Khan 1954 (4) SA 517 (A) at 519H, when, in dealing with s 5 of Ord 1 of 1838, which provides that an accused may be sentenced to 'a fine . . . or to G imprisonment . ......