R v Balla and Others
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Judge | Schreiner JA, Fagan JA and Steyn JA |
| Judgment Date | 16 May 1955 |
| Citation | 1955 (3) SA 274 (A) |
| Hearing Date | 05 May 1955 |
| Court | Appellate Division |
A Schreiner, J.A.:
The three appellants were convicted of murder by a court consisting of CANEY, J. and assessors, sitting in the Natal Southern District Circuit Local Division. No extenuating circumstances being found, each was sentenced to death, but the learned Judge granted B them leave to appeal to this Court.
The facts as they appear from the Crown evidence may be briefly summarized as follows. [The learned Judge after analysing the evidence and having dismissed the appeal on the merits, proceeded.]
Counsel also argued that the trial Court should have found the existence C of extenuating circumstances, but in the absence of misdirection or other irregularity this argument could not be entertained, unless, it may be assumed, no reasonable Court could have come to any other conclusion than that, in the language of sec. 206 (2) of Act 31 of 1917, 'there are extenuating circumstances' (cf. Rex v Taylor, 1949 (4) SA 702 (AD) at pp. 716 et seq. and R v Mkize, 1953 (2) SA...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
S v Mncube en 'n Ander
...j ; Du Toit Strafreg in Suid-Afrika op 49 - 50. G J G Cilliers namens die Staat het na die volgende gesag verwys: R v Balla and Others 1955 (3) SA 274 (A) op 275; S v Babada 1964 (1) SA 26 (A) op 27H - 28A; S v Bowers 1971 (4) SA 646 (A) op 649A; S v Burger 1975 (4) SA 877 (A) op 800H; S v ......
-
S v Mbatha en Andere
...SA 320 (A) at 327A; R v Hercules 1954 (3) SA 826 (A) at 830H - 831A; R v Nsele 1955 (2) SA 145 (A) at 148A - F and 151A - F; R v Balla 1955 (3) SA 274 (A) at 275C - D; R v Selebano and Another 1957 (1) SA 384 (O) at D 388A - C; R v Mlambo 1957 (4) SA 727 (A) at 738B - E; R v Masinyana 1958 ......
-
S v Smith and Others
...case. It was accepted in S v Mdletshe 1978 (4) SA at 77F, but extenuating circumstances were there found to exist. In R v Balla 1955 (3) SA 274 it was suggested that the decision in R v Malopi 1954 C (1) SA 390 had affected the rule in R v Lembete 1947 (2) SA 603. Malopi's case, however, is......
-
S v Mgedezi and Others
...SA 566 (A); S v Bowens 1971 (4) SA 646 (A); S v Babada 1964 (1) SA 26 (A) at 27E - F; S v M 1976 (3) SA 644 (A); R v Balla and Others 1955 (3) SA 274 (A); S v Sebeko 1968 (1) SA 495 (A); S v Mmusi 1968 (1) SA 545 (A); S v Dladla 1980 (1) SA 1 (A) at 3G - 4; S v Zinn 1969 (2) SA 537 (A); S v......
-
S v Mncube en 'n Ander
...j ; Du Toit Strafreg in Suid-Afrika op 49 - 50. G J G Cilliers namens die Staat het na die volgende gesag verwys: R v Balla and Others 1955 (3) SA 274 (A) op 275; S v Babada 1964 (1) SA 26 (A) op 27H - 28A; S v Bowers 1971 (4) SA 646 (A) op 649A; S v Burger 1975 (4) SA 877 (A) op 800H; S v ......
-
S v Mbatha en Andere
...SA 320 (A) at 327A; R v Hercules 1954 (3) SA 826 (A) at 830H - 831A; R v Nsele 1955 (2) SA 145 (A) at 148A - F and 151A - F; R v Balla 1955 (3) SA 274 (A) at 275C - D; R v Selebano and Another 1957 (1) SA 384 (O) at D 388A - C; R v Mlambo 1957 (4) SA 727 (A) at 738B - E; R v Masinyana 1958 ......
-
S v Smith and Others
...case. It was accepted in S v Mdletshe 1978 (4) SA at 77F, but extenuating circumstances were there found to exist. In R v Balla 1955 (3) SA 274 it was suggested that the decision in R v Malopi 1954 C (1) SA 390 had affected the rule in R v Lembete 1947 (2) SA 603. Malopi's case, however, is......
-
S v Mgedezi and Others
...SA 566 (A); S v Bowens 1971 (4) SA 646 (A); S v Babada 1964 (1) SA 26 (A) at 27E - F; S v M 1976 (3) SA 644 (A); R v Balla and Others 1955 (3) SA 274 (A); S v Sebeko 1968 (1) SA 495 (A); S v Mmusi 1968 (1) SA 545 (A); S v Dladla 1980 (1) SA 1 (A) at 3G - 4; S v Zinn 1969 (2) SA 537 (A); S v......