Prinsloo v Du Preez, NO

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeVieyra J
Judgment Date30 June 1965
Citation1965 (4) SA 300 (W)
Hearing Date02 February 1965
CourtWitwatersrand Local Division

B Vieyra, J.:

Action was brought by Mrs. Ivy Prinsloo against the liquidator of The Yeoman Insurance Co. Ltd. for payment of compensation in terms of the Motor Vehicle Insurance Act, 29 of 1942, in respect of damages sustained by the plaintiff in a collision between an ambulance belonging to the City Council of Johannesburg and a motor vehicle insured by the aforesaid insurance company in terms of the said statute. C The plaintiff was a passenger in the ambulance, and she alleges she suffered damages in the sum of R20,000, due partly to the negligence of the driver of the insured vehicle and partly to the negligence of the driver of the ambulance.

Para. 8 of the declaration states as follows:

'The plaintiff has settled her claim against the City Council of Johannesburg in respect of the said collision and has released the said D City Council from further liability in respect thereof. The amount paid by the said City Council of Johannesburg to the plaintiff and accepted by her in full settlement of her claim against the said City Council is the sum of R1,750.'

The plaintiff says further that she is accordingly entitled to claim onehalf of the damages suffered, i.e. R10,000, from the defendant. In response to a request for further particulars the plaintiff supplied to E the defendant a copy of the agreement of settlement arrived at between her and the aforesaid City Council. This reads as follows:

'I, the undersigned, Ivy Dorothy Prinsloo (born Pieterse), do hereby accept from the City Council of Johannesburg the sum of R1,750 in full, final and absolute settlement of legal costs and all claims of any and every nature whatsoever which I have or may have against the City Council of Johannesburg and/or any of its employees and/or agents, F arising out of, consequent upon, or incidental to an accident which occurred on or about 9th June, 1962, when I sustained injuries.

I agree that payment of the aforesaid amount shall in no way constitute an admission of liability by the said City Council of Johannesburg and/or its employees and/or its agents.

I furthermore acknowledge and agree that the said settlement satisfies and discharges all legal costs, medical, surgical, hospital and other expenses of every nature whatsoever incurred or to be incurred by me as G a result of the bodily and other injuries sustained in the said accident; and also satisfies and discharges all damages of every nature whatsoever, directly or indirectly resulting from the said bodily injury, whether claimed by me in the said action or not, as well as all other claims for present, future and/or unascertained damages of any and...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
7 practice notes
  • Mosholi v Putco (Pty) Ltd
    • South Africa
    • 24 March 2011
    ...654 (SCA): referred to G Pangbourne Properties Ltd v Gill & Ramsden (Pty) Ltd 1996 (1) SA 1182 (A): referred to Prinsloo v Du Preez NO 1965 (4) SA 300 (W): referred to Road Accident Fund v Mothupi 2000 (4) SA 38 (SCA): referred to Smith v Road Accident Fund 2006 (4) SA 590 (SCA): dictum in ......
  • Becker v Kellerman
    • South Africa
    • Transvaal Provincial Division
    • 29 January 1971
    ...is) as 'n "joint wrongdoer" in terme van art. 2 (1) van die Wet. H Dit is ook aangevoer dat VIEYRA, R., in Prinsloo v. du Preez, N.O., 1965 (4) SA 300 (W), as uitgangspunt aanvaar het dat die middellik aanspreeklike eienaar, die Stadsraad van Johannesburg, 'n mededader in terme van art. 2 (......
  • Becker v Kellerman
    • South Africa
    • 29 January 1971
    ...Chaplin, 1927 AD at p. 327; Smit v. General Accident Fire & Life Insurance Co. Ltd., 1964 (3) SA at p. 740; Prinsloo v. du Preez, N.O., 1965 (4) SA 300. Contra van der Merwe & Olivier, Die Onregmatige Daad in SA D Reg, pp. 296 et seq. (Verdere betoog op versoek van die Hof). In terms of sec......
  • Masikane v Smit and Another
    • South Africa
    • 9 March 1965
    ...the second defendant may enter the witness-box and testify that the plaintiff failed to produce his reference book, that he 1965 (4) SA p300 Viljoen arrested him lawfully and that he never assaulted him. That evidence, or part of it, if believed, may put a completely different complexion on......
  • Get Started for Free
7 cases
  • Mosholi v Putco (Pty) Ltd
    • South Africa
    • 24 March 2011
    ...654 (SCA): referred to G Pangbourne Properties Ltd v Gill & Ramsden (Pty) Ltd 1996 (1) SA 1182 (A): referred to Prinsloo v Du Preez NO 1965 (4) SA 300 (W): referred to Road Accident Fund v Mothupi 2000 (4) SA 38 (SCA): referred to Smith v Road Accident Fund 2006 (4) SA 590 (SCA): dictum in ......
  • Becker v Kellerman
    • South Africa
    • Transvaal Provincial Division
    • 29 January 1971
    ...is) as 'n "joint wrongdoer" in terme van art. 2 (1) van die Wet. H Dit is ook aangevoer dat VIEYRA, R., in Prinsloo v. du Preez, N.O., 1965 (4) SA 300 (W), as uitgangspunt aanvaar het dat die middellik aanspreeklike eienaar, die Stadsraad van Johannesburg, 'n mededader in terme van art. 2 (......
  • Becker v Kellerman
    • South Africa
    • 29 January 1971
    ...Chaplin, 1927 AD at p. 327; Smit v. General Accident Fire & Life Insurance Co. Ltd., 1964 (3) SA at p. 740; Prinsloo v. du Preez, N.O., 1965 (4) SA 300. Contra van der Merwe & Olivier, Die Onregmatige Daad in SA D Reg, pp. 296 et seq. (Verdere betoog op versoek van die Hof). In terms of sec......
  • Masikane v Smit and Another
    • South Africa
    • 9 March 1965
    ...the second defendant may enter the witness-box and testify that the plaintiff failed to produce his reference book, that he 1965 (4) SA p300 Viljoen arrested him lawfully and that he never assaulted him. That evidence, or part of it, if believed, may put a completely different complexion on......
  • Get Started for Free