OK Bazaars (1929) Ltd v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeNienaber JA, Zulman JA, Cameron JA, Navsa JA and Nugent JA
Judgment Date12 March 2002
Citation2002 (3) SA 688 (SCA)
Docket Number278/2000
Hearing Date18 February 2002
CounselL R G Serrurier SC (with him K J Trisk) for the appellant. J M Suttner SC (with him R Hutton) for the respondent.
CourtSupreme Court of Appeal

Nugent JA:

[1] This appeal arises from a misstatement made by an employee of the appellant that is alleged to have caused economic loss to the respondent. The respondent's claim for recovery of damages in E respect of the loss succeeded in the Johannesburg High Court (before A Gautschi AJ) and the appellant appeals to this Court with the leave of the Court a quo.

[2] The respondent (Standard Bank) is a well-known commercial bank. At the time that is relevant to this appeal its F customers included the appellant (I will refer to it as Hyperama, which is the name of the relevant division of the appellant) and a company known as KTC Resources (Pty) Ltd (KTC). KTC was controlled by a certain Mr Khalid Malik. Malik also controlled a company known as Samarkand (Pty) Ltd (Samarkand). G

[3] KTC's account was held at the Sandton branch of Standard Bank. When KTC opened the account in October 1996 it ceded to Standard Bank its rights to 'all book debts and other debts, and claims of whatsoever nature, present and future, as a continuing covering security for all sums of money which (we) may now or at any time H hereafter owe or be indebted in to the Bank'. The deed of cession entitled Standard Bank to collect any debts that might become due to KTC, obliged KTC to hand to the bank all bills of exchange that it received in respect of such debts, and recorded that KTC would act as Standard Bank's agent in the collection of moneys that became due to KTC. I

[4] KTC was an importer of merchandise. The financing of its international transactions was dealt with at Standard Bank's international business division where Mr Vaughan McTaggart was employed as an international business consultant. J

Nugent JA

[5] Early in September 1997 Malik wrote to McTaggart requesting the bank to establish what he referred to as a 'back-to-back' letter A of credit for KTC to enable KTC to import a quantity of swimming pool chemicals from Spain. What he had in mind was a transaction that entailed Standard Bank establishing an irrevocable letter of credit in favour of KTC's overseas supplier against the security of an assurance by KTC's customer in this country that Standard Bank would be B reimbursed from the purchase price of the goods.

[6] Attached to Malik's letter was a completed application form for the establishment of the letter of credit, a pro forma invoice recording the purchase of the goods by KTC from a Swiss corporation known as Serenade Holdings Inc (Serenade), and an unsigned C document that was described by Malik as a copy of a 'guarantee format from the Hyperama'. The document, which was unsigned, purported to emanate from Hyperama, and recorded that Hyperama had placed an irrevocable order upon KTC for the supply of the goods in question. It also recorded that Hyperama undertook to pay Standard Bank a specified D sum (a portion of the purchase price) for the account of KTC 60 days after the goods had been delivered. (Provision was made for part payments to be made against part deliveries.)

[7] In anticipation of the undertaking being given by Hyperama McTaggart arranged for an irrevocable letter of credit to be prepared E in accordance with KTC's instructions. The effect of the letter of credit was that Standard Bank undertook irrevocably to pay Serenade the sum of US$ 210 800 (plus or minus 5% to allow for a variation of the price as a result of part shipments) against presentation to Standard Bank of specified documents. Those documents included commercial F invoices in triplicate for the amount of the particular drawing (quoting a specified indent number) and three sets of clean on board negotiable marine bills of lading to the order of the consignor and endorsed in blank. The moneys were to be paid by Standard Bank to the account of Serenade's bank (Banque Française de l'Orient) at G Bankers Trust New York 120 days from sight of the documents. The letter of credit recorded that the goods would be shipped in five equal deliveries between certain specified dates. H

[8] Mr John Overton was at that time the general manager of the home and wear section of Hyperama's business (the section of its business that dealt in merchandise other than foodstuff). He had overall responsibility for buying merchandise for that section of the business and about 30 buyers reported to him. I

[9] Soon after the letter of credit was prepared McTaggart received a telefax from Malik enclosing a copy of a letter that had been signed by Overton on behalf of Hyperama. That letter is the foundation for the respondent's claim and it is useful to set it out in full. The letter was addressed to the manager of Standard Bank and continued as follows: J

Nugent JA

'Dear Sir, A

Irrevocable undertaking to pay

We confirm that we have purchased from KTC Resources (Pty) Ltd (''the goods'') for the price of R1 881 268,20 excluding VAT as presented by our contract numbers JAB 003/3084; JAB 003/3085; JAB 003/3086; JAB 003/3087; JAB003/3088; JAB003/3089 (''the order''), and that KTC Resources (Pty) Ltd's rights but not its obligations in terms of the order have been ceded to you. B

We understand that you have agreed to finance the purchase of the goods from the supplier in Spain on the strength of our undertaking, which is given as follows:

1.

We hereby irrevocably undertake that 60 days after the end of the month of delivery of the goods to Hyperama stores, which goods are substantially in compliance with the order, we shall pay you an amount of R1 702 547,76 plus VAT. The cheque will be made payable in favour of KTC Resources (Pty) Ltd and will be available about one week before C due date at OK Shared Service Centre at Edenvale Hyperama, Brickfield Road, Germiston. KTC Resources (Pty) Ltd are to collect cheques from Edenvale.

2.

We acknowledge the fact that you are acting purely as financiers. We confirm that we will pay the amounts to you as per condition 1 of this letter and that any claims or disputes which might arise in respect of the goods will be instituted against KTC Resources D (Pty) Ltd.

3.

We further confirm that until payment has been received by you, ownership in the goods will remain vested in you, although risk in the goods shall pass to us upon delivery to our stores.'

(Sic.) E

[10] Who was responsible for the wording of the letter is not altogether clear. Overton said that it might have been based upon a draft submitted to him by Malik and that the wording was approved, if not drafted, by Hyperama's administration department. But whoever...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
25 practice notes
  • Van der Spuy v Minister of Correctional Services
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...v Raath and Another 1999 (3) SA 1065 (SCA): dictum at 1077E-F applied OK Bazaars (1929) Ltd v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd 2002 (3) SA 688 (SCA): referred to S v Mokgethi en Andere 1990 (1) SA 32 (A): dictum at 40I-41A applied G Sea Harvest Corporation (Pty) Ltd and Another v Duncan Do......
  • Fourway Haulage SA (Pty) Ltd v SA National Roads Agency Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SA 431 (SCA) ([2002] 3 All SA 741): dicta in paras [12] and [22] applied OK Bazaars (1929) Ltd v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd 2002 (3) SA 688 (SCA): dictum in para [23] Road Accident Fund v Shabangu and Another 2005 (1) SA 265 (SCA) ([2004] 2 All SA 356): dictum in para [18] applied H ......
  • De Klerk v Minister of Police
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...2018 (5) SA 380 (CC) (2018 (8) BCLR 893; [2018] ZACC 17): referred to OK Bazaars (1929) Ltd v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd 2002 (3) SA 688 (SCA) ([2002] ZASCA 5): referred Oppelt v Department of Health, Western Cape 2016 (1) SA 325 (CC) (2015 (12) BCLR 1471; [2015] ZACC 33): referred t......
  • Esorfranki (Pty) Ltd v Mopani District Municipality
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...referred to Odinfin (Pty) Ltd v Reynecke 2018 (1) SA 153 (SCA): referred to OK Bazaars (1929) Ltd v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd 2002 (3) SA 688 (SCA): referred Olitzki Property Holdings v State Tender Board and Another 2001 (3) SA 1247 (SCA) (2001 (8) BCLR 779; [2001] ZASCA 51): dictu......
  • Get Started for Free
23 cases
  • Van der Spuy v Minister of Correctional Services
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...v Raath and Another 1999 (3) SA 1065 (SCA): dictum at 1077E-F applied OK Bazaars (1929) Ltd v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd 2002 (3) SA 688 (SCA): referred to S v Mokgethi en Andere 1990 (1) SA 32 (A): dictum at 40I-41A applied G Sea Harvest Corporation (Pty) Ltd and Another v Duncan Do......
  • Fourway Haulage SA (Pty) Ltd v SA National Roads Agency Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SA 431 (SCA) ([2002] 3 All SA 741): dicta in paras [12] and [22] applied OK Bazaars (1929) Ltd v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd 2002 (3) SA 688 (SCA): dictum in para [23] Road Accident Fund v Shabangu and Another 2005 (1) SA 265 (SCA) ([2004] 2 All SA 356): dictum in para [18] applied H ......
  • De Klerk v Minister of Police
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...2018 (5) SA 380 (CC) (2018 (8) BCLR 893; [2018] ZACC 17): referred to OK Bazaars (1929) Ltd v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd 2002 (3) SA 688 (SCA) ([2002] ZASCA 5): referred Oppelt v Department of Health, Western Cape 2016 (1) SA 325 (CC) (2015 (12) BCLR 1471; [2015] ZACC 33): referred t......
  • Hlomza v Minister of Safety and Security and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Ngubane v South African Transport Services 1991 (1) SA 756 (A): referred to OK Bazaars (1929) Ltd v Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd 2002 (3) SA 688 (SCA): referred to G Premier of the Western Cape Province v Loots NO [2011] ZASCA 32: referred Premier, Western Cape v Faircape Property Deve......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • The Documentary Nature of Demand Guarantees and the Doctrine of Strict Compliance (Part 1)
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...discrepancies (which the applicant had done in this case). On appeal, in OK Bazaars (1929) Ltd vStandard Bank of South Africa Ltd 2002 (3) SA688 (SCA), the Supreme Court of Appeal conf‌irmed thejudgment of the Court a quo and held (at 697G-698A):‘A bank (‘‘theissuing bank’’) that establishe......
  • The Documentary Nature of Demand Guarantees and the Doctrine of Strict Compliance (Part 2)
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...neglects to present a document specif‌ied by theguarantee or presents a document that does not meet all the requirements of1382002 (3) SA 688 (SCA). For a full discussion of this case, see C Hugo ‘Documentary Credits andIndependent Guarantees’ ABLU 2004 (a paper delivered at the 2004 Annual......