Nash v Golden Dumps (Pty) Ltd

JurisdictionSouth Africa
JudgeCorbett JA, Miller JA, Hoexter JA, Van Heerden JA and Nicholas JA
Judgment Date27 March 1985
Citation1985 (3) SA 1 (A)
Hearing Date18 February 1985
CourtAppellate Division

Corbett JA:

In this appeal the appellant is Mr Adrian Nash. I shall refer to him as Nash. The respondent is a company known J as Golden Dumps (Pty) Ltd ("Golden Dumps").

Corbett JA

Nash instituted action against Golden Dumps in the A Witwatersrand Local Division claiming certain relief (the nature of which I shall detail later). After a protracted trial the Court ordered absolution from the instance and made a special order as to the costs of the case. With the leave of the Court a quo Nash now appeals against the whole of the judgment to this Court. The essential facts giving rise to the B dispute between the parties may be summarized as follows.

Golden Dumps was incorporated in 1977. At all times material the chairman of, and sole shareholder in, the company was a Mr Loucas Pouroulis. Pouroulis, a Greek Cypriot by birth, emigrated to and settled in South Africa in 1964. He held a diploma in what he described as "mining engineering and C metallurgical engineering" from the National Technical University of Athens. After his arrival in South Africa he obtained employment in the mining division of the Anglo American Corporation at the East Daggafontein Mines. While there he worked on the re-evaluation of the mine to see whether there were sufficient ore reserves to justify a continuation of D mining. In 1971 he left the Anglo American Corporation to start his own business. In the course of time he acquired a large number of claims in respect of mines which had been closed down and where the mining rights had lapsed, and also certain surface rights, which entitled him to search for and extract gold which had been left behind in slimes dumps, rock E dumps and elsewhere in and around the mining plant. In the exercise of these rights he carried out highly profitable "clean-up" operations at the East Daggafontein and South Roodepoort mines. He also conducted underground mining operations with some considerable success. In 1978 a company known as Modder 74 (Pty) Ltd ("Modder 74") was formed to establish a plant at the New Modderfontein Mines for the F recovery of gold there by a new method of recovery, called the carbon-in-pulp method. Pouroulis was the sole shareholder in Modder 74. The function of Golden Dumps was to hold on his behalf certain of the mining rights acquired by Pouroulis and to provide management services for the group.

In 1979 Pouroulis acquired a 20% interest in Government Gold G Mining Areas Ltd ("GGMA") and Golden Dumps took over the management of GGMA. The other major shareholder in GGMA was Mercabank Ltd ("Mercabank"). At the time the managing director of Mercabank was a Dr C Ferreira. In late 1979, and as a result of a suggestion emanating from Ferreira, negotiations commenced H for the take-over by GGMA of Pouroulis's shareholding in Modder 74 and his other mining interests. These negotiations continued into 1980 and eventually, on 26 June 1980, Mercabank published an announcement to the effect that agreement had been reached in principle that (I mention only the more important and relevant matters) the L C Pouroulis group mining interests in the East Rand would be acquired by GGMA against the issue to I Pouroulis of 4 300 000 ordinary shares in GGMA in consideration of a purchase price of approximately R6 000 000; that the name GGMA would be changed to Consolidated Modderfontein Mining Ltd ("Modderfontein"); and that application would be made to the Johannesburg Stock Exchange to have the shares in Modderfontein listed. The announcement further stated that this agreement was subject to the approval J of the Government,

Corbett JA

A of the shareholders in general meeting and of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange. This proposed transaction was generally referred to in the evidence as "the merger". Some six months were to elapse, however, before (on 6 January 1981) a formal agreement giving effect to the merger was executed. It B was during this period of six months that the events giving rise to the dispute between the parties occurred.

It had become apparent that the management team employed by Golden Dumps, whose strength lay in mining metallurgy, lacked someone with financial and administrative expertise. Pouroulis was accordingly on the look-out for someone with the right qualifications, who could be appointed to the position of C financial director of the group and could act as his "second-in-command". He discussed his problem several times with a business associate of his, a Mr David McKay, a director of Rand Merchant Bank. Towards the end of July/beginning of August 1980 McKay mentioned to Pouroulis that Nash was coming to South Africa from England and that he might be the man that Pouroulis was seeking.

D At that time Nash was living in London. He was the proprietor of a small company known as Global Oil Ltd and was engaged in what he described as "commodity trading and commission broking", particularly in the crude oil market. During 1980 he found it very difficult to make a reasonable living and he and E his wife thought it would be a good idea to emigrate. He decided to come to South Africa to try to find employment here and, if successful, to start a new life here. He spoke to McKay, an old friend, and McKay promised to do what he could to assist him.

Nash arrived in South Africa on 7 September 1980. McKay met him and he was invited to stay at McKay's home. The first person Nash was introduced to was Pouroulis. They met at the home of F Pouroulis on the evening of 7 September. Thereafter they met on a number of other occasions prior to Nash's return to London on 20/21 September. Pouroulis described to Nash the composition of his group and its activities and the nature of the proposed merger. He also told Nash that he was looking for a financial G director. Nash made a good impression on Pouroulis and on the other senior executives in the group.

One of the matters which was raised in discussions between Nash and Pouroulis was the possibility of raising money overseas in order to provide working capital for the new company to be created in terms of the merger. There is some dispute in the H evidence as to the background to and nature of these discussions concerning the raising of working capital. According to Nash, Pouroulis told him that for the merger to be successful he needed a substantial amount of investment capital. Nash indicated that he knew "certain people" overseas, including some Arab institutions, who might be interested in providing the investment capital. Pouroulis then asked him to I "look around" and try to find such an investor on his return to London. If Nash found found someone who was interested in principle, he was to inform Pouroulis, who would then join him in London and continue the negotiations. Nash was to have no authority to conclude any contract. Pouroulis told Nash that, if he (Nash) could successfully introduce the investor, he (Pouroulis) would make available to him (Nash) a large block of J shares in the new company at a substantial discount.

Corbett JA

During the course of their discussions Pouroulis also told Nash A that he planned to "internationalize" the group, ie undertake mining and associated projects overseas, and in this connection Pouroulis stated that he was investigating a project in Venezuela. Pouroulis also wished to have the shares of the company listed on the London Stock Exchange. He asked Nash, while in London, to make preliminary enquiries in regard to B these matters as well.

On 19 September 1980, according to Nash, he had lunch with Pouroulis. During the course of conversation the latter indicated that the position of financial director would be offered to Nash and, since Nash would require some time to C explore the possibilities of finding an investor, 15 October 1980 was agreed upon as a suitable date for him to commence employment with the company. Pouroulis said that he would put this in writing. After lunch a letter was drafted and handed to Nash by Pouroulis. It is written on a Golden Dumps letterhead and is signed "L C Pouroulis Chairman". It is dated D 19 September 1980. The body of the letter reads as follows:

"Dear Adrian

I am pleased to be able to offer you a position with our group in the capacity of financial director with effect from 15 October 1980.

Your commencing salary will be R60 000 per annum, and you will E have the free use of a Mercedes 230 Automatic motor car.

On conclusion of your negotiations abroad of all matters concerned with the re-organisation and amalgamation of Modderfontein Seventy-Four (Pty) Ltd and Government Gold Mining Areas (Modderfontein) Consolidated Ltd, you will be entitled to 200 000 shares in the new company broken down as follows:

75 000 at 1c each

75 000 at 50c each, and

F 50 000 at R1 each."

Nash stated in evidence that, after the letter was handed to him, he looked at it and "accepted it" (meaning, presumably, the offer contained in the letter). It was then that he learned for the first time the number of shares that were being offered to him and the prices. On the following day Nash left for G London. Pouroulis's version of the events leading up to the writing and handing over of this letter differs from Nash's mainly in regard to whether the shares were promised as a quid pro quo for introducing an investor. I shall refer to his contrary version later.

Shortly after arriving in London Nash made approaches to a Mr Henry Howard, a certain Mr Omar Namouk, an executive of the H First Arabian Trading Corporation, and a solicitor, Mr Anthony Lawson-Smith of the firm Spinks, Lawson-Smith, Berry and Co. He had various meetings and discussions with them. Namouk, in particular, showed interest. On 30 September Nash telephoned Pouroulis and told him what he had achieved. It was agreed that I Pouroulis would come to London on 6 October. On the following day Nash...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
44 practice notes
  • Sasfin (Pty) Ltd v Beukes
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Yeats Kontraktereg en Handelsreg 4th ed at 227; Joubert General Principles of the Law of Contract at 196; Nash v Golden Dumps (Pty) Ltd 1985 (3) SA 1 (A) at 22G; and Du Plooy v Sasol Bedryf (Edms) Bpk 1988 (1) SA 438 (A) at 455, F J A Heher SC (with him J A Woodward ) for the respondent ref......
  • Telcordia Technologies Inc v Telkom SA Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Mphahlele v First National Bank of SA Ltd 1999 (2) SA 667 (CC) Naidu v Blacher Bros 1946 CPD 922 at 926 Nash v Golden Dumps (Pty) Ltd 1985 (3) SA 1 (A) I National Director of Public Prosecutions and Another v Mohammed NO and Others 2002 (4) SA 843 (CC) in para [33] National Union of Metalwo......
  • Minister of Law and Order and Another v Parker
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977, Tsose v Minister of Justice 1951 (3) SA 10 (A); Duncan v Minister of Law and Order and Others 1985 (3) SA 1 (A); Tsenoli's/Kerchhoff's case supra at 1185I; and as to the factors to be taken into account by the arresting officer in deciding whether C......
  • Atteridgeville Town Council and Another v Livanos t/a Livanos Brothers Electrical
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SA 623 (T) at 624E-F, 625F-G; Rogers v Mathews 1926 TPD 21 at 22; Nochinowitz v Weinrich 1921 EDL 119; Nash v Golden Dumps (Pty) Ltd 1985 (3) SA 1 (A) at 22F-H; Crest Enterprises (Pty)Ltd vRycklof Beleggi,ngs (Edms)Bpk 1972 (2) SA 863 (A) at 870G; Walker's Fruit Farms Ltd v Sumner 1930 TPD ......
  • Get Started for Free
40 cases
  • Sasfin (Pty) Ltd v Beukes
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Yeats Kontraktereg en Handelsreg 4th ed at 227; Joubert General Principles of the Law of Contract at 196; Nash v Golden Dumps (Pty) Ltd 1985 (3) SA 1 (A) at 22G; and Du Plooy v Sasol Bedryf (Edms) Bpk 1988 (1) SA 438 (A) at 455, F J A Heher SC (with him J A Woodward ) for the respondent ref......
  • Telcordia Technologies Inc v Telkom SA Ltd
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Mphahlele v First National Bank of SA Ltd 1999 (2) SA 667 (CC) Naidu v Blacher Bros 1946 CPD 922 at 926 Nash v Golden Dumps (Pty) Ltd 1985 (3) SA 1 (A) I National Director of Public Prosecutions and Another v Mohammed NO and Others 2002 (4) SA 843 (CC) in para [33] National Union of Metalwo......
  • Minister of Law and Order and Another v Parker
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977, Tsose v Minister of Justice 1951 (3) SA 10 (A); Duncan v Minister of Law and Order and Others 1985 (3) SA 1 (A); Tsenoli's/Kerchhoff's case supra at 1185I; and as to the factors to be taken into account by the arresting officer in deciding whether C......
  • Atteridgeville Town Council and Another v Livanos t/a Livanos Brothers Electrical
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...SA 623 (T) at 624E-F, 625F-G; Rogers v Mathews 1926 TPD 21 at 22; Nochinowitz v Weinrich 1921 EDL 119; Nash v Golden Dumps (Pty) Ltd 1985 (3) SA 1 (A) at 22F-H; Crest Enterprises (Pty)Ltd vRycklof Beleggi,ngs (Edms)Bpk 1972 (2) SA 863 (A) at 870G; Walker's Fruit Farms Ltd v Sumner 1930 TPD ......
  • Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
  • Remedies, repentance and the doctrine of election in South African contract law
    • South Africa
    • Juta Acta Juridica No. , December 2019
    • 24 December 2019
    ...(3) SA 462 (A) 469; Mahabeer v Sharma NO & another 1985 (3) SA 729 (A) 736; Thomas v Henry 1985 (3) SA 889 (A) 896; Nash v Golden Dumps 1985 (3) SA 1 (A) 22; Chamber of Mines of South Africa v National Union of Mineworkers & another1987 (1) SA 668 (A)690D–G; Culverwell v Brown 1990 (1) SA......
  • Appraising the scope and application of the market-price rule in upheld contracts
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , April 2021
    • 6 April 2021
    ...Kerr’s Law of Sale and Lease 4 ed (LexisNexis 2014) 9n59 and 252.101See paragraph IV above.102Nash v Golden Dumps (Pty) Ltd 1985 (3) SA 1 (A) at 22.103Kaplan & Co v Basel Bros 1931 CPD 457 at 463; Chapman v Dwor 1921 CPD 433;Oellermann v Natal Indian Traders Ltd 1913 NPD 337; Dennill v Atki......
  • The law relating to executory contracts in South Africa during business–rescue proceedings
    • South Africa
    • Juta Journal of Corporate Commercial Law & Practice No. , August 2019
    • 16 August 2019
    ...relation to 69 LF van Huyssteen, GF Lubbe & MFB Reinecke Contract: General Principles5 ed (2016) 383.70 Nash v Golden Dumps (Pty) Ltd 1985 (3) SA 1 (A) at 22D–F.71 2017 (5) SA 420 (SCA) para 22.72 Solomon & Boltar op cit note 48 at 27. © Juta and Company (Pty) 50 (2017) 3 (2) JOURNAL OF C......
  • The President of RSA v Reinecke 2014 3 SA 205 (SCA) : recent case law
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet De Jure No. 48-1, January 2015
    • 1 January 2015
    ...employer who through unacceptable conduct repudiates acontract of employment. This, Corbett JA explained in Nash v GoldenDumps (Pty) Ltd 1985 3 SA 1 (A), occurs:Where one party to a contract, without lawful grounds, indicates to the otherparty in words or by conduct a deliberate and unequiv......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT