Land Matters and Rural Development: 2020

AuthorWillemien Du Plessis,Ebrezia Johnson,Juanita M. Pienaar
DOI10.25159/2522-6800/10469
Published date01 December 2021
Date01 December 2021
Pages1-21
Commentary
Southern African Public Law
https://doi.org/10.25159/2522-6800/10469
https://upjournals.co.za/index.php/SAPL
ISSN 2522-6800 (Online), 2219-6412 (Print)
Volume 36 | Number 2 | 2021 | #10469 | 21 pages
© Unisa Press 2022
Land Matters and Rural Development: 2020
Juanita M Pienaar
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7671-0821
University of Stellenbosch
jmp@sun.ac.za
Willemien du Plessis
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0907-5063
North-West University
willemien.duplessis@nwu.ac.za
Ebrezia Johnson
University of Stellenbosch
ebrezia@sun.ac.za
Abstract
Covid-19 had a profound impact on South Africa, not only in relation to its
health system but also in relation to matters such as access to land and adequate
housing. This note discusses, amongst other, the case law focusing on evictions
and housing reported during 2020. The note also indicates that restitution
remains a complex matter that is not going to be resolved soon. The proposed
2020 amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996 and
the proposed Expropriation Bill are further analysed. The proposed amendment
legislation in relation to upgrading of land rights to give effect to Constitutional
Court decisions is referred to. This note includes the most important 2020 land
reform developments pertaining to section 25 of the Constitution and
expropriation, land restitution, land reform legislation, unlawful occupation,
housing, deeds, sectional titles land redistribution and rural development.
Keywords: Land reform; redistribution; tenure reform; restitution; Khoi-San and
African customary law; land rights; unlawful occupation of land and
eviction; access to housing
Pienaar, Du Plessis and Johnson
2
General
The year 2020 will be remembered for the devastating effects of the Covid-19 virus and
the eventual lockdown. However, the virus also brought to the fore the inequalities still
existing in South African society. During this period, the courts had to deal with
evictions that were undertaken in the lockdown period and the right to housing. The
expropriation debate and the amendment of section 25 of the Constitution of the
Republic of South Africa, 1996 (Constitution) continued. The complexity of land claims
is illustrated where overlapping claims of communities led to the revoking of former
formal restitution of land. A traditional council and community were barred from
allocating claimed land to non-claimants, and in another case, it was made clear that a
court cannot amend an existing land claim to add new claimants.
An Upgrading of Land Tenure Rights Amendment Bill [B6B-2020] (Upgrading Bill)
was introduced in parliament to give effect to two court decisions that declared some of
the sections of the Upgrading of Land Tenure Rights Act 112 of 1991 (Upgrading Act)
unconstitutional. In the meantime, the courts still had to deal with issues raised in terms
of the 1991 Act.
The Traditional and Khoi-San Leadership Act 3 of 2019 was put into operation.
However, the Act is silent on how traditional leaders and their councils have to deal
with land matters.
The aim of this note is to highlight some of the land-related issues that emerged in 2020.
In this note, section 25 of the Constitution and expropriation, restitution, land reform
legislation, the Extension of Security of Tenure Act 62 of 1997 (ESTA), unlawful
occupation and eviction, housing, and land redistribution are discussed.
Section 25 of the Constitution and Expropriation
The review process that was embarked on in 2018 relating to section 25 of the
Constitution continued throughout 2020, specifically focusing on the expropriation of
land with nil compensation. In December 2019, the Draft Constitution Eighteenth
Amendment Bill
1
was published for comment. However, due to the onset of the Covid-
19-pandemic and the corresponding regulations issued under section 27(2) of the
Disaster Management Act 57 of 2002, various processes were suspended, including
public hearings. The term of the review committee furthermore expired, necessitating
the committee to be re-constituted on 1 July 2020. Public hearings resumed in the
second half of 2020, aiming to reach the deadline of 31 December 2020 to table a revised
section 25. As it happens, that deadline was again extended to 31 May 2021 and again
to 30 August 2021. At the time of writing, the process had not been concluded yet.
1
GG 42902 (13 December 2019) GN 652.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT