Jordaan v Evans, NO and Another
| Jurisdiction | South Africa |
| Court | Natal Provincial Division |
| Judge | Shaw J |
| Judgment Date | 15 November 1952 |
| Citation | 1953 (1) SA 75 (N) |
| Hearing Date | 15 November 1952 |
H Shaw, J.:
This is an application for leave to appeal to the Appellate Division against a judgment of the Full Court delivered on 27th August dismissing an application by the applicant for an order setting aside a direction made by the first respondent in terms of sec. 29 of Act 31 of 1937. When judgment was delivered application for leave to appeal was made, but as counsel who noted the judgment for the respondents was not instructed as to the attitude he should adopt, the application for leave to appeal was
Shaw J
adjourned sine die. It has now been set down for hearing on notice to the respondents who abide the decision of the Court. Mr. Boshoff states that the present application for leave to appeal is made because the applicant regards the case as falling under the provisions of sec. 105 A of the South Africa Act. He has referred me to the remarks of INNES, C.J., in Rex v...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
4 practice notes
-
R v Bhana
...v Building Workers' Industrial Union, 1939 AD 328; Maske v Aberdeen Licensing Court, 1930 AD 30; Jordaan v Evans, N.O. and Another, 1953 (1) SA 75. In the further alternative, this Court can entertain the application for leave to appeal under its extraordinary jurisdiction because there is ......
-
R v D and Another
...for further evidence but on 28th March, 1953, their attorneys, on the strength of the decision in Jordaan v Evans, N.O. and Another, 1953 (1) SA 75 (N), advised them that they did not require the leave of the Provincial Division. The appellants accordingly withdrew their application and fil......
-
R v D and Another
...for further evidence but on 28th March, 1953, their attorneys, on the strength of the decision in Jordaan v Evans, N.O. and Another, 1953 (1) SA 75 (N), advised them that they did not require the leave of the Provincial Division. The appellants accordingly withdrew their application and fil......
-
United Tobacco Companies (South) Ltd v International Tobacco Co of SA Ltd
...applicant's inspection all reports made by the respondent's employee Walaza on dates other than between the 1st November, 1949, and the 1953 (1) SA p75 Clayden 30th April, 1950, and by other non-European servants or agents of the respondent company employed on the Witwatersrand in the same ......
4 cases
-
R v Bhana
...v Building Workers' Industrial Union, 1939 AD 328; Maske v Aberdeen Licensing Court, 1930 AD 30; Jordaan v Evans, N.O. and Another, 1953 (1) SA 75. In the further alternative, this Court can entertain the application for leave to appeal under its extraordinary jurisdiction because there is ......
-
R v D and Another
...for further evidence but on 28th March, 1953, their attorneys, on the strength of the decision in Jordaan v Evans, N.O. and Another, 1953 (1) SA 75 (N), advised them that they did not require the leave of the Provincial Division. The appellants accordingly withdrew their application and fil......
-
R v D and Another
...for further evidence but on 28th March, 1953, their attorneys, on the strength of the decision in Jordaan v Evans, N.O. and Another, 1953 (1) SA 75 (N), advised them that they did not require the leave of the Provincial Division. The appellants accordingly withdrew their application and fil......
-
United Tobacco Companies (South) Ltd v International Tobacco Co of SA Ltd
...applicant's inspection all reports made by the respondent's employee Walaza on dates other than between the 1st November, 1949, and the 1953 (1) SA p75 Clayden 30th April, 1950, and by other non-European servants or agents of the respondent company employed on the Witwatersrand in the same ......
