Inclusive Pre-Sentencing Reports for Children Who Conflict With the Law: Applying and Executing Section 71 of the Child Justice Act

Citation(2024) 37 SACJ 1
DOIhttps://doi.org/10.47348/SACJ/v37/i1a1
Published date21 August 2024
Pages1-20
AuthorHuman, M.
Date21 August 2024
Inclusive pre-sentencing reports
for children who conict with
the law: Applying and executing
section 71 of the Child Justice Act
MARYNA HUMAN,* LEANDRÉ C GEOFFREY**
and1THEOPHILUS LAZARUS***
ABSTRACT
Despite the progressive nature of t he Child Justice Act (CJA) to uphold
the best interest pri nciple of all children who come into con ict with the
law, s 71(1) and (2) of the CJA that outlines the pre -sentencing evaluation
reports requi red for sentencing, fail to meet and uphold this object ive.
This is of par ticular import ance given the multi-complex and mult i-
faceted advancements in scienti c ndings regarding the development of
crimina l behaviour in children. T his paper reviewed and concluded the
following key aspects pert inent to the execution of pre-sentenci ng reports:
(1) practitioners are not provided wit h clear guidelines speci fying key
factors that need emphasis in t he pre-sentence report s; (2) practitioners
are often inexper ienced in child development (brain a nd psychological)
processes and lack the requisite k nowledge and skills in cr ime causation
to compile the reports; and (3) the best i nterest principle is hampered by a
severe stafng problem, heav y workloads, and tight timefr ames governing
the compilation and submission of rep orts.
This submission was pr imarily in uenced by the ndings from resea rch
that explored and subsequently developed an act ion plan for criminologis ts
with a view toward speciali sation in child justice. A liter ature review and
analysis of pre-ex isting ndings from t he aforesaid research, coupled with
reviews of academic l iterature fro m various academic s cientic sources
formed the basis of the arg uments presented in thi s submission.
* PhD; Schoo l of Criminal Ju stice, University of Sout h Africa.
** BA(Hons) MA Ph D (Unisa); Senior Lectu rer, Department of Cr iminology and
Crimina l Justice, University of L impopo.
*** PhD M NAN (USA); Adjunct Professor, Departm ent of Psychology, Emory University,
Registered Neurops ychologist (Health Profession s Council of South A frica).
https://doi.org/10.47348/SACJ/v37/i1a1
1
(2024) 37 SACJ 1
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd
1 Introduction
Worldwide, children1 are considered to be vulnerable members of
society. Reports of riots, murder, various forms of domestic violence,
interpersonal violence, gender-based violence, as well as forms of
sexual abuse (incest and rape), physical abuse (unpredictable and
harsh punishment), and emotional abuse are normal rather than the
exception in the daily lives of South Af rican children. Since a signicant
proportion of South African children are exposed to the stressors that
stem from these incidents, it is not surprising that crime and violence
have become ‘culturally acceptable’ to some of these young children
through constant exposure (observation and experience) this kind of
behaviour in their socialisation.2 The consequences of these stressors
are evident and documented in several crime and news reports.3 For
example, the 2019/20 crime statistics reected 779 murders committed
by South African chi ldren, reecting a victim- offender overlap
resulting from exposure to the aforesaid stressors.4 Rape, robbery
1 The Child Justice Ac t 75 of 2008 denes a ‘chi ld in conict wit h the law’ as any
person under 18 years of age, and i n certain circumst ances, persons under 21years
of age, who comes into contact w ith the crimi nal justice system d ue to being
suspected of, accused , or found guilty of i nfringing upon the law.’
2 Refer to RL Akers and GF Jens en ‘Empirical status o f Social Learni ng Theory of Crime
and Deviance: The pa st, present, and future’ in F T Cullen, JP Wright andKRBlevins
(eds )Taking Stock: T he Status of Criminological Theor y(2006) 37–76. and T Meena
‘Psychological theorie s of juvenile delinquenc y – a criminologic al perspective’
(2016) 2 Imperial J Interdiscipl Res 1644-1651.
3 See S Naik ‘Child ren responsible for 779 murder s in 2019/20’ IOL, 1 August 2020,
available at https://www.iol.co.za/sa turday-star/ne ws/children-r esponsible -for-779-
murders-in-201920-d658ee2b -d17d-430b-9465-81300b6d62a0, acc essed on 6 July
2023, which speaks to t he increase in violen t crimes, such as murde r committed
by children; See S M lamla ‘Large nu mber of juveniles in pr ison system a cause for
concern’ IOL, 17 June 2021, available at https://www.iol.co.za/capeargus/news/large-
number-of-juveniles-in-sa-prison-system-a-cause-for-concern-edfee2e9-f113-4d53-
890d- 4d93c36df417, accessed on 27 November 2023, which provides a di scussion
on the existing ju venile prisons det aining child ren who have conicted wit h the
law for various crim inal offences. Th is article also r efers to suitable rehabil itation
strategies for thi s vulnerable group. See to M Nganga ‘Concern over chi ldren being
entangled in the li fe of crime grows’ IOL, 24 S eptember 2022, avai lable at http s://
www.iol.co.za/weekend-argus/news/concern-over-children-being-entangled-in-
the-life-of-crime -grows-ade45650-c39b- 4f6a-9fb6 -fe0dba869d2f, accessed on
27November 2023, which highl ights several Schedule 3-related of fences committed
by children in So uth Africa.
4 Refer to P Hoosen, S Adams, H Ti liouine and S Savahl ‘Youth and adole scents’
perceptions on violence i n post-apartheid S outh Africa: A sy stematic review of
the literature, w hich speaks to the hi storical exposu re to violence in South Af rica
which has consistent neg ative impacts on all a reas of the child’s li fe’ (2022) 15
Child Indicators Res 8 85–911; see A Meulenberg ‘Cri me statistics on viole nce
against chi ldren in SA are nothi ng short of horric ’ Daily Maverick, 2 June 2022 ,
available at https://www.dailymav erick.co.za/article/2022- 06-02-cr ime-statistic s-
on-violence-against- children-in-sa-ar e-nothing-short-of-horr ic/, accessed on
2 SACJ . (2024) 1
https://doi.org/10.47348/SACJ/v37/i1a1
© Juta and Company (Pty) Ltd

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex