Herselman NO v Botha

JurisdictionSouth Africa
Citation1994 (1) SA 28 (A)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 practice notes
  • Van der Berg v Coopers & Lybrand Trust (Pty) Ltd and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...De Ramingh v Lake en 'n Ander 1979 O (3) SA 676 (T): referred to Gelb v Hawkins 1960 (3) SA 687 (A): referred to Herselman NO v Botha 1994 (1) SA 28 (A): considered Joubert and Others v Venter 1985 (1) SA 654 (A): applied Lennard's Carrying Company Ltd v Asiatic Petroleum Company Ltd [1915]......
  • Botha and Another v Mthiyane and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...to Gardener v Whitaker 1995 (2) SA 672 (E): referred to I Hall v Welz and Others 1996 (4) SA 1070 (C): referred to Herselman NO v Botha 1994 (1) SA 28 (A): dictum at 35G - J applied Holomisa v Argus Newspapers Ltd 1996 (2) SA 588 (W): referred to Holzgen v Woollwright 1928 TPD 5: dictum at ......
  • Gardener v Whitaker
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...element, such as absence of knowledge of wrongfulness, absence of animus iniuriandi, rixa (anger) and mistake J (Herselman NO v Botha 1994 (1) SA 28 (A) at 35C-F). In respect of those 1995 (2) SA p687 Froneman J A defences, such as truth and public benefit, privilege and fair comment, which......
  • A-Team Drankwinkel Bk en 'n Ander v Botha en 'n Ander NNO
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...insluiting van die dranklisensie'. Op hierdie grondslag sou J die wysiging van die bevel van die Hof a quo geen wesenlike sukses vir die 1994 (1) SA p28 Botha A appellant inhou nie, en gevolglik sou ek, behoudens die wysiging, die appèl van die hand wys, met koste, insluitend die koste van ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
16 cases
  • Van der Berg v Coopers & Lybrand Trust (Pty) Ltd and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...De Ramingh v Lake en 'n Ander 1979 O (3) SA 676 (T): referred to Gelb v Hawkins 1960 (3) SA 687 (A): referred to Herselman NO v Botha 1994 (1) SA 28 (A): considered Joubert and Others v Venter 1985 (1) SA 654 (A): applied Lennard's Carrying Company Ltd v Asiatic Petroleum Company Ltd [1915]......
  • Botha and Another v Mthiyane and Another
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...to Gardener v Whitaker 1995 (2) SA 672 (E): referred to I Hall v Welz and Others 1996 (4) SA 1070 (C): referred to Herselman NO v Botha 1994 (1) SA 28 (A): dictum at 35G - J applied Holomisa v Argus Newspapers Ltd 1996 (2) SA 588 (W): referred to Holzgen v Woollwright 1928 TPD 5: dictum at ......
  • Gardener v Whitaker
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...element, such as absence of knowledge of wrongfulness, absence of animus iniuriandi, rixa (anger) and mistake J (Herselman NO v Botha 1994 (1) SA 28 (A) at 35C-F). In respect of those 1995 (2) SA p687 Froneman J A defences, such as truth and public benefit, privilege and fair comment, which......
  • A-Team Drankwinkel Bk en 'n Ander v Botha en 'n Ander NNO
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...insluiting van die dranklisensie'. Op hierdie grondslag sou J die wysiging van die bevel van die Hof a quo geen wesenlike sukses vir die 1994 (1) SA p28 Botha A appellant inhou nie, en gevolglik sou ek, behoudens die wysiging, die appèl van die hand wys, met koste, insluitend die koste van ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT